So I’m watching this MSNBC show, “Hardball”, and this dude, Chris Matthews is talking about Herman Cain and he uses this really great term.. “Rolling Disclosure”! :D hahahaha Oh Man, that perfectly describes what I’ve been wanting to write about.

Rolling Disclosure

Rolling Disclosure is when you only give up as much information as you think the person asking you the questions can actually prove.

Most of the time, this happens to me with women, and the discussion goes essentially exactly like this:

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I didn’t go out.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I stayed home and had a glass of wine.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I stayed home and drank a bottle of wine.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I went out with my girlfriends.. Girls’ Night Out! :D

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I met a guy while I was out with the girls.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I went home with the guy I met at the bar.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: He tried to kiss me, but I was like “No”. :D

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: We made out, but he didn’t **** me.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I arrived home at 7am, when I had left the bar at 3am.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I never came so much in my entire life!!! >:D

So you can see how annoying this is.. Waiting for chicks to tell you the actual truth about their evening, instead of trying to bullshit you and avoid getting caught up in the “She’s Easy” sexual double standard.

Meanwhile, your credibility is SHOT. Kaput. Finished.

From now on, when you say “I stayed at home and drank a glass of wine”, I assume you got reamed out by some dude, and that’s a good thing! :D I’m happy for you! More power to ya! haha Get In Where You Fit In!!! >:D

Sammi

This happened to Sammi from “Jersey Shore”.

I’m not going to go over the whole situation, because I already wrote about it in “Girls Don’t Have Friends That Are Guys”, but the main point is that she texted this dude to come meet her at a club, and Nicole confronted her and asked her who she texted.

Sammi insisted that she didn’t text any dudes until Nicole informed her that a) the dude was there in the club, and b) she had already seen the texts from Sammi on his Blackberry.

Sammi immediately changed her story from “I didn’t text any guys” to “I texted him, but he’s just a friend.”

She held the line with her rolling disclosure until she finally had to admit that she had messed with him before, because he was prepared to give the play-by-play of what he did with her, where, and when, to her current boyfriend, Ronnie.

The thing about Rolling Disclosure is that you have to wonder why people are asking you certain questions. You have to wonder why someone would ask you WHO you texted instead of asking you IF you texted anyone. o_O

Once this happens to you, it’s in your best interests to assume they know everything, and give up the ghost ASAP.

You’re totally better off fessin’ up, because you just keep digging the dirt out from under you in the hole you’re already standing in when you keep trying to limit the repercussions to the amount of information that you’re HOPING and PRAYING is all they have on you.

Andrew Weiner

This is how Andrew Weiner went out like a sucker.

If you don’t know who I’m talking about, go read “Weiner Fesses Up”.

Basically.. Dude was sexting or text-flirting or whatever with chicks via social media and tried to send a picture of tha dilznick to some chick on Twitter and accidentally sent it publicly instead of privately.

When he got busted, because you can’t actually delete Twitter posts because people are following you by RSS and receiving your media in their EMAIL instead of using a Twitter client, he went on television and told talk show hosts something to the effect of “We’re not sure that that’s me in the pictures.” :/

First of all.. Who is “We”? :D

Second, you know whether you own underwear that looks like that or you don’t.

Third, you know whether you took pictures of your underwear or you didn’t.

Fourth, you know whether you tried to send said picture to some chick and ****** up.

So, by the time people are not only TELLING YOU they have your picture in their possession, but it’s actually being shown on the television news in cities across the United States of America, it’s time to abandon Rolling Disclosure and admit what actually happened.

Instead.. Weiner decided that there must be some way out of this, and elected to lie on television, which made him look worse than his original offense, which wasn’t an offense at all, because the pic of that dilznick that he accidentally sent to the Twitter-viewing public, he had been trying to send to a grown-ass woman, in full compliance with the law.

Yes, Weiner happened also to be married, but it’s STILL not against the law to send pictures of tha dilznick to some other chick(s), and I’m rather sure it wasn’t in his marriage vows to begin with.. even though, after him and Tiger Woods and a couple of other dudes have been caught out there gettin’ their internet GROOVE on, I’m sure women are going to start demanding some kind of online fidelity vows in the near future! >:D

Herman Cain

This brings us to this week’s news.. Herman Cain.

If you’re reading this in the future.. Back in 2011 AD, Herman Cain was this dude that rich people gave a bunch of money so he could hang around the Republican Presidential Candidate race and sell books.

A couple of days ago, it was revealed that ~12 years ago, a couple of chicks (meaning more than one chick, not that the chicks were a couple, hehe) had some kind of issue with him which has been labeled as “Sexual Harassment”. I talked about the situation here.

I am personally the KING of “sexual harassment”, so let me give y’all dudes a few tips.

First of all, if a chick doesn’t like you, don’t flirt with her.

I mean, you *CAN*, and you can see what you can do, but it’s an uphill battle that usually yields no rewards whatsoever, or at least you have to put in so much work, time and energy to get the slightest bit of ANYTHING out of the chick that you would have been better off utilizing the time working on your startup or hiring a hooker.

Second, if you’re in a work situation, play it the **** OFF as if you’re not sexually attracted to her.

There’s getting chicks, and there’s getting money. If you’re a gigolo, you do both at the same time. If you’re not, save the chick stuff for after work, and limit it to women that you don’t have to see every day if you don’t end up getting on…… or women you don’t have to see every day if you *DO* get on, and end up being a 2-Minute Brotha, and then you have to endure her looking at you sideways every day like “PSSSSS… He Ain’t ****! :/”

Third, if your job description in the company is more important than hers, make sure you AVOID kickin’ it to her at all costs.

Even if you’re not directly above her in the company hierarchy, it will be alleged that you have influence over her boss, who has influence over her, so you indirectly have some kind of say over her job security and coerced her into messing with you.

Fourth, try your damnedest not to kick it with drunk chicks, even though they’re the ones that make themselves the most available to you.

The problem is that you don’t know how an individual’s brain processes alcohol and how it processes events that occur DURING the time that they’re inebriated.

You can be kickin’ it with, flirting with, and making out with a chick one minute, and then, like three minutes later, you go to hug her and she’s like “WHAT THE **** ARE YOU DOING??? :O”

It’s a real mess, looking into a chick’s eyes and realizing she has zero recollection of the past 10 minutes that you had been messing with her.

It’s pretty pathetic, actually. I can laugh about it because it hasn’t actually affected my life, other than my getting slapped a few times. Lots of guys have taken INCREDIBLE SHORTS because chicks forgot what actually happened and misreported the facts.

Similarly, dudes have committed unspeakable crimes against women while the guys were under the influence of alcohol, so I’m not making this a one-sided issue. I’m just sayin’.

Anyway… Herman Cain got accused of some kind of sexual impropriety like 12 years ago, when his job description was more important than these two chicks. 10 days before they broke the story, the reporter informed people involved with Cain’s “candidacy” that they were going to drop this. Nobody on his team did anything about it.

When they dropped it, Cain seemed surprised. His natural reaction was Rolling Disclosure.

Keep On Rollin’

First, he didn’t know what they were talking about. Then, he wasn’t aware of any settlements. Then, he was asking for names of chicks that accused him… I mean, it went on and on.

Look. I know what I’m talking about… If a chick claims that you sexually harassed her, there are only two reasons that you’re going to not be aware of who she is and what the situation was.

The first reason is that you’ve never harassed anyone in your life, so anytime that this has come up, you didn’t give it any thought, handed it off to the lawyers, and forgot about it ASAP.

The second reason is that you harass people all the time, so there’s no way that you can pinpoint exactly who they’re talking about.

The latter is what I thought of when I heard Cain asking for the names of the chicks.

If someone asks me if I’ve been arrested for murder, the answer will be “Hells the fuck NO, and anyone that says so is a BULLSHIT-ASS LIAR! >:D”

If someone asks me about a chick’s ass I’ve grabbed, they’re going to have to provide me with what state they’re talking about, what college or party they’re talking about, the approximate year, and a description of the chick’s body, preferably including her hairstyle and the colors she was wearing, but not her name, because there is no way I could possibly pinpoint any one of probably thousands of asses I’ve grabbed in my dating career. >:D

This is why, when Cain was like “Who are you talking about?” I was like “C’MON, SUNN!! :/ You’re playing this the wrong way! :D”

If someone comes to you and says that *TWO* chicks made a big deal that you were harassing them and your company had to legally deal with the situation, you damned well know who they’re talking about, unless you harass chicks EVERY YEAR and you don’t want to cop out to the wrong offense.

The fact that they’re specifically asking you about TWO chicks means that they already have documentation about TWO CHICKS and they’re just seeing if you’re going to fess up or not.

They’re not actually asking you whether you did it. They already know you did it.

Everybody knew that Sammi texted the dude and told him to meet her at the club, because they saw the evidence.

Everybody knew that Weiner sent that pic of that dilznick to Twitter because he sent it to the public, and then lamely tried to imply that his account may have been hacked. :/

Everybody knows that there are two chicks that received a settlement from the company that Herman Cain was an executive in, because they’ve already seen the documents.

In fact.. While Cain was trying to slip and slide his way down the hill of admission, hoping to grab a hold of the mountain before he fell off the cliff, he finally said that he was aware that they gave one of the chicks a severance package that amounted to something like 3 months of her salary………… um.. Not quite, dude.

www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/us/politics/herman-cain-accuser-got-a-years-salary-in-severance-pay.html

WASHINGTON — The National Restaurant Association gave $35,000 — a year’s salary — in severance pay to a female staff member in the late 1990s after an encounter with Herman Cain, its chief executive at the time, made her uncomfortable working there, three people with direct knowledge of the payment said on Tuesday.

The woman was one of two whose accusations of sexual harassment by Mr. Cain, now a Republican candidate for president, led to paid severance agreements during his 1996-99 tenure at the association. Disclosure of the scale of the severance further challenged his initial description of the matter as a “witch hunt,” as did new descriptions from the woman’s friends and colleagues of her level of discomfort at work.

Adding to the pressure on Mr. Cain, a lawyer for the second woman called on the restaurant association to release her from a confidentiality agreement signed as part of her settlement, raising the prospect that she could publicly dispute Mr. Cain’s account of what happened. The lawyer said the confidentiality agreement had left her unable to respond to Mr. Cain’s denials of any inappropriate behavior toward the women.

A full year’s salary, huh?

This brings us to the next point, which I had already made in my previous article about this situation..

In order to get pIZaid, the chicks had to sign NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) which prohibit them from talking about their allegations.

This would *APPEAR* to be carte blanche for Cain to deny the situation, but it isn’t. It really obviously and clearly isn’t, and Cain has now trapped himself by trying to explain away the report by saying that the gesture he made was holding his hand under his chin and the statement he made was that a chick was the same height as his wife.

He’s trapped, because NOW, the chick can publicly say that she’d LIKE TO tell THE REAL STORY, but she’s prohibited by law.

First of all, this indicates that Cain’s story isn’t the truth, according to her.

Second, it’s prompted television interviewers to ask Cain if he would be willing to wave the woman’s liability in the case so she could tell the truth of the situation and put this behind him so he could continue his “candidacy” for the Presidency of the United States of America.

Of course, Cain can’t do that, because when she says something different from what he says, it’s all over… So he did the smart thing and said that it’s not up to him, it’s up to the lawyers for the company that made the settlement… er.. AGREEMENT, as far as he understands the situation. ;)

This won’t really help him, though, because if he’s telling the truth, he’s actually going to publicly call for the lawyers to allow her to speak.

You’re Not Slick

This is one of the ultimate flaws of the Republican attempts at fielding a viable Presidential candidate this cycle. Nobody told them that shutting up isn’t a shield. You look just as guilty by NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTION as you would have looked if you would have answered the question truthfully.

When someone asks Bachmann if she would deport 11.5 million illegal aliens, and she doesn’t answer the question, it’s clear that she would try to do that.

When someone asks Bachmann how she intends to create $2/gallon gasoline in a free-market economy, and she doesn’t answer the question, you know she’s just talking ****.

When someone asks Santorum whether he’d try to reinstate DADT and he flounders all over the place, you know damned well that he’d try to do it.

All I can say for them is that if you ask Ron Paul if he’d dismantle federal agencies, he very gladly and proudly screams “HELLS YEAH, I WOULD!!! >:D”, which is why the Republicans won’t give him any light. He’s putting all the cards on the table, which is valiant, but will never fly in a general Presidential election.

When you ask Romney just about ANYTHING, you can find videotape of him making diametrically opposed statements on this and that, from sneakers to hats. Everybody knows he’ll say anything he has to in order to try to get elected.

So they’re pretty much ALL living by Rolling Disclosure. They’re not going to say that they’ll deport anyone they can find unless they’re ultimately forced to. They’re not going to admit to anything at all, until they have no choice.

So Cain thinks that by playing it off as the domain of the lawyers to deal with, he’s covering himself in this situation. He isn’t. If his story was the same as the chick’s story, he should be publicly CLAMORING for them to allow her to speak, so she can corroborate his story and we can move forward with his so-called “candidacy”.

The problem for Sammi, Weiner and Cain is that Rolling Disclosure makes you look like an idiot and a liar.

The question becomes “Why are you covering up these minor-ass things? o_O”

If that’s not your underwear in the picture, all you have to do is say “That’s not a picture of me. I don’t know who it’s a picture of.”

If you didn’t text someone to come meet you at the club, all you have to say is “I didn’t text that person. There’s no way they have texts from me on their phone. Let’s go confront them right now, and I’ll tell that to their faces.”

If you didn’t sexually harass anyone, all you have to say is “I didn’t sexually harass anyone.”

However… Whether you did it or you didn’t.. If your company shelled out $35,000 USD to some chick who only makes $35,000 USD to give up 52 weeks of the one life she’s ever going to have to live, in order to get her to not talk to the press about what she’s claiming you did to her, you need to fess up about that post-haste.

And by “fess up”, I mean you need to say “This chick accused me of something I didn’t do, and my company’s lawyers decided to pay her off to leave the company and never speak about the situation again.”

Very simple. Just the facts. One basic disclosure, instead of a series of different stories over the course of 48 hours, when your team had 10 days to figure out a strategy to deal with it and you already had 12 years to think about what you’d say if this ever came up in conversation.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• Lie To Me
• Why Consensual Affairs Are More Damaging Than Sexual Harassment
• Sexual Harassment & Inappropriate, Sexually-Suggestive Behavior
• “Jersey Shore” Italy: Walk Like A Duck
• Why Nobody Tells You The Truth

Besides smileys in text messages, bright colors, shiny objects and shoes (not necessarily in that order), women LOVE titles. :D If they mess with a guy long enough, they’re going to want to define their relationship with some kind of word, such as “girlfriend” or “fiancee” or “wife”, etc.

As ‘bad’ as it is for her when her guy won’t tell HER they’re together, it gets even worse in public. When they meet people, he either doesn’t introduce her at all or just says her first name, like any other common friend. The question’s always “Why won’t he tell anyone that we’re dating? :( “. So, ladies… Here are a few potential reasons why your guy won’t claim you as his girlfriend…..

1) Because you’re NOT

Let’s start from the start. :) The way the game works is the guy tries to get laid and you tell him what he’s going to have to trade you for the sex. In some cases, that’s a relationship. A guy has two choices… nod, and go along with whatever you said and get some… or refuse to say he’s working towards a relationship with you and get nothing. Odds are that he’s going to say some variation of “we’re dating” in order to get you to lay down and do the right thing. What this MEANS, however… is

nothing.

Nothing at all. He might be “dating” six of y’all and none of y’all know about the others. So what happens is, while you’re waiting for him to give you a title, he’s having his cake and eating it too. This is why he looks all surprised and caught off guard when you say “Where are we going?” or “What are we to each other?”. He’s scrambling to think of something to say other than “You’re one of the chicks I enjoy having sex with”.

2) He already HAS a wife or girlfriend

This SEEMS to be the same as #1, but it’s worse. :) If you’re one of several chicks that he’s “seeing” ;) , you still have a percentage chance of being the cream that rises to the top. If he already has a woman in the top slot that he never told you about, you can forget about picket fences and two-car garages. If you think this might describe YOUR relationship, go read “Ladies: How To Tell He Has A Girlfriend”.

3) Because he doesn’t have to

How do they say… “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?”… or was that “Why buy the chicken when you can get the eggs for free?”… Anyway… You get the picture. :) If he’s already tapping that, you have ZERO leverage to barter for a promotion. If you can figure out how HE’S going to benefit by calling you his girlfriend, then go for it! :D

Of course, you could always call a sex boycott or embargo, except that’s when you might find out he has more chicks than you “in the pocket”.

4) He doesn’t want to scare off other chicks

Some women have an inability to stick to the facts. When you see a chick you like and ask them “Who’s that?”, they respond “Oh… She has a boyfriend”. Then they stand there as if they adequately responded to your query while you’re thinking “YOU #&(@&%*$ IDIOT! I DIDN’T *ASK* YOU THAT! :( “.

This situation affects guys in exactly the same way. If a guy’s homegirl has a friend who likes him and she asks about the guy, the response she’ll receive is “Oh… He has a girlfriend”, and his game goes down the drain.

In order to avoid this and maximize one’s options… It’s best not to claim any chicks at all so people can MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS and stick to the facts when a chick’s tryinna meet a brotha. :D

5) He’s embarrassed about how you look

Oftentimes… A guy’s standards for a gal he’ll have sex with are LOWER than his standards for a gal he’ll be SEEN with. The fact that he’ll tap that doesn’t mean he’ll go anywhere with you in public… God Forbid being immortalized in pictures with you, EVAR. Even if he’s willing to go out in public with you, it doesn’t mean he’s willing to admit to the depth of your relationship.

Guys are competitive. We all want to be fly and have sex with the hottest chicks. Unfortunately, :D reality doesn’t always match up to fantasy, and a brothaz gotsta DOOOO what a brothaz gotsta DOO! :D Nobody wants to be labeled a “Chubby Chaser” or whatever they call guys that like “Butch” females or whatever other fetishes are going on these days. So while he might very well enjoy hooking up with you behind closed doors, he’s not too likely to admit it to the fellaz and ESPECIALLY not likely to claim you as his exclusive girl.

6) Because his boy already tapped that

For some reason that I’ll most likely NEVER understand, :) women just about universally refuse to believe that guys they have sex with don’t tell their close male friends.

Basically, ladies… You can assume a 16-hour window of privacy… assuming the guy fell asleep for a full 8 hours after he tapped that. The best you can hope for is “Yeah. I hit it”. The worst case… well the WORST case is videotape… but the worst case, normally, is a detailed description of WHERE he hit it (indoors, outdoors, on what furniture/appliance…), WHAT position you were in and HOW MUCH you enjoyed each position.

This being the case… if you insist on dating guys that know each other, they come to the table (dryer, washing machine…) knowing what they can get from you and how much they need to do to get it.

Another unfortunate residual from guys’ competitive nature is that in the case of a chick that several guys have messed with, YOU don’t want to be the one that gets sprung on “Community Property”. Some guys grow out of this and some guys are just glad to be with ANY chick that will give them some at the drop of a hat, so exceptions are made and guys endure the ridicule, funny looks and snide remarks.

For the most part, though… And I’ll NEVER understand this one either… Most guys like to feel that they got their girl “fresh out the box”. It’s part of the competition thing. They like to feel special as if they were the only ones their girl gave it up to. So, for this reason, if you’re currently dating a friend of a guy who already tapped that, and God Forbid… SEVERAL guys that already tapped that, you might have to forget about being claimed as an actual girlfriend and choose a more likely achievement, such as winning the Publisher’s Clearing House Sweepstakes.

DatingGenius

Related Posts

• Fear of Commitment
• Happy Together
• Sluts & Whores
• Ladies: How To Get Over Your Ex-Boyfriend
• The Dog Stays.. You Go.