Archive for June, 2009
Hermann, Bill, Sarah, Charles and Grace

The lineup left to right. Hermann Mazard, Bill Cammack, Sarah Cooley, Host of the Blip,tv Party Charles Hope and me Grace Piper, originally uploaded by gpiper.
Hermann Mazard, Bill Cammack, Sarah Cooley, Charles Hope and Grace Piper
blip.tv Summer Party, 2009
The Chat Pack
Just found this picture that @courtenaybird posted:

Good Times! :D
I posted videos from that evening @ Who’s The Man? and Bill on NYC Partying: A Daily Operation.
#ChatPack
The Resident reports from Jeff’s 140Char conference
I haven’t had the time to upload any of my video from #140Char, so I’ll post someone else’s! :D
Cast:
Lori Harfenist: @TheResident
Jill Hanner: @JillHanner
Laura Fitton: @Pistachio
Jeff Pulver: @JeffPulver
Evan Slusher: @EvanSlusher
Facebook Username or Twitter Handle?
Facebook Username availability may affect the popularity of using one’s Twitter handle (like @BillCammack as identification.
I never used @BillCammack as identification because Twitter is a tool, not a home. The only reason for someone to go to my Twitter page is to click “Follow”. After that, they’ll be following me in whatever app they choose, so my Twitter handle is now worthless to me as a “home base”.
Personally, I tell people to Google Bill, because I’m me. That probably won’t work for you, so we’ll skip on past that one. :D
If you’re branding yourself properly, your screen names will be redundant across networks. This is because when something new shows up, Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce, ustream, livestream, blogtv, whatever.. People that know who you are and what you do are going to look for you as the same name you used in the previous social site. Therefore, your lineup should look like this:
Website: http://BillCammack.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/BillCammack
Facebook: http://facebook.com/BillCammack
Ustream: http://ustream.tv/BillCammack
etc, etc, etc…..
So, even if you couldn’t just Google me, you would be able to find out what I’m doing by using the username you already know me as on the next new popular site.
The question, then… is now that you have the opportunity to easily identify yourself as:
a) Your own website,
b) Your twitter handle, or
c) Your facebook page,
Which one will you gravitate towards to represent you in your social media interactions, and why?
Twitter: BillCammack
Facebook: BillCammack
Subscribe via RSS or Email
Social Media Category: billcammack.com/category/social-media
Get Your Facebook Username!
Facebook Usernames just became available 11 minutes ago, like http://www.facebook.com/BillCammack
Go get yours @ http://www.facebook.com/username/
Twitter: BillCammack
Subscribe via RSS or Email
Social Media Category: billcammack.com/category/social-media
“One to Many” Communication
Which style of communication do you like better? One to One, or One to Many?
A “non Social Media” friend of mine asked me “What’s new with you?” just now. I showed her a multi-person live video/audio/text chat application that I embedded on my blog, and then she goes “So, what’s new with you?”
I would have thought she was kidding, except I could see from her face and her body language that she felt like I had avoided her question instead of answering it. WHAT’S NEW is that we have this capability now to interact with each other whenever we want to. WHAT’S NEW is that I don’t have to travel to DELAWARE to see, talk to and share a laugh with my cousin. WHAT’S NEW is that I don’t have to waste my time traveling from location to location when I can press one button and talk live to someone RIGHT. NOW.
Once I got her to understand what I was showing her, her response was that she wouldn’t want to use that stuff. She likes telephones, texting, etc. She’s clearly a fan of One to One communication. I’m a fan of One to Many communication. Read the rest of this entry »




Web:





