<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Professionals Avoid Web Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talkin&#8217; LOUD, and Sayin&#8217; NOTHIN&#8217;! (sayin&#8217; nothin&#8217;) &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/#comment-21484</link>
		<dc:creator>Talkin&#8217; LOUD, and Sayin&#8217; NOTHIN&#8217;! (sayin&#8217; nothin&#8217;) &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=1878#comment-21484</guid>
		<description>[...] not&#8230; Except all of your parameters are based on NOTHING that indicates skill AT. ALL. Since you don&#8217;t have any video professionals in the field, there&#8217;s nobody that can EP (Executive Produce) your videos. Therefore, the people doing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not&#8230; Except all of your parameters are based on NOTHING that indicates skill AT. ALL. Since you don&#8217;t have any video professionals in the field, there&#8217;s nobody that can EP (Executive Produce) your videos. Therefore, the people doing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time, Part 03: &#8220;Office Hours&#8221; &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/#comment-19875</link>
		<dc:creator>Time, Part 03: &#8220;Office Hours&#8221; &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=1878#comment-19875</guid>
		<description>[...] moving back into the MSM realm, as internet video has become the same thing for me, except without the revenue stream to sustain a viable budget. 4) I&#8217;m going to get into doing way more creative video projects. 5) I&#8217;m going to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] moving back into the MSM realm, as internet video has become the same thing for me, except without the revenue stream to sustain a viable budget. 4) I&#8217;m going to get into doing way more creative video projects. 5) I&#8217;m going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time, Business &#38; Handouts [Time: Part 1] &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>Time, Business &#38; Handouts [Time: Part 1] &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=1878#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>[...] is why professionals avoid web video. There&#8217;s normally no budget at all, and if there is, it&#8217;s whatever allowance was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is why professionals avoid web video. There&#8217;s normally no budget at all, and if there is, it&#8217;s whatever allowance was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter? Or Your Blog? &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/#comment-18765</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter? Or Your Blog? &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=1878#comment-18765</guid>
		<description>[...] as they were on April 03, 2007. You do NOT want &#8220;How To Break Up With Your Girl&#8221; or &#8220;Why professionals avoid web video&#8221; to blow away, because people always want to know these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as they were on April 03, 2007. You do NOT want &#8220;How To Break Up With Your Girl&#8221; or &#8220;Why professionals avoid web video&#8221; to blow away, because people always want to know these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/09/19/why-professionals-avoid-web-video/#comment-18697</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=1878#comment-18697</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Chris. :D

Our day MAY come, and it may NOT. :D

Over the last year, I&#039;ve been able to monitor the &quot;success&quot; of shows that were based on talent vs shows that were based on popularity.  The bottom line so far has been &quot;eyeballs&quot;, because without the ability to demonstrate the demographic that&#039;s clicking on videos, companies have to advertise in a &quot;shotgun&quot; method, which is basically selling a percentage of their actual hits as POSSIBILITIES that that percentage is going to be intersted in the advertiser&#039;s product and the advertiser&#039;s going to be interested in selling TO them.

Quality hasn&#039;t been justfied by budgets because the ROI isn&#039;t there.  Companies are doing well enough, hiring guys that completely SUCK at producing videos, but who have a large following = automatic audience.  The only other option is to hire someone GOOD at creating videos, but then hire someone GOOD at marketing and building and maintaining communities.

It&#039;s all going to change *IF* they figure out how to make money from online video. Until that time, they&#039;re going to keep scraping the bottom of the barrel and going with the cheapest way they can get a bunch of people to click over to their site.  You&#039;ll notice that they aren&#039;t even making a lot of &quot;Chick In Front Of The Camera&quot; talking-head shows anymore.  The old formulas are falling off and being replaced by actual production companies who are allotting part of their budget or their staffers&#039; prepaid time to generating content for the web.

The window&#039;s closing on both sides.  The &quot;haves&quot; and &quot;have nots&quot; are being decided.  The separation&#039;s becoming larger every day between the pros and the hobbyists.  2009&#039;s going to determine who keeps going in this industry and who takes their toys and goes home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Chris. :D</p>
<p>Our day MAY come, and it may NOT. :D</p>
<p>Over the last year, I&#8217;ve been able to monitor the &#8220;success&#8221; of shows that were based on talent vs shows that were based on popularity.  The bottom line so far has been &#8220;eyeballs&#8221;, because without the ability to demonstrate the demographic that&#8217;s clicking on videos, companies have to advertise in a &#8220;shotgun&#8221; method, which is basically selling a percentage of their actual hits as POSSIBILITIES that that percentage is going to be intersted in the advertiser&#8217;s product and the advertiser&#8217;s going to be interested in selling TO them.</p>
<p>Quality hasn&#8217;t been justfied by budgets because the ROI isn&#8217;t there.  Companies are doing well enough, hiring guys that completely SUCK at producing videos, but who have a large following = automatic audience.  The only other option is to hire someone GOOD at creating videos, but then hire someone GOOD at marketing and building and maintaining communities.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all going to change *IF* they figure out how to make money from online video. Until that time, they&#8217;re going to keep scraping the bottom of the barrel and going with the cheapest way they can get a bunch of people to click over to their site.  You&#8217;ll notice that they aren&#8217;t even making a lot of &#8220;Chick In Front Of The Camera&#8221; talking-head shows anymore.  The old formulas are falling off and being replaced by actual production companies who are allotting part of their budget or their staffers&#8217; prepaid time to generating content for the web.</p>
<p>The window&#8217;s closing on both sides.  The &#8220;haves&#8221; and &#8220;have nots&#8221; are being decided.  The separation&#8217;s becoming larger every day between the pros and the hobbyists.  2009&#8242;s going to determine who keeps going in this industry and who takes their toys and goes home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

