<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leveraging Live Video Platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:04:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14907</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14907</guid>
		<description>Interesting points about muddying the line.  I think you would know the most about that, having &lt;a href=&quot;http://somethingtobedesired.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a multi-year scripted show&lt;/a&gt; under your belt. :)

Your question is absolutely on-point. &quot;What about your show is interesting?&quot;  People don&#039;t seem to think about this before going live... with ANYTHING.  &quot;Why would someone want to watch your show?&quot; &quot;Even if they like your show, why would someone want to watch you in a live broadcast?&quot;

Too many people don&#039;t think about what the appeal is to their loyal viewers, and certainly not what the appeal is to the casual viewer.  Lots to think about.  I&#039;ll keep this in mind if I set up a scripted show. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points about muddying the line.  I think you would know the most about that, having <a href="http://somethingtobedesired.com" rel="nofollow">a multi-year scripted show</a> under your belt. :)</p>
<p>Your question is absolutely on-point. &#8220;What about your show is interesting?&#8221;  People don&#8217;t seem to think about this before going live&#8230; with ANYTHING.  &#8220;Why would someone want to watch your show?&#8221; &#8220;Even if they like your show, why would someone want to watch you in a live broadcast?&#8221;</p>
<p>Too many people don&#8217;t think about what the appeal is to their loyal viewers, and certainly not what the appeal is to the casual viewer.  Lots to think about.  I&#8217;ll keep this in mind if I set up a scripted show. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kownacki</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14896</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kownacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14896</guid>
		<description>The possibilities of live interaction are interesting, but there&#039;s an odd side effect involved in potentially doing a live broadcast with the cast of a scripted show like 35 or STBD.  The vlogging world is built to champion individual videobloggers, not scripted shows, so we already stick out like sore thumbs in both traditional TV *and* the vlogging worlds -- not enough of one, too much of the other. To then muddy the line further, by having the live actors play the characters in a live, interactive version of the scripted show, would be... odd, possibly confusing, and really begs the question: what about the show is interesting if it&#039;s really actors videoblogging as fictional characters?  Where does the line between vlog and script lose its definition, and where&#039;s the appeal for the casual viewer who can&#039;t tell the difference because he thinks every web video is just a guy with a camera pointed at himself anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The possibilities of live interaction are interesting, but there&#8217;s an odd side effect involved in potentially doing a live broadcast with the cast of a scripted show like 35 or STBD.  The vlogging world is built to champion individual videobloggers, not scripted shows, so we already stick out like sore thumbs in both traditional TV *and* the vlogging worlds &#8212; not enough of one, too much of the other. To then muddy the line further, by having the live actors play the characters in a live, interactive version of the scripted show, would be&#8230; odd, possibly confusing, and really begs the question: what about the show is interesting if it&#8217;s really actors videoblogging as fictional characters?  Where does the line between vlog and script lose its definition, and where&#8217;s the appeal for the casual viewer who can&#8217;t tell the difference because he thinks every web video is just a guy with a camera pointed at himself anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14832</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14832</guid>
		<description>I agree with the life-enrichment potential of interactive, live video.  It&#039;s not so much that you&#039;re hosting a traditional &quot;show&quot;, but more that you&#039;re creating the time and place for all of us to come together and BE the show.

The chat room is as vibrant and fun as what&#039;s going on on-screen, which leads to everyone having a more fulfilling experience and getting to know each other better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the life-enrichment potential of interactive, live video.  It&#8217;s not so much that you&#8217;re hosting a traditional &#8220;show&#8221;, but more that you&#8217;re creating the time and place for all of us to come together and BE the show.</p>
<p>The chat room is as vibrant and fun as what&#8217;s going on on-screen, which leads to everyone having a more fulfilling experience and getting to know each other better. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny goldstein</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14829</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14829</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill,

Yeah, I agree with Kathryn: we&#039;re only scratching the surface of how rich interactive live video can be. I really feel like my &quot;audience&quot; and I are really connecting in a rich way. I don&#039;t know how useful this will be for big commercial media, but the connections I&#039;m making through the show are enriching my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill,</p>
<p>Yeah, I agree with Kathryn: we&#8217;re only scratching the surface of how rich interactive live video can be. I really feel like my &#8220;audience&#8221; and I are really connecting in a rich way. I don&#8217;t know how useful this will be for big commercial media, but the connections I&#8217;m making through the show are enriching my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathryn  Jones</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14808</link>
		<dc:creator>kathryn  Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/2008/03/06/leveraging-live-video-platforms/#comment-14808</guid>
		<description>I agree with both you and kfir 100 percent... it is the very interactivity that makes a web video inherent to the web... I think we have only begun to scratch the surface of what we can do with live... and I can&#039;t wait to see what unfolds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both you and kfir 100 percent&#8230; it is the very interactivity that makes a web video inherent to the web&#8230; I think we have only begun to scratch the surface of what we can do with live&#8230; and I can&#8217;t wait to see what unfolds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
