Comments on: Eye Candy http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/ Tue, 22 May 2012 15:18:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Why “Jersey Shore” SUCKED This Season | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-42227 Why “Jersey Shore” SUCKED This Season | Bill Cammack Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:19:51 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-42227 [...] girls basically served no purpose AT ALL other than Eye Candy in season 01. The only reason they were necessary was because the format of the original [...] [...] girls basically served no purpose AT ALL other than Eye Candy in season 01. The only reason they were necessary was because the format of the original [...]

]]> By: Content is King, *NOW* (Eye Candy is Over) | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-31250 Content is King, *NOW* (Eye Candy is Over) | Bill Cammack Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:44:09 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-31250 [...] is King” is a lie that’s been perpetuated in web video circles for a few years now. “Eye Candy” has always been.. Queen.. but I’ve recently noticed that the tables have turned and Content [...] [...] is King” is a lie that’s been perpetuated in web video circles for a few years now. “Eye Candy” has always been.. Queen.. but I’ve recently noticed that the tables have turned and Content [...]

]]> By: Are Women Funny? | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-21255 Are Women Funny? | Bill Cammack Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:45:40 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-21255 [...] IIRC determined that a whopping 8% of their viewership was female. Of course, that has to do with Eye Candy, but that’s a different topic. The point is… well… the point, I guess, is a [...] [...] IIRC determined that a whopping 8% of their viewership was female. Of course, that has to do with Eye Candy, but that’s a different topic. The point is… well… the point, I guess, is a [...]

]]> By: Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-19234 Bill Cammack Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:19:18 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-19234 Hey Beemycync. I don't see the relevance of your comment to this post in particular, but in general, you're correct. Helping out when you can is a useful way of being. Feel free to clarify your point and I'll comment on it. :) Hey Beemycync. I don’t see the relevance of your comment to this post in particular, but in general, you’re correct. Helping out when you can is a useful way of being.

Feel free to clarify your point and I’ll comment on it. :)

]]> By: Beemycync http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-19225 Beemycync Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:36:41 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-19225 Nothing seems to be easier than seeing someone whom you can help but not helping. I suggest we start giving it a try. Give love to the ones that need it. God will appreciate it. Nothing seems to be easier than seeing someone whom you can help but not helping.
I suggest we start giving it a try. Give love to the ones that need it.
God will appreciate it.

]]>