<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: She&#8217;s Got A Boyfriend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/#comment-24564</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=6371#comment-24564</guid>
		<description>Yeah! :D  That&#039;s ANOTHER CLASSIC!!! :D

If you don&#039;t get to hear about her being &quot;spoken for&quot;, you have to hear about what HER GIRLFRIEND THINKS about her current mental &amp; emotional state.  It&#039;s like the chick put out a press release, and your friend is her PR agent.

Nobody cares.  Nobody cares.  Nobody cares.

If we cared about YOUR ASSESSMENT of someone else&#039;s situation, we would *ASK* *YOU* for your opinion.

You&#039;re also right that it&#039;s a trust issue.  A lot of chicks want to do their best to make sure their stupid-ass girlfriend doesn&#039;t ACCIDENTALLY GIVE IT UP to some guy. :D  Their easy-to-lay homegirl needs to be shielded from this guy, who&#039;s going to trick her out of sex... trick her INTO sex?... Anyway.. Nobody cares whether you trust ME, and if you don&#039;t trust your girl to do what she wants with her own body as a consenting adult, then you need to get better friends.

Are you getting PAID to babysit her?  Does she know she&#039;s like, your DAUGHTER and not your peer?  Does she know you think she&#039;s easy?  Does she know you think her word to her &quot;boyfriend&quot; means nothing at all?

Now that I&#039;m thinking about this topic, chicks probably do this to guys as well.  This is why you should NEVER update your &lt;a href=&quot;http://facebook.com/BillCammack/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; relationship status.  Leave it on SINGLE so that next time some chick you know has a girlfriend that wants to meet you, you don&#039;t get CBed by that chick blabbing about your personal business before you even get to tell the chick that likes you &quot;Hello&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah! :D  That&#8217;s ANOTHER CLASSIC!!! :D</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t get to hear about her being &#8220;spoken for&#8221;, you have to hear about what HER GIRLFRIEND THINKS about her current mental &amp; emotional state.  It&#8217;s like the chick put out a press release, and your friend is her PR agent.</p>
<p>Nobody cares.  Nobody cares.  Nobody cares.</p>
<p>If we cared about YOUR ASSESSMENT of someone else&#8217;s situation, we would *ASK* *YOU* for your opinion.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also right that it&#8217;s a trust issue.  A lot of chicks want to do their best to make sure their stupid-ass girlfriend doesn&#8217;t ACCIDENTALLY GIVE IT UP to some guy. :D  Their easy-to-lay homegirl needs to be shielded from this guy, who&#8217;s going to trick her out of sex&#8230; trick her INTO sex?&#8230; Anyway.. Nobody cares whether you trust ME, and if you don&#8217;t trust your girl to do what she wants with her own body as a consenting adult, then you need to get better friends.</p>
<p>Are you getting PAID to babysit her?  Does she know she&#8217;s like, your DAUGHTER and not your peer?  Does she know you think she&#8217;s easy?  Does she know you think her word to her &#8220;boyfriend&#8221; means nothing at all?</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;m thinking about this topic, chicks probably do this to guys as well.  This is why you should NEVER update your <a href="http://facebook.com/BillCammack/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> relationship status.  Leave it on SINGLE so that next time some chick you know has a girlfriend that wants to meet you, you don&#8217;t get CBed by that chick blabbing about your personal business before you even get to tell the chick that likes you &#8220;Hello&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/#comment-24552</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=6371#comment-24552</guid>
		<description>Who that one over there? Uhm, she just got out of a bad relationship!

WHO EFFING CARES!!!!!!!!

Does any one really care what came first, the chicken or the egg?? I dont! I just want some chicken strips in my omelette and she looks like a nice chicken for my meal!

and anyway, how does the person assume why im asking? what if I&#039;ve seen this chick before, or i know her friend, or like her shirt (or the lumps under it), or I think she can be an asset/contact in my field...

U either dont trust me or you dont trust her...
AND I dont care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who that one over there? Uhm, she just got out of a bad relationship!</p>
<p>WHO EFFING CARES!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Does any one really care what came first, the chicken or the egg?? I dont! I just want some chicken strips in my omelette and she looks like a nice chicken for my meal!</p>
<p>and anyway, how does the person assume why im asking? what if I&#8217;ve seen this chick before, or i know her friend, or like her shirt (or the lumps under it), or I think she can be an asset/contact in my field&#8230;</p>
<p>U either dont trust me or you dont trust her&#8230;<br />
AND I dont care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cammack</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/#comment-24543</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=6371#comment-24543</guid>
		<description>TELL me about it! :D

I wouldn&#039;t have an issue with this if it only happened TO ME, and it only happened with chicks that already knew me and what I&#039;m planning to do, haha.

The problem is that it&#039;s like an automatic switch.  Not knowing anything about the guy or his intentions, chicks just VOLUNTEER this information, as if the question they were asked had been &quot;Is that girl single?&quot;.  So you&#039;re right... They&#039;re skipping the &quot;Her name is ____&quot; or &quot;She&#039;s a videoblogger&quot; or &quot;She&#039;s a Rocket Scientist and speaks 5 languages&quot; to go right to his next question, &quot;Is she single?&quot; and eventually &quot;Can you hook a brotha UP? :D&quot;.

Unfortunately, that&#039;s demeaning to their own homegirls.  She&#039;s reducing the gal to whatever SHE thinks the guy wants.  She&#039;s also treating her girlfriend like a small baby by not letting her handle her own business.  Pay attention &amp; answer the question... or say &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; or &quot;I don&#039;t want to tell you&quot;.

EVEN adding information we never asked y&#039;all about AFTER THE FACT would be acceptable.  &quot;Her name is Jane.... AND she has a boyfriend&quot;.  At least that way, we got what we asked you for.

Maybe it&#039;s also an issue of the chicks not wanting to become accessories before the fact.  Maybe they feel like if they respond properly, they&#039;re going to be blamed by their girlfriend down the line for whatever happens.  As long as they blurt out &quot;SHE&#039;S GOT A BOYFRIEND&quot;, they can&#039;t be held responsible by their girl if the guy ends up kicking it to her.

Either way, it&#039;s really retarded, and it&#039;s amazing to me how many chicks come directly from the factory with this programming pre-installed. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TELL me about it! :D</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have an issue with this if it only happened TO ME, and it only happened with chicks that already knew me and what I&#8217;m planning to do, haha.</p>
<p>The problem is that it&#8217;s like an automatic switch.  Not knowing anything about the guy or his intentions, chicks just VOLUNTEER this information, as if the question they were asked had been &#8220;Is that girl single?&#8221;.  So you&#8217;re right&#8230; They&#8217;re skipping the &#8220;Her name is ____&#8221; or &#8220;She&#8217;s a videoblogger&#8221; or &#8220;She&#8217;s a Rocket Scientist and speaks 5 languages&#8221; to go right to his next question, &#8220;Is she single?&#8221; and eventually &#8220;Can you hook a brotha UP? :D&#8221;.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that&#8217;s demeaning to their own homegirls.  She&#8217;s reducing the gal to whatever SHE thinks the guy wants.  She&#8217;s also treating her girlfriend like a small baby by not letting her handle her own business.  Pay attention &#038; answer the question&#8230; or say &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; or &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to tell you&#8221;.</p>
<p>EVEN adding information we never asked y&#8217;all about AFTER THE FACT would be acceptable.  &#8220;Her name is Jane&#8230;. AND she has a boyfriend&#8221;.  At least that way, we got what we asked you for.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s also an issue of the chicks not wanting to become accessories before the fact.  Maybe they feel like if they respond properly, they&#8217;re going to be blamed by their girlfriend down the line for whatever happens.  As long as they blurt out &#8220;SHE&#8217;S GOT A BOYFRIEND&#8221;, they can&#8217;t be held responsible by their girl if the guy ends up kicking it to her.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s really retarded, and it&#8217;s amazing to me how many chicks come directly from the factory with this programming pre-installed. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Hope</title>
		<link>http://billcammack.com/2009/08/16/shes-got-a-boyfriend/#comment-24542</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billcammack.com/?p=6371#comment-24542</guid>
		<description>Since &quot;men only want thing&quot;, they&#039;re just skipping the redundant step in the interest of efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since &#8220;men only want thing&#8221;, they&#8217;re just skipping the redundant step in the interest of efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

