<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be Yourself in Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/#comment-46708</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5887#comment-46708</guid>
		<description>Word, Edie! :D haha It&#039;s so tough to backpedal when you&#039;re tired of playing the role you created for yourself.

I mean, it&#039;s EASY to backpedal, but you know you&#039;re going to lose all the gains you made in your relationship, so you just keep acting and acting and acting, until finally you can&#039;t do it anymore and then your SO wonders what happened to you that you changed so drastically.

In fact, you just got tired of BS&#039;ing and started being yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word, Edie! :D haha It&#8217;s so tough to backpedal when you&#8217;re tired of playing the role you created for yourself.</p>
<p>I mean, it&#8217;s EASY to backpedal, but you know you&#8217;re going to lose all the gains you made in your relationship, so you just keep acting and acting and acting, until finally you can&#8217;t do it anymore and then your SO wonders what happened to you that you changed so drastically.</p>
<p>In fact, you just got tired of BS&#8217;ing and started being yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edie</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/#comment-46563</link>
		<dc:creator>Edie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5887#comment-46563</guid>
		<description>Never send out a representative....If you make a list or rule book of dating, starting friendships, or whatever, please make this number one. This goes to the fundamental issue of trust in relationships. I am reminded of that scene in &quot;I&#039;m Gonna Git You Sucka&quot;, when he gets the hot chick home and there isn&#039;t anything on her that is real! HAHAHA! after that I didn&#039;t want to buy a wonderbra as to be labeled a FAKE. 
 Another one for the book is, Get your shit together. If you are happy with who you are, you won&#039;t feel compelled to send out a rep. The real deal will do. 
Once again, good sound advice about dudes, from a DUDE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never send out a representative&#8230;.If you make a list or rule book of dating, starting friendships, or whatever, please make this number one. This goes to the fundamental issue of trust in relationships. I am reminded of that scene in &#8220;I&#8217;m Gonna Git You Sucka&#8221;, when he gets the hot chick home and there isn&#8217;t anything on her that is real! HAHAHA! after that I didn&#8217;t want to buy a wonderbra as to be labeled a FAKE.<br />
 Another one for the book is, Get your shit together. If you are happy with who you are, you won&#8217;t feel compelled to send out a rep. The real deal will do.<br />
Once again, good sound advice about dudes, from a DUDE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/#comment-25439</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5887#comment-25439</guid>
		<description>lol @ &quot;doggie instincts&quot; haha :D

I might never cease to be amazed at people that think the game has changed one iota since the caveman days just because we wear clothes now and drive cars and interact with each other on the internet.

Women that don&#039;t think men are coming after them for sex are merely blinding themselves to the truth and making it tougher to understand their own relationships or at least the men they&#039;re in relationships with.

Similarly, women that think that setting up a sexual embargo against their guy (or at least having &quot;a headache&quot; or &quot;her period&quot; every other week) isn&#039;t going to push him to hook up with other chicks... Those women have another thing coming.  Don&#039;t complain to me about it.  Go read the cheating and divorce statistics. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol @ &#8220;doggie instincts&#8221; haha :D</p>
<p>I might never cease to be amazed at people that think the game has changed one iota since the caveman days just because we wear clothes now and drive cars and interact with each other on the internet.</p>
<p>Women that don&#8217;t think men are coming after them for sex are merely blinding themselves to the truth and making it tougher to understand their own relationships or at least the men they&#8217;re in relationships with.</p>
<p>Similarly, women that think that setting up a sexual embargo against their guy (or at least having &#8220;a headache&#8221; or &#8220;her period&#8221; every other week) isn&#8217;t going to push him to hook up with other chicks&#8230; Those women have another thing coming.  Don&#8217;t complain to me about it.  Go read the cheating and divorce statistics. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/#comment-25438</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5887#comment-25438</guid>
		<description>Oh and, &quot;SOME guys CAN and DO control their doggie instincts&quot; - Yeah, they&#039;re called women!  lol
I kid.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and, &#8220;SOME guys CAN and DO control their doggie instincts&#8221; &#8211; Yeah, they&#8217;re called women!  lol<br />
I kid.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/07/26/be-yourself-in-relationships/#comment-23965</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=5887#comment-23965</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmmm...
Raw chicken?
Alexis, let me attempt to do that thing that women do so well with men... Yeah, I&#039;m gonna&#039; read your mind.  ;)
I&#039;m thinking instead of saying romance, you meant to say passion. Right?  Because we all know that uncontrollable, warm, gushy feeling fizzles out all on it&#039;s own.  Poof.  Then you&#039;re left with a real, imperfect, person in front of you and not some idealized fantasy on two feet.  What?  Women objectify men that way?  Pshaw, you may say... I&#039;m thinking of the word &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.relationshipjourney.com/imagotherapy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Imago&lt;/a&gt; which I was pretty familiar with before Oprah could even spell it. 
Passion, on the other hand, is something you can consciously pump into a relationship when needed but it requires effort over the long haul.  File that under, nothing worth having is free. 

I agree with Frank: I&#039;d rather be known and recognized as a person than merely as a role in someone else&#039;s quest for a relationship fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmmm&#8230;<br />
Raw chicken?<br />
Alexis, let me attempt to do that thing that women do so well with men&#8230; Yeah, I&#8217;m gonna&#8217; read your mind.  ;)<br />
I&#8217;m thinking instead of saying romance, you meant to say passion. Right?  Because we all know that uncontrollable, warm, gushy feeling fizzles out all on it&#8217;s own.  Poof.  Then you&#8217;re left with a real, imperfect, person in front of you and not some idealized fantasy on two feet.  What?  Women objectify men that way?  Pshaw, you may say&#8230; I&#8217;m thinking of the word <a href="http://www.relationshipjourney.com/imagotherapy.html" rel="nofollow">Imago</a> which I was pretty familiar with before Oprah could even spell it.<br />
Passion, on the other hand, is something you can consciously pump into a relationship when needed but it requires effort over the long haul.  File that under, nothing worth having is free. </p>
<p>I agree with Frank: I&#8217;d rather be known and recognized as a person than merely as a role in someone else&#8217;s quest for a relationship fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

