Comments on: Eye Candy http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:49:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Personal Brand? No Crossover | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-18905 Personal Brand? No Crossover | Bill Cammack Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:13:19 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-18905 [...] think that what this amounts to is “You can’t take it with you”. I had this discussion with Tyme White back in March, 2008. The question was, essentially, “If there’s a hostess (Eye Candy) [...] [...] think that what this amounts to is “You can’t take it with you”. I had this discussion with Tyme White back in March, 2008. The question was, essentially, “If there’s a hostess (Eye Candy) [...]

]]> By: Gym, Day 04 | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-18862 Gym, Day 04 | Bill Cammack Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:02:30 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-18862 [...] like going for a few more sets before leaving. Also, the lighting’s better, as I said, the Eye Candy’s better, just the overall feel of being there is more fun and familiar for me. When I finish [...] [...] like going for a few more sets before leaving. Also, the lighting’s better, as I said, the Eye Candy’s better, just the overall feel of being there is more fun and familiar for me. When I finish [...]

]]> By: Sarah Palin’s Wardrobe | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-18167 Sarah Palin’s Wardrobe | Bill Cammack Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:43:29 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-18167 [...] Now, McCain *could* have continued to let her dress like “whatever”. Click here for a gallery of Sarah Palin in her normal gear. This, however, would have been an egregious mishandling of Eye Candy. [...] [...] Now, McCain *could* have continued to let her dress like “whatever”. Click here for a gallery of Sarah Palin in her normal gear. This, however, would have been an egregious mishandling of Eye Candy. [...]

]]> By: Conversion of “Cred” | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-17165 Conversion of “Cred” | Bill Cammack Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:15:19 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-17165 [...] record of well-done videos… you have to have a fan base. You do NOT have to look good COUGHunlessyou’reafemaleCOUGH… you have to have a fan [...] [...] record of well-done videos… you have to have a fan base. You do NOT have to look good COUGHunlessyou’reafemaleCOUGH… you have to have a fan [...]

]]> By: Fame, Popularity & Star Power | Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-16320 Fame, Popularity & Star Power | Bill Cammack Fri, 16 May 2008 22:25:29 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-16320 [...] meant to bring this up in my post about Eye Candy… the typical use of an attractive chick as a front to get guys to click on your content [...] [...] meant to bring this up in my post about Eye Candy… the typical use of an attractive chick as a front to get guys to click on your content [...]

]]> By: Bill Cammack http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-14931 Bill Cammack Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:17:31 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-14931 Hmm... Interesting comment, Kathryn. I didn't get into the use or non-use of EC. It's so pervasive, I wanted to talk about the potential variations of that format instead of should one or should one not use sex appeal to gain viewers, and then why or why not. I also didn't get into whether accepting positions as EC makes women typecast and thus restricted in future opportunities or whether it offers them a wider range of opportunities thanks to so much media attention. Hmm… Interesting comment, Kathryn. I didn’t get into the use or non-use of EC. It’s so pervasive, I wanted to talk about the potential variations of that format instead of should one or should one not use sex appeal to gain viewers, and then why or why not.

I also didn’t get into whether accepting positions as EC makes women typecast and thus restricted in future opportunities or whether it offers them a wider range of opportunities thanks to so much media attention.

]]> By: kathryn Jones http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/comment-page-1/#comment-14927 kathryn Jones Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:53:07 +0000 http://billcammack.com/2008/03/10/eye-candy/#comment-14927 well bill, you know that I agree with you 100 percent... however... anytime a man or women is chosen for a job primarily on the merits of their sex appeal not only are they being objectified, but your long term business plan suffers for all the reasons you mention...nor are we as media makers doing anything positive for our society. well bill, you know that I agree with you 100 percent… however… anytime a man or women is chosen for a job primarily on the merits of their sex appeal not only are they being objectified, but your long term business plan suffers for all the reasons you mention…nor are we as media makers doing anything positive for our society.

]]>