<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sluts &amp; Whores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:01:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill&#8217;s Contradictory Dating Advice &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/#comment-27214</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill&#8217;s Contradictory Dating Advice &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=2547#comment-27214</guid>
		<description>[...] to women being contradictory along the lines of trying to get relationships versus looking like &#8220;sluts&#8221; for hooking up with guys they actually want to have sex [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to women being contradictory along the lines of trying to get relationships versus looking like &#8220;sluts&#8221; for hooking up with guys they actually want to have sex [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Sex Expected On The Fourth Date? &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/#comment-26987</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Sex Expected On The Fourth Date? &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=2547#comment-26987</guid>
		<description>[...] of whether she likes the guy or not, the average gal on the scene is striving not to look like a ho. At some point in history, the Worldwide Queen Of All Women handed down the decree that the magic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of whether she likes the guy or not, the average gal on the scene is striving not to look like a ho. At some point in history, the Worldwide Queen Of All Women handed down the decree that the magic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexual Tension &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/#comment-26617</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexual Tension &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=2547#comment-26617</guid>
		<description>[...] different for women. There&#8217;s the societal pressure to not look &#8220;Easy&#8221; and get called all kinds of names. There&#8217;s the percentage chance that you might get pregnant even if you use birth control, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different for women. There&#8217;s the societal pressure to not look &#8220;Easy&#8221; and get called all kinds of names. There&#8217;s the percentage chance that you might get pregnant even if you use birth control, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Got Dumped After Sex &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/#comment-23752</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Got Dumped After Sex &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=2547#comment-23752</guid>
		<description>[...] basically, even though I feel the term &#8220;Slut&#8221; is grossly misused in American society, since it unfairly lumps together women who are CHOOSING to hook up with multiple guys via their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basically, even though I feel the term &#8220;Slut&#8221; is grossly misused in American society, since it unfairly lumps together women who are CHOOSING to hook up with multiple guys via their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2008/11/18/sluts-whores/#comment-23350</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=2547#comment-23350</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Joe.  I had missed Unknown&#039;s comment completely.

Essentially, I agree with what you&#039;re saying.  If you&#039;re going to date a known-promiscuous female, you either have to be blind to the facts or accept the facts that you see.

The concept of &quot;This is MY girl&quot; is out the window.  You&#039;re just her #1, or, I should say that you&#039;re the one that has the most access to her, time-wise.  You&#039;re the one she&#039;s more likely to spend time with if you and one of her other boyfriends invite her out for the same time period.

Most guys can&#039;t live with that an choose not to create relationships with women that they know are going to give it up to the next man at the drop of a hat.  You called it straight down the line.. &quot;stds , raising others guys kids and being chumped&quot; are the predictable future of your relationship with her.

Having said that, I&#039;ve seen guys go out like suckers for that type of thing, because, sadly enough, the promiscuous chick is the best sex they ever had.  Funny how that works out, right? :D  It&#039;s the same sex she&#039;s giving everybody else, but when YOU get it, it feels so good to you that you don&#039;t feel like messing with lame &quot;regular&quot; chicks haha.  No matter what you tell them, they insist on sticking with these chicks while they run around behind their backs.  It&#039;s kind of funny.. If you see their eyes, you can tell they&#039;re drinking the kool-aid.  They look brainwashed as they fight against the obvious truth that you&#039;re telling them because they knew it before they started dating the chick... They just laid down with her one time (or several) and couldn&#039;t get back UP! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Joe.  I had missed Unknown&#8217;s comment completely.</p>
<p>Essentially, I agree with what you&#8217;re saying.  If you&#8217;re going to date a known-promiscuous female, you either have to be blind to the facts or accept the facts that you see.</p>
<p>The concept of &#8220;This is MY girl&#8221; is out the window.  You&#8217;re just her #1, or, I should say that you&#8217;re the one that has the most access to her, time-wise.  You&#8217;re the one she&#8217;s more likely to spend time with if you and one of her other boyfriends invite her out for the same time period.</p>
<p>Most guys can&#8217;t live with that an choose not to create relationships with women that they know are going to give it up to the next man at the drop of a hat.  You called it straight down the line.. &#8220;stds , raising others guys kids and being chumped&#8221; are the predictable future of your relationship with her.</p>
<p>Having said that, I&#8217;ve seen guys go out like suckers for that type of thing, because, sadly enough, the promiscuous chick is the best sex they ever had.  Funny how that works out, right? :D  It&#8217;s the same sex she&#8217;s giving everybody else, but when YOU get it, it feels so good to you that you don&#8217;t feel like messing with lame &#8220;regular&#8221; chicks haha.  No matter what you tell them, they insist on sticking with these chicks while they run around behind their backs.  It&#8217;s kind of funny.. If you see their eyes, you can tell they&#8217;re drinking the kool-aid.  They look brainwashed as they fight against the obvious truth that you&#8217;re telling them because they knew it before they started dating the chick&#8230; They just laid down with her one time (or several) and couldn&#8217;t get back UP! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
