I’ve become bored of people trying to take credit for other people’s achievements and attempting to apply other people’s success to their personal resumes.

Here’s how things work in a Meritocracy… The better people get the better stuff. The worse people get the worse stuff.



So let’s say that everyone including you wants to be a secretary so how quickly you type is important.

For the sake of discussion, let’s assume that this is true:


What is an average typing speed?

Generally, a typing speed of 40 WPM (Words Per Minute) is considered an average typing speed. An average speed should not be confused with a “minimum speed” that some employers may use as a job requirement – an applicant must exceed the stated minimum speed. Some office jobs may have a higher minimum typing speed requirement than the standard “average” typing speed.

What is a good typing speed?

A typing speed above 40 WPM (Words Per Minute) is higher than the average score, and over 100 WPM is usually considered a high speed (when it is achieved with zero errors).

So let’s say you arrive for the secretary test and you score 50 words per minute, which is higher than the average typist.

In a Meritocracy, you WILL NOT GET THE JOB over someone who types 100 WPM because you are mentally deficient compared to them.

Now let’s say you start creating internet content talking about how some dude who has nothing to do with you, isn’t related to you, didn’t contribute to your genes in any way, and lived 200 years ago was able to type 110 WPM.


That doesn’t make YOU any better at typing.

You STILL don’t get the job.

After that, let’s say you try a different tactic and you point out a million people who type 20 WPM or can’t type at all because they only use one finger per hand.

Guess what? 😀


That doesn’t make YOU any better at typing.

You STILL don’t get the job.

All you can do by pointing out people that you think are dumber than you is tell people how many dumb people there are in the world.

It doesn’t make YOU any smarter. It’s no psychological achievement for you to be proud of.

There’s no value to “At least I don’t type 20 WPM!!! :D” when you type 50 and need to type 100.

You will not get hired because YOU are mentally inadequate, and it has nothing to do with however many millions of people might possibly be dumber than you are.

That’s how a MERITOCRACY works.

Nobody cares about anything other than whether YOU can do the job someone wants to pay you to do. If you can’t do it, or you do it more slowly, or you have a crabby attitude while you’re doing it, or you disqualify yourself in some other fashion, you don’t get the job and someone better than you does.


Assuming the dating world is a Meritocracy, your job is to be better than the next person if you want to win.

Similar to what I mentioned above, pointing out how horrible the other candidates are doesn’t get you laid.

All you can do is point out that you’re the best of the worst.

You’re still the worst.

You’re still inadequate.

You still don’t get what you want.

The solution to your problems IS NOT restricting women’s options so they have to scrape the bottom of the barrel and select you to procreate with.

It doesn’t work like that. They’d rather do nothing than mess with you. Even if you point out myriad worse dudes, that doesn’t make you look any better.

You’re still 10% when they’re looking for 90%.

What you need to do is IMPROVE YOURSELF instead of trying to make other people look worse in comparison.

You don’t want to be the amusement park ride that “only 100” people died on last year, compared to the rides that 200 people died on. You want to be the ride that ***NOBODY*** died on.

On top of that, if you have to attempt to convince chicks to only date people you consider to be similar to yourself, you’re admitting that when there’s ANY COMPETITION, you’re a loser.

In a Meritocracy, the winners are already winning.

By definition.

You make more money and she’s into tha? You win.
You live in a nicer place and she’s into that? You win.
You drive a fancier car and she’s into that? You win.
You actually listen to her and care about her life and she’s into that? You win.
She thinks you’re funnier and more interesting than other dudes? You win.
She trusts you when you say you’re only messing with her? You win.

In a Meritocracy, the winners aren’t trying to change the rules BECAUSE THEY’RE WINNING.

It’s always THE LOSERS that try to change the rules in the hopes that they can finally win something.

By definition, that makes you a loser if you’re trying to create special circumstances in society so you don’t have to compete in the Meritocracy.

Being a loser, you get what you deserve, which is mostly nothing.

And then here’s the kicker.

Let’s say you’re successful in convincing chicks that they shouldn’t date anyone worse than you. 😀

Guess what happens when their mentality shifts?

***YOU*** become the worst person for them to date.

I know this doesn’t make sense to the fools that run around attempting to do this, so let’s take the typing test as the example again.

If you type 50 WPM and you get your employers to believe they shouldn’t hire anybody at all that types more slowly than you do and they agree with you, you become THE. WORST. CANDIDATE. POSSIBLE. for that job. 😀

Does that make sense?

Thanks to your efforts, 50 is the new 0.

Whatever credit you might have received for not being the worst in an all-inclusive society just evaporated because you’re now the worst in a restricted society.

Thinking about dating again, why would a chick want to procreate with the worst dudes in a restricted society? 😀 haha You’ve decreased your own opportunities by shining a light on how much better than you the remaining competition is.


You’re already getting the picture by now. 😀

Pointing out that other people are dumber than you doesn’t make you smarter.

It only makes you the king of the dumb people.

I find it hilarious how people with zero academic achievement who can barely articulate their thoughts to create a video have the nerve to talk about someone else being uneducated.

What school did YOU go to?
Did you even graduate from college?
What impressive company hired YOU?
What did you invent?
What’s YOUR IQ, since you’re so concerned about comparing yourself to other people?

This is what I said earlier about losers.

Winners aren’t concerned with IQ because there’s no reason to rub it in your face how high mine is, alum.MIT.edu/www/BillCammack and pointing out how many points lower YOU scored doesn’t help me at all in a Meritocracy.

Your relative incompetence doesn’t make me a better person.

Of course I’m better than you and I have the achievements to prove it.

You can’t talk your way into prominence by claiming intelligence with no proven achievements.

You can say anything you want about me but my brain processes information faster than yours does.

If you want to impress somebody, be impressive.

Don’t attempt to prop yourself up by pointing out that you’re smarter than people who don’t need to be smart. 😀

What I mean by that is that intelligence is useful in a society which rewards intelligence.

If all you have to do in your life is walk around in the dust and pick fruit off of a tree, why would you need to know Calculus? 😀

***I*** don’t need to know Calculus, but I still had to pass the class in school to get my degree.

Place me in a society where all I have to do is walk around in the dust and pick fruit from a tree and my education is worthless.


What *I* need to know is how to kill that tiger before that tiger kills me.

While we’re on the subject of tigers, stop conflating indigenous people with the descendants of indigenous people.


Conflation happens when the identities of two or more individuals, concepts, or places, sharing some characteristics of one another, seem to be a single identity, and the differences appear to become lost.[1]

You’re doing yourself a disservice by assuming that Indians who grew up in India are the same as Indians that grew up in the USA.

I listened to some idiot on YouTube go on and on about the African Americans who live in Africa. 😀

No, STUPID, those are ***AFRICANS***.

They didn’t travel from Africa to the USA and then return there to repopulate their native lands. They’ve always been there.

If you expect an African who grew up in Africa to act like someone black (too long of an explanation to bother with in this article, as far as the differences between Negro, Colored, black and AA.) who grew up in the USA, you’re an idiot.

If you believe that “black” and “white” exist, you’re an idiot.

Go find black or white DNA. It doesn’t exist.

There’s African DNA and European DNA.

American “blacks” are usually at best 80% African. Sometimes as low as 60%.

Similarly, there’s no such thing as “white” DNA. You’re from Germany or France or Ireland or wherever you’re from, but there’s no country called “white”.

This is why in proper usage, neither black nor white is capitalized. Neither one exists. There was no spontaneous generation of human beings in Europe. They walked there from Africa.


merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture defines Culture as:

2: the act of developing the intellectual and moral faculties especially by education

4a: enlightenment and excellence of taste acquired by intellectual and aesthetic training

4b: acquaintance with and taste in fine arts, humanities, and broad aspects of science as distinguished from vocational and technical skills a person of culture

5a: the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon the capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations

5b: the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group; also the characteristic features of everyday existence (such as diversions or a way of life) shared by people in a place or time – popular culture – Southern culture

Everything mentioned there, if we exclude the relatively recent invention of the internet, is dependent upon PROXIMITY.

I live in and grew up in Manhattan, NYC, USA, the center of the Universe.

I do not have the first idea of how to deal with a jackal.

This is because I live in civilization and have never SEEN a jackal, unless maybe there was one at a zoo I visited as a child and I’ve forgotten that experience.

Regardless, I’ve never seen a jackal that could KILL ME IF IT WANTED TO! 😀 hahaha

My culture is based on being a Manhattan resident.

This is a completely different culture from being, say, a Brooklyn resident.

This is a completely different culture from being a Maryland resident.

This is a completely different culture from being an African.

I’m not saying any of these things matter as far as people getting along with each other or becoming friends.

I’m saying there’s a difference between growing up around jackals and not.

There’s a difference between growing up around desperate criminals and not.

There’s a difference between growing up around mostly blonde chicks and mostly brunette chicks.

There’s a difference between attending elite schools, attending vocational schools, and attending no schools at all.

Disregarding someone’s life experiences is a mistake.

Comparing traits of social groups that don’t even exist is a mistake.

Having no education and thinking you’re more intelligent than someone who’s highly educated is a mistake.

I’m not saying that there aren’t A LOT OF intelligent people who never went to school.

I’m saying you’re going to embarrass yourself if you attempt to assert dominance over someone who doesn’t even consider you intelligent enough to care about.

This is the main problem I have with writing articles like this. 😀

Everybody intelligent already knows this and isn’t thinking about this because they’re winning in the Meritocracy.

Everybody unintelligent is fighting against other dumb people for scraps at the bottom of the barrel.

The problem is that dumb people are talking to dumb people and they never get anywhere.

Smart people don’t have to talk to smart people because we’re all winning.

In a perfect world, dumb people would recognize how dumb they are and seek guidance from smart people, but Dunning–Kruger informs us that this will never happen:

In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein persons of low ability suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority derives from the metacognitive inability of low-ability persons to recognize their own ineptitude. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.[1]

As described by David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the cognitive bias of illusory superiority results from an internal illusion in people of low ability and from an external misperception in people of high ability; that is, “the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others.”[1] Hence, the corollary to the Dunning–Kruger effect indicates that persons of high ability tend to underestimate their relative competence, and erroneously presume that tasks that are easy for them to perform also are easy for other people to perform.[1]

So dumb people aren’t intelligent enough to understand that they need help.

They think they should be winning and they flounder around like fish out of water seeking explanations and excuses for why they’re losing.

When someone intelligent informs them they aren’t operating on an adequate level, dumb people write that off as arrogance, talking down to them, or attempting to oppress them.

In fact, it’s the opposite.

If you don’t know how dumb you are, you’ll never strive to improve yourself.

If you don’t improve yourself, our entire society suffers.

Allowing you to remain stupid without calling your attention to it is a disservice to our entire community.

Whether you can do something about it or not is a different issue.

If you think you’re smarter than I am but you’re hoping to shoot a rabbit for lunch while I can walk to the supermarket and buy steak, you’re a ******* idiot.


Let’s wrap this up. 😀

If you live in a Meritocracy and you’re complaining that you want things to change, that means you’re a loser relative to the people who are currently winning.

If you were winning, you wouldn’t be campaigning to try to WIN MORE.

If you were getting girls, you wouldn’t be campaigning to restrict who girls are hooking up with.

If you’re complaining about where you live, the winners are already living where they want, and they didn’t invite YOU for specific reasons which basically amount to they recognize you as a loser and they aren’t interested in diluting their community with the likes of you.

If you succeed in convincing women that everyone worse than you shouldn’t be dated, you’ve succeeded in making yourself the least desirable male in their minds, and they’re going to date winners even more, as opposed to giving you a chance.

If you have to convince chicks not to date other guys, you’re admitting inferiority to those guys because you need for them to be brushed aside so you can get any play at all.

If you want to claim credit for intelligence, you have to display your own achievements. Nobody cares that someone entirely unrelated to you was a genius. What have YOU done that people should respect and revere?

Excluding slower typists doesn’t make you type faster and doesn’t get you any secretarial jobs.

Where someone’s ancestors lived 500 years ago doesn’t help you when they’re smarter, better-looking, and more successful than you are today.

You can’t build self-esteem by pointing out people worse than you are. YOU still know who and what you are, and so does everyone else.

If you live in the UK and you’re hoping to immigrate to the USA, do not refer to us as “our” and “we”.

You are not “US”. You are “THEM”.

If you aren’t even an American yet in the year 2017, you REALLY need to STFU because “mulattos” existed here before the creation of the United States of America, as evidenced by anti-miscegenation laws documented as being written in 1664, so you’re exactly THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-THREE years late as far as having any say about who belongs where and you can go take a long walk on a short plank.


You don’t need to write laws against what isn’t already happening.

There’s a reason why American “blacks” are usually at most 80% African and it’s not the reason you think.

Go read the article.

You can not talk your way into prominence.

You can not talk your way into being an American citizen when you’re not.

You can not talk your way into people thinking you’re intelligent when you’re not.

You can not claim intelligence based on someone else’s achievements.

You can not claim bravery because your ancestors were the subject of the move “Braveheart”.

You weren’t even in the movie, much less on the battlefield. Make your own way in life. Stop trying to live off of other people’s accomplishments that have nothing to do with you.

You can’t claim intelligence by pointing out people who are dumber than you. You’re only the best of the worst. Congratulations.

You can’t claim that you’re sustaining your community into the next generation unless you’ve already produced the requisite 2.1 kids:


Sub-replacement fertility is a total fertility rate (TFR) that (if sustained) leads to each new generation being less populous than the older, previous one in a given area. In developed countries sub-replacement fertility is any rate below approximately 2.1 children born per woman, but the threshold can be as high as 3.4 in some developing countries because of higher mortality rates.[1] Taken globally, the total fertility rate at replacement was 2.33 children per woman in 2003.[1] This can be “translated” as 2 children per woman to replace the parents, plus a “third of a child” to make up for the higher probability of boys born and mortality prior to the end of their fertile life.[2]

So if you’re talking all that trash about blah blah my people and you haven’t contributed to the replacement population, you’re doing exactly ZERO for “your people”.

Unfortunately, that same trash you’re talking is what’s contributing to your lack of procreation.

You’re telling on yourself that you’re a loser by complaining about living in a Meritocracy and begging for the rules to be changed so you have a chance to win.

Survival of the Fittest dictates that chicks should have kids with winners.

What happens when you eject all the people you consider to be losers from your society and you make yourself the bottom of the barrel?.. What’s the incentive for a chick to have kids with you when *ANYBODY* she selects other than you would produce more viable and successful offspring? o_O

What happens when you eject all the grape-pickers from your society? 😀 .. Do the companies go out of business? Nope. Your welfare gets revoked and **YOU** are the new grape-picker. 😀 hahaha Good Luck pulling chicks or having kids.

In a Meritocracy, relativity counts for nothing. You can make something happen or you can’t. You’re viable as an employee or a husband or you aren’t.

Discussing people that you consider to be beneath you is worthless.

Even if they actually ARE beneath you! 😀

Your only win in a Meritocracy is to demonstrate why you’re BETTER than the best people, not why the worst people are worse than you.

If you don’t like where you live, move.

If you don’t like the girls you pull, step your game up.

If you don’t like the job you have, prove you deserve a better one compared to the person who’s currently doing that job.

Your only win in a Meritocracy is moving UP.

Pointing out how horrible people below you are merely identifies you as one of the lowest crabs in the barrel.

When was the last time you heard of a MLB player pointing out the flaws of a Little League player? o_O

Never. Because talking trash about kids isn’t going to elevate you from being a benchwarmer.

Focus on improving yourself instead of attempting to claim the title of the best of the worst.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Brilliant. Should be required reading for 10th graders.

    “I can’t, because I’m a victim” of (you name it, everybody is a victim of something) get a brain rush from parading their victimhood; and social media furthers the high with “likes”, or, the “feelz” and it feeds the loop. A lot of people depend on social media for “status”. Victims get instant status with no hard work involved.

    The winners are winners because they see victimhood as something to overcome. They work on themselves. They surround themselves with winners. They save their compassion for IRL situations; and get IRL respect. Most of the winners I know are extremely eager to help someone who genuinely wants help. Otherwise, they have no reason to be around. It’s a waste of their time and energy.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.