Comments on: 6 Reasons New York City Is The Neverland Of Dating (For Da Fellaz)

By: married

married — Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:43:12 +0000

Great post. I think beautiful women move to both NYC and LA. I visited a friend in LA and went out with her and three of her gorgeous, perfectly-kept amazon friends (they were all over 5’8″ and all of them complained they did not have a boyfriend.) I, at 5’5″, was married. To a guy who makes good money. It was surreal.
These packs of gorgeous amazon women in LA and NYC should be good for tourism.

By: Bill Cammack

Bill Cammack — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:07 +0000

hahaha I’ll definitely check out your blog, Cougel! :D .. Cheers!

By: Cougel

Cougel — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:16:37 +0000

As a chick, I could be offended by this post, but I’m not! I dont know what the statistics are, but i think the perception- and the feeling- is accurate. Women are at a disadvantage in NY, especially as they get older.
Thanks for visiting my blog too!

By: Bill Cammack

Bill Cammack — Fri, 28 May 2010 21:54:26 +0000

Thanks for the comment, Joe.

I don’t know anything about the SoCal scene, but I would imagine that the female situation would be much better down there as it would be in Miami, for instance, where people are going to spend a lot of time at the beaches so they’re going to have more incentive to keep themselves in shape and looking good.

We have a lot of slackers in NYC. Since they don’t intend to take their clothes off, they let their bodies get into all kinds of states of disrepair. I think a more valid attack on the number theory is the overall percentage of HAWT chicks, not how old they might be. We have lots of girls here, but how many of them do you actually want? :D

Also, I think a guy’s location in the male pool is critically important. There are going to seem to be fewer available chicks to guys that rarely get raps. For guys higher up on the totem pole, you never end up socializing with all the girls you meet because every time you go somewhere, you meet more.

It’s like the restaurants here. You can never eat at all the NYC restaurants because a) there are so many of them, and b) by the time you ate at a bunch of them, some of those closed and re-opened under new management or new restaurants were built from scratch.

Either way, the problem isn’t the number of chicks here, but rather how you gain access to them. If you have a network of people that you socialize with, you’ll never run out of girls. If you have homeboys to come Hunting with you, you can always pick up new girls on the fly. If you’re a solo artist without many social skills, New York City can be a veeeeeeeeeeeeeery lonely place.

By: Bill Cammack

Bill Cammack — Fri, 28 May 2010 17:02:24 +0000

Thanks for the comment. :)

To be fair, the fact that there’s so much turnover here trumps the rest of the factors. I would agree with you if we were dealing with a stagnant population, but NYC life isn’t for everyone and women move out all the time and new women move in.

The ones that move here are coming for school or to try to make it in business or to try to live like they see in the movies like Sex & The City. The new chicks are in their low-to-mid 20s and remain viable until around 38, depending on genes, how they take care of themselves and whether life here runs them into the ground or not.

So, while I statistically understand and agree with what you’re saying, the fact remains that there are TONS of chicks in their 20s and 30s wandering around NYC aimlessly with nothing better to do than spend time with a guy they like.

I’m talking about actual reality, not what’s written on a website.