As horrible as Oxygen Channel’s “Bad Girls Club” was, I still watched it because it was a T&A-fest.

Now, they’ve spun the series off into this lame Flavor-Flav ripoff called “Love Games”, where they have three chicks that ~20 guys are trying to hook up with. As retarded as that premise is, it’s STILL not as useless as putting eight chicks in a house so they can drink alcohol, get undressed most of the time, bitch at each other and then go clubbing together and rub up on each other as if they’re supposed to be lesbians with no storyline and no criteria for ejection from the show. I swear I don’t know how these shows get funded. :/

Nice Shoes.. Wanna ****?

So anyway… I’m fast-forwarding through my DVR copy of “Love Games” and I notice what appears to be a beef, so I back up and play it at regular speed. The chicks and several of the guys are in the hot tub having a conversation and one of the guys says something directly to one of the chicks’ faces to the effect of “All the guys in the house think you have nice tits”.

Of course, the needle scratches on the record and it’s like “GASP! :O”. This is what he gets for telling the truth. This is what he gets for speaking his mind, or in this case, the COLLECTIVE mind. He wasn’t saying that HE was the only one that held that opinion. He put it on all the guys in the house. Because he SAID to her face what everybody else HAD ALREADY SAID BEHIND HER BACK, he was penalized.

So then, when the chicks are trying to decide who to vote off the show, they’re actually there commiserating about “Can you believe he talked about my body??? :O” .. You know, I’m wondering at what level women finally get real. Do you have to be a stripper before you’re willing to understand that guys LIKE, CHECK OUT, TALK ABOUT and WANT your bodies? Is that what it takes? haha I mean, seriously…
How are you gonna be a chick that was only selected to be on a television show because she looks good and guys want to **** you and then you’re going to complain about some guy mentioning that he likes your body? Do you have to be an actual hooker who gets paid for sex before you’re willing to consider and potentially accept the truth?

The funny part is that they weren’t acting. They were actually appalled that this dude said what he said. Meanwhile, that’s the *ONLY* topic of conversation amongst the guys.. Which one of y’all is hotter and which one they’d like to bang FIRST.

I mean, what do you think you were doing on “Bad Girls Club” in the first place? There were NO. MENTAL. CHALLENGES in that show, whatsoever. You were selected because a) you looked good and b) they thought you were mentally disturbed and self-centered enough to cause beef which they could get ratings from. You’re lower even than “Jersey Shore”, because even THEY had to get JOBS and when that chick Angelina refused to work, her ass got kicked off the show.

The only thing that got chicks kicked off of BGC was if they started punching some other chick in the face. No challenges. No eliminations. Your job is to get undressed, drink alcohol, rub up on other girls and talk yang to each other and then you’re SURPRISED and UPSET that dudes are like “She has nice tits”? :/

Lie And Be Happy

The lesson here, gentlemen, is to lie your asses off. Lie, Lie, Lie. You like her ass? Keep it to yourself. Talk about her eyes instead. Chicks fall for that one like hotcakes. You feel like screwing her? Keep it to yourself. Tell her you want to hang out with her and read books or something retarded like that. Chicks like to believe this, so it’s an easy way to sneak your way to the nitty-gritty.

Whatever you do, DON’T bother telling her the truth. Throughout Time Immemorial, guys have been penalized for verbalizing what’s actually going on and destroying women’s ridiculous fantasies about the reason you’re attracted to her. I know you’ll feel dumb saying it, but trust me that it pays off in the long run. The more you mention her body, the more she wants you to focus on her mind or her personality or something else you weren’t paying any attention to. The more you talk about her mind and personality (and whatever else you weren’t paying any attention to) the more she goes “He’s not paying enough attention to my body!!!” and then you’re in there like Belvedere.

I think we also see this female mental process in statements like “I wasn’t wearing a miniskirt.. I was wearing sweats and a hoodie.. How come he tried to get my number?” and “I didn’t tell him I was interested in sex… How come he tried to get my number?”. I’ve come to the conclusion that women are absolutely clueless that the process works without their mental input. Nobody cares whether YOU’RE interested in sex or not. We care if WE’RE interested in hooking up with you or not. Here’s how it works:

We like you, you like us = Stimulation
We like you, you don’t like us = Stimulation
We don’t like you, you don’t like us = No Stimulation
We don’t like you, you like us = Meh… Maybe I’ll take it if I have nothing better to do ;)

Get it? Maybe we need some more equations:

Chick with a nice ass in sweats > chick with no ass in a miniskirt
Chick with a hot body in timberlands and a hoodie > chick with no body dressed “like a hooker”
Dumb chick that looks good > Smart chick that looks bad
and finally.. Chick with nice tits > Chick with not nice tits, which is what got dude on the reality show in trouble.

Hello, Crispus Attucks

Dude figured, either because he was drunk or unfathomably unintelligent, “These hoes know that they’re hoes, so they understand that we’re only here for the T&A and just like the ACTUAL hoes at the strip clubs I frequent, they’re going to take ‘Out of the three girls in the house, you have the nicest tits’ to be a compliment! :D”.

This, of course, triggered the girls who fantasized that all these guys would be chasing them if they were fat and ugly, well… that fantasized that they would have been on a reality show AT ALL if they were fat and ugly, to go “You know what?… Out of all the guys here that perceive us as [insert whatever women think, because I have no clue what it could possibly be], THIS ONE GUY….. THINKS THAT WE’RE *HOES*!!! :O”

Meanwhile, the rest of the dudes look all spiffy because they let him sink by his lonesome. Knowing damned well that they ALL chimed in at one point or another about which chick was the hottest and WHY, they all sat there like “OMG! :O Did you hear what he just said? :O” like it was some mystery or that dude had suddenly flipped his wig and needed to be committed. If she would have taken a poll of the guys that were there at the time as far as what they thought of her body, she would have received shoulder-shrugs and “I hadn’t really thought about it”. That’s because even most CAVEMEN were smart enough not to run out of the cave while the dinosaur was cold lampin’ outside. :D

So then, when dude’s about to get kicked off the show, he recants everything. “I was so wrong.. I was being disrespectful, blah blah blah”. He didn’t get booted and you know the first thing he said to the other guys was “Ha-HAAAA.. The ***** with the nice tits didn’t kick me off the show! :D”.

So the moral of our story is to either lie to women and be happy or tell the truth and take your chances. :D I mean, if you actually DID approach her because of the color of her eyes and you decided to request her number because she’s one of the smartest women you’ve ever met in your life, then roll with that! :D If you thought she was hawt, loved her accent and felt like banging her in the broom closet five minutes after you met her, make sure you mention how nice her hair looks and that you’d love to continue this stimulating conversation over dinner sometime.

Related Posts

• Asking Women Out On Dates
• You’re Still Not Me
• Why You Can’t Get A Boyfriend In NYC
• He’s Lying To You [The Okey-Doke, Part 02]
• Who Is Bob?

I had an interesting conversation last night with a few of the ladies @ this party I went to. It jumped off, because one of them said she should hire a stylist (which is going to be The Kid’s new venture, right after I finish writing this post). Unfortunately for her, she had mentioned earlier in conversation that she had a boyfriend. So I immediately replied:

“Your boyfriend’s supposed to be your stylist.”

She immediately dropped back into this “what’chu talkin’ ’bout, Willis?” pose and was looking at me with this funny expression, so I was like AWWWWW HEEEEERE WE *GO*!!! :D

Her general position was that guys can’t dress girls. I was like “of course they can, because we know what looks good on you and what doesn’t”, to which she replied:

“Men know what looks good on women, but they don’t know WHY it looks good.”

So I stood there for a few seconds, waiting for her to say something that made sense.

…….

That didn’t happen. :)

Here’s the problem with her statement… Looking good is not OBjective, it’s SUBjective. You feel a certain way when you see something that looks good. A painting, a chick, architecture, whatever. Also, what looks good to one person doesn’t necessarily look good to someone else. So… The fact THAT something looks good is way more important than the reason WHY it looks good.

Stephanie Frasco & Bill Cammack

I’m sure you could ask a guy WHY some article of clothing looks good on a chick. You probably won’t get a response for a while, because auxiliary power has been switched to 1) looking, 2) thinking about what he’s looking at and 3) continuing to stand up straight instead of falling over. After that, he may or may not be able to give you a technical description of WHY that item looks good on her, but the fact remains that “WHY” doesn’t matter. All that matters is that he receives the proper physical stimulus from checking her out. :)

So anyway, I tried to inform her that she didn’t know what she was talking about. I think the next thing I asked was:

“So your man doesn’t buy clothes for you?”

Same “what’chu talkin’ ’bout, Willis?” pose + weirdo stare. :) That’s when The Kid realized he wasn’t going to get anywhere with this as a one-on-one conversation and opened the floor to some nearby females. At least there was a range of responses. One said that her man bought clothes for her, but then equated that to him being domineering and posessive. Another one agreed with the first one, that men can’t buy clothes for women. A third one said that she had been with a guy who would buy her clothes sporadically. Needless to say, this had ZERO effect on the original gal’s perspective, which is why, as of today, I am now a personal shopper…. or shopping assistant….. or whatever the title is of people that get paid to tell people what to wear, hahaha :D

As my first oficial act of … hmm. I guess this makes me ShoppingGenius! :D

As my first official act as ShoppingGenius, I will now inform the fellaz on how to dress your girlfriends…..

First of all, the most important thing is knowing how SHE likes to dress in the first place. This is important because you want her to WEAR what you buy for her. If she likes to dress like a dude, don’t pick up a sun dress for her. If she likes to dress like Little House on the Prarie, don’t buy her modern clothing. You have to find out what your parameters are, and then select appealing gear inside that range.

Second, you have to know her size. This is important because you want her to be ABLE TO WEAR what you buy for her. :) Being that she’s your girlfriend, at some point in time, you should have access to her clothes when they’re not attached to her body. Write down her measurements, or twitter them to yourself. Make sure you do this while she’s asleep or in the shower. You know how chicks get with hallucinating about their actual size, or at least lying TO YOU about what it is. This is why you’re not going to ASK HER what her sizes are. She’ll give you the sizes she wishes she was, and not the sizes of clothes she can actually fit in. This reminds me… use your judgement. If your girl loves to stuff herself in jeans, creating unnecessary Muffin-Tops, make sure you increase the value of the sizes you retrieved from her gear.

Also, buying clothes for chicks is seasonal. If you go out with one for an entire year, you’ll notice they tend to get more and less “liquid”. This is, of course, unless they actually diligently monitor their physical condition, which is optimal! :D Anyway, you have to know where your girl currently is with her volume fluctuation. VOLUME is the key thing here, not weight, which is why it’s so funny that chicks always talk about “I need to lose 5 pounds” “I need to lose 10 pounds”, when who cares how much you weigh, when you don’t LOOK any better? So make sure you err on the high side of her volume, or else she’ll only be able to wear the gear in like three month cycles.

Now, you might be wondering… “Why in the hell would *I* want to dress my chick?” :) Well… Why did you buy that fancy car? Why do you work your ass off all day to get some money? Why did you go to the gym to work off all that beer that you drank? The same way you’re hooking YOURSELF up, you should be hooking YOUR GIRL up. There are a few reasons for this…

Women tend to confuse “a clothing item which looks cute” with “a clothing item which looks cute ON THEM”. How many times have you seen/heard women compliment another woman that looks absolutely HORRENDOUS in some gear that doesn’t fit her? It’s not that they’re being polite. They actually believe it looks good, I guess because of the colors or the fabric? \o/ … If your girl has this problem, you need to help her out with her clothing selection.

Did you ever notice how Presidential candidates are always married? This is because (amongst OTHER reasons, hahahahaha) guys are judged by their chicks. If you Pair Bond with a chick, you’re saying “this is the best I can do”. Having your chick look better, rather than worse, is ALWAYS in your best interest.

On a personal note, you want your girl to look good because she should ALWAYS catalyze you to think/feel “Yes, Yes… Yes Sir… Cain’t wait to tap that, sunnnnnnn :D “. If you let your girl walk around like a slovenly hippie bum, she’s not going to inspire you… causing you to interact with her more platonically than you’re supposed to and your entire physical relationship to her is less efficient/effective than it should be. The better SHE looks, the more into her YOU’RE going to be, and the more SHE’S going to be into how into her YOU are.

One more thing is, you don’t want to overdo it hahaha :) You’re buying her clothes to go out in the street in, not to model for you in your own crib (which is another issue, entirely). You want her to look good, but not like a professional hooker. Actually… if SHE tends to overdo her gear, buy her some conservative clothing that still looks hawt on her. The first benefit here is that if your girl looks too good, drunk dudes tend to act like AssHats and you might get in a beef over it. Second, you don’t want to tip the “fail scale” and go from “damn… his girl looks HAWT!” to “I know he’s paying her” (as in, he’s a customer). Third, you want it to be gear that she’s comfortable wearing, and some chicks just aren’t comfortable with how attractive they really are.

So now you’re ready. Sneak her measurements. Add at least +2 to all of them. Hit stores that are along the lines of gear she likes to wear, except buy GOOD-LOOKING ish. Surprise her with her presents, then go sport your new & improved chick around town.

PS – You do NOT want to tell her HOW you were able to buy clothes for her that fit perfectly. Make up something romantic like “baby, I’ve held you so many times, I just knew…. :D ”

So go out there and make it happen. Remember…

DiY, or your girl’s going to pay me YOUR MONEY to do your job for you. :D

ShoppingGenius

Related Posts

• How to avoid having sex with your BUSTED girlfriend
• Sluts & Whores
• How To Get Over Your Ex-Girlfriend
• Tech Stole Your Girlfriend!
• How to Argue With a Woman… and Win!

Reader Derek writes:

There are people out in the public eye that grabs your attention.

Using the “Dating Genius” tried and proven methods, how can someone make any good of this? Generically and academically speaking, mind you.

Actually, this is a very good question, Derek.

Becoming enamored with public figures happens to people all day, every day. That’s why the tabloids make so much money. Everyone’s interested in what their favorite celebrities are doing and saying as well as whom they’re currently dating.

There are two ‘problems’ with this. The first one is that you’re not getting the full experience of a person by watching their show. The second is that you usually don’t have any local access to the person in question, so you never get to experience what they’re really like.

Because of this, what people ‘fall in love’ with is only 1% of the actual person at best… unless they’re doing a personal videoblog where they’re authentically telling you about themselves, their lives, what they think and feel.

For example… I have a friend that’s very PHYSICALLY attractive… very beautiful, but her personality is so *CRASS* that I can’t imagine anyone wanting to date her for who she is as a person. Guys put up with her shenanigans because she’s an easy lay. Other than that, she doesn’t have any wins… None of them are actually “WITH” her. You could take that chick and make her the host of a television show or internet show, and guys would be ‘falling in love’ with her too, but that’s because she’d be reading a script and her true personality wouldn’t be revealed at all by what she’s saying.

There’s actually a third ‘problem’ with celebrity crushes… You’re not the only one.

Depending on your level of taste in women, there could be easily 100, 1,000 or 1,000,000 guys that ‘fell in love’ with her for the exact same reasons that you did, so even if she’s available and you have local access to her, it’s gonna be an uphill climb to get on.

DatingGenius

Related Posts

• Does it matter what women think?
• Celebrity Crush, Part 2
• Check out her moms!!! :O
• L.A. Women
• Pretty Girls – Too Unapproachable?

Rick writes: (in response to Pretty Girls – Too Unapproachable?)

I don’t think you see a lot of that where I live in Los Angeles. There are a lot of attractive people here… maybe that’s why. Sadly that also means a lot of superficiality. Hence, rarely a 3rd or 4th date. Looks are important, don’t get me wrong, but substance makes a relationship.

You may be right about that, Rick.

I don’t know anything about LA, but I’ve heard it’s the toughest scene in the USA! :D A female friend of mine was out there for ~ 9 months and never got a date… Well… Then again, she’s not PRIME, hahaha so I really wouldn’t have expected people to choose her over the model-type waitress/acress chicks in LA. :)

Anyway, yes… In an environment where there are a lot of attractive people, it’s a completely different dynamic. It really doesn’t matter which one you hook up with, because they’re all hot. Now… Ease on down the road to Middle America and the “hot percentage” takes an incredible dive. :O If you don’t pull one of the few attractive girls in your small town, you may as well move! :D

I also agree with the massive attractiveness being a cause of superficiality…. for the guys as well as the girls. When you know you can pick up another chick the next time you walk out in the street, there’s no need to keep one chick or date her over and over. There’s also no reason to keep going out with her if she seems like she doesn’t want to have sex with you because it’s faster to meet a different chick that actually wants to get with you than it is to change the current girl’s mind about getting with the program.

From the females’ point of view, there are so many guys throwing goods and services at them that there’s no need to settle on ONE, unless she’s sure that this is the guy she wants to spend a lot of time with. They used to have a dating show on, and I forget the name of it, something like “Single in New York”, where they followed these girls on date after date on the same day. One time, the cameras caught when one of them got out of a car, being dropped off late by one date, and when she hit the street, her other date was standing there waiting for her, hahaha. She had to hustle upstairs, change, freshen up and go out with the next guy, ASAP.

Also, people seem to go to Los Angeles to “make it big”. I’m sure it becomes in image thing as far as whom you’re dating. Guys in that situation have no choice but to hit on the hottest girls they could find in order to increase or maintain their prestige. No time for the hot girls to get lonely in THAT environment! :D

DatingGenius

Related Posts

• Pretty Girls – Too Unapproachable?
• Does it matter what women think?
• Thou Shalt Not Drink Soda With Pop Rocks!
• Purely Looks
• Tips For The Ladies

re: Tricia Wang’s “Web 2.0 Vigilante”

Interesting points, Tricia.

First of all, I think the “fact” that Ryanne is white (she looks white, so I’ll assume she’s white) is less important here than you make it out to be. “Jim Crow” is about “you are black, so don’t interact with white chicks”. IMO, this situation would have gone the exact same way if the construction workers had all been white. I have no reason to assume that Ryanne would have let white guys slide, so there’s the immediate difference between “Jim Crow” and this situation.

I also have no reason to believe that she KNOWS anything about “black culture” in order to “ignore” it, as you called it. Ignoring it implies an understanding of the differences and then not applying that understanding to your judgement. Having said that, you’re absolutely right that there’s a different dynamic in minority neighborhoods where chicks are “holla’ed at” all day, every day, going to and from work, the store, the gym, wherever. I’m not saying this is a good thing. I agree with you that whatever was being said was probably in some form of social jest, whether positive or negative. As someone pointed out in the comments on the original post, we don’t get to hear what was actually said. We hear Ryanne’s account of what she heard, which was “woof woof” and “hey slim”. Depending on the context, those remarks could be an indication that they thought she was attractive or that they thought she was unattractive. Either way, she felt disrespected, and it’s clear on the tape that she’s affected and upset. I’m sure there are quite a few minority women that get game kicked to them all day, every day that are more sick of it than she is, and would like to do the same thing, if they thought it would do them any good.

The signal of future punishment was clear. Again, I think the construction guys being black isn’t as important as you make it out to be. If she had taped Italians in Bensonhurst, you wouldn’t have written this article at all.

As far as web 2.0 vigilantes, you bring up some good points. I hadn’t heard of gaettongnyeo before today. I think that’s a fine example of retribution getting out of hand. Did the girl deserve to be shamed? Of course. She let the dog “make a mess” on the subway, and then refused to clean it up as if it wasn’t her fault. According to reports, there were “elders” around, who told her to clean it up, and she STILL didn’t (major error #2). So they took her picture and she got embarrassed. That’s good for her. She won’t be pulling stunts like that in the future. :) However… There are at least two problems with the HollaBack technique… well… three, if you count the one you bring up at the end of your post.

Problem #1 is for the harasser, or in this case, the harassers. In the cases where guys do egregious stuff like they outline on the HollaBack sites, they’re getting what they deserve. I think there should definitely be some way that women can make themselves feel more safe or make habitual harassers known to others in the neighborhood so they can be aware. There are other situations where women didn’t like being called “baby” or being looked at from across he boulevard. I’m not sure that all the offenses warrant the same treatment/cagegorization. By posting these guys’ (I can say guys, because I didn’t see any pictures of lesbian harassers on those sites) faces to the net, they’re being seen as ‘guilty’ merely on the say-so of the poster. What happens now if someone’s boss’ wife goes on the site… or if their boss happens to be a woman and goes on the site herself and sees him and the description of whatever it is he’s supposed to have done? What if he gets fired because he tried to meet a chick he thought was attractive in the street, and thought he was kicking it to her in the expected fashion by calling her beautiful or asking if he can walk with her? What happens if this guy’s married and his wife sees what was posted about him and his relationship gets messed up? What happens in a group situation like in Ryanne’s video? What if one or more of the guys in the shot didn’t have jack to do with the harassment, but there they are on tape with everyone else? What happens if the boss sees this and decides to sanction everyone there, since there’s no telling who said what? You might be saying “So what? If extra stuff happens to them, that’s what they get for harassing!”… Well… “So what?” is Problem #2.

Problem #2 is for the woman taking the picture. What if the guy you take a picture of is on parole and wasn’t supposed to leave VA, but you take a picture of him in NYC? What if the guy doesn’t want his wife to see him on the net… or his boss to see him on the net? What if the guy just plain doesn’t like the fact that you took a picture of him and decides to do something about it?

Problem #3 is what Tricia states towards the end:

Sites like hollabacknyc.blogspot.com/ are passive in the documentation and function to empower the woman who posts a picture of her cat caller. The cat caller is never truly confronted for his behavior, therefore it’s not really effective in preventing harassment as there is no true confrontation.

This is true. The cat caller isn’t confronted at all. From the women’s own reports, most of the time there’s some yelling, or maybe someone gives someone the finger. Other than that, nothing happens. Sometimes, they say to the harasser that they’re going to put him on the net. Some of the pictures are from very far away or the back of some guy’s head or a picture of his car that’s parked somewhere… The sites are more for venting than anything else, and that’s very useful for women who don’t want to feel like they’re the only ones stuff like this happens to. The reason this is a problem is that the end may not justify the means if the taking of the picture makes a bad situation much worse than it originally was for the picture-taker. It certainly doesn’t justify the means if the camera’s confiscated by the harasser.

Anyway… Everybody knows women are going to be shouted at as they’re passing construction sites. It’s a pastime as much as having a beer or watching sports. That doesn’t mean Ryanne has to accept that for herself. The guys in the video, black, white, whatever, are not hanging out on crates in front of a closed storefront. They are working. This means they have a supervisor, and that supervisor has a supervisor and that supervisor has a supervisor. Somewhere along the line, there’s someone with the ability to impose sanctions on those guys for “misrepresenting” the construction company… even if the owner is the most sexist guy out of all of them. :) I think the workers have more of a responsibility to know that they could get in trouble for yelling either compliments or insults at a woman walking by the site more than Ryanne has a responsibility to understand minorities’ different style of being friendly or socializing.

Related Posts

• Life Isn’t Fair
• It’s The End of The World as We Know It! :(
• Thou Shalt Not Drink Soda With Pop Rocks!
• Context / Locker-Room Conversation
• Excuses, Excuses