<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Still Relevant? [Part 1 of 2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2009/07/07/are-you-still-relevant-part-1-of-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/07/are-you-still-relevant-part-1-of-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are You Still Relevant? [Part 2 of 2] &#124; Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/07/are-you-still-relevant-part-1-of-2/#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Are You Still Relevant? [Part 2 of 2] &#124; Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5533#comment-23497</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171;&#160;Are You Still Relevant? [Part 1 of 2]       Jul 08 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo;&nbsp;Are You Still Relevant? [Part 1 of 2]       Jul 08 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/07/are-you-still-relevant-part-1-of-2/#comment-23496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5533#comment-23496</guid>
		<description>hahaha You&#039;re just saying that because I properly backlinked to you under our picture!!! :D So that doesn&#039;t count! :D

Actually, what happened here is that this part was supposed to be background information leading to my actual point, which I&#039;m going to start typing right now as â€œAre You Still Relevant? [Part 2 of 2]â€.  Knowing how people read (or don&#039;t) my site, the information would have been lost on them if I had started it at the end of a section that became too long for my purposes, so I decided to call it in and make my real point separately.

The funny thing about this section of the post is that I&#039;m currently relevant to more people that I&#039;ve *NEVER* met than people that I *HAVE* met.  As you can see from my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quantcast.com/billcammack.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quantcast&lt;/a&gt; badge, I&#039;m getting ~7,000 uniques a month, and my readership is LITERALLY world-wide ( with you doing your part from Hawaii! *waves* :D )

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/billcammack/3245375299/&quot; title=&quot;Recent Visitor map for Lindsey Chen &amp; Bill Cammackâ€™s article: &quot;Top Ten Valentineâ€™s Day DONâ€™Ts!&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3305/3245375299_70f81fbc6c.jpg&quot; style=&quot;border: solid 2px #000000;&quot; alt=&quot;Recent Visitor map for Lindsey Chen &amp; Bill Cammackâ€™s article: &quot;Top Ten Valentineâ€™s Day DONâ€™Ts!&quot;&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

So I don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;personally&lt;/em&gt; have any relevance issues stemming from the situations I posted about.  That turned into an overly-long preamble to the point I&#039;m about to make right now. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha You&#8217;re just saying that because I properly backlinked to you under our picture!!! :D So that doesn&#8217;t count! :D</p>
<p>Actually, what happened here is that this part was supposed to be background information leading to my actual point, which I&#8217;m going to start typing right now as â€œAre You Still Relevant? [Part 2 of 2]â€.  Knowing how people read (or don&#8217;t) my site, the information would have been lost on them if I had started it at the end of a section that became too long for my purposes, so I decided to call it in and make my real point separately.</p>
<p>The funny thing about this section of the post is that I&#8217;m currently relevant to more people that I&#8217;ve *NEVER* met than people that I *HAVE* met.  As you can see from my <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/billcammack.com" rel="nofollow">Quantcast</a> badge, I&#8217;m getting ~7,000 uniques a month, and my readership is LITERALLY world-wide ( with you doing your part from Hawaii! *waves* :D )</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/billcammack/3245375299/" title="Recent Visitor map for Lindsey Chen &amp; Bill Cammackâ€™s article: &quot;Top Ten Valentineâ€™s Day DONâ€™Ts!&quot;" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3305/3245375299_70f81fbc6c.jpg" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" alt="Recent Visitor map for Lindsey Chen &amp; Bill Cammackâ€™s article: &quot;Top Ten Valentineâ€™s Day DONâ€™Ts!&quot;" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t <em>personally</em> have any relevance issues stemming from the situations I posted about.  That turned into an overly-long preamble to the point I&#8217;m about to make right now. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rox</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/07/are-you-still-relevant-part-1-of-2/#comment-23491</link>
		<dc:creator>Rox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5533#comment-23491</guid>
		<description>I can confirm you are somebody Bill. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm you are somebody Bill. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

