So I’m watching this MSNBC show, “Hardball”, and this dude, Chris Matthews is talking about Herman Cain and he uses this really great term.. “Rolling Disclosure”! :D hahahaha Oh Man, that perfectly describes what I’ve been wanting to write about.

Rolling Disclosure

Rolling Disclosure is when you only give up as much information as you think the person asking you the questions can actually prove.

Most of the time, this happens to me with women, and the discussion goes essentially exactly like this:

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I didn’t go out.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I stayed home and had a glass of wine.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I stayed home and drank a bottle of wine.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I went out with my girlfriends.. Girls’ Night Out! :D

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I met a guy while I was out with the girls.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I went home with the guy I met at the bar.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: He tried to kiss me, but I was like “No”. :D

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: We made out, but he didn’t **** me.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I arrived home at 7am, when I had left the bar at 3am.

Me: How’d Friday night go?

Her: I never came so much in my entire life!!! >:D

So you can see how annoying this is.. Waiting for chicks to tell you the actual truth about their evening, instead of trying to bullshit you and avoid getting caught up in the “She’s Easy” sexual double standard.

Meanwhile, your credibility is SHOT. Kaput. Finished.

From now on, when you say “I stayed at home and drank a glass of wine”, I assume you got reamed out by some dude, and that’s a good thing! :D I’m happy for you! More power to ya! haha Get In Where You Fit In!!! >:D

Sammi

This happened to Sammi from “Jersey Shore”.

I’m not going to go over the whole situation, because I already wrote about it in “Girls Don’t Have Friends That Are Guys”, but the main point is that she texted this dude to come meet her at a club, and Nicole confronted her and asked her who she texted.

Sammi insisted that she didn’t text any dudes until Nicole informed her that a) the dude was there in the club, and b) she had already seen the texts from Sammi on his Blackberry.

Sammi immediately changed her story from “I didn’t text any guys” to “I texted him, but he’s just a friend.”

She held the line with her rolling disclosure until she finally had to admit that she had messed with him before, because he was prepared to give the play-by-play of what he did with her, where, and when, to her current boyfriend, Ronnie.

The thing about Rolling Disclosure is that you have to wonder why people are asking you certain questions. You have to wonder why someone would ask you WHO you texted instead of asking you IF you texted anyone. o_O

Once this happens to you, it’s in your best interests to assume they know everything, and give up the ghost ASAP.

You’re totally better off fessin’ up, because you just keep digging the dirt out from under you in the hole you’re already standing in when you keep trying to limit the repercussions to the amount of information that you’re HOPING and PRAYING is all they have on you.

Andrew Weiner

This is how Andrew Weiner went out like a sucker.

If you don’t know who I’m talking about, go read “Weiner Fesses Up”.

Basically.. Dude was sexting or text-flirting or whatever with chicks via social media and tried to send a picture of tha dilznick to some chick on Twitter and accidentally sent it publicly instead of privately.

When he got busted, because you can’t actually delete Twitter posts because people are following you by RSS and receiving your media in their EMAIL instead of using a Twitter client, he went on television and told talk show hosts something to the effect of “We’re not sure that that’s me in the pictures.” :/

First of all.. Who is “We”? :D

Second, you know whether you own underwear that looks like that or you don’t.

Third, you know whether you took pictures of your underwear or you didn’t.

Fourth, you know whether you tried to send said picture to some chick and ****** up.

So, by the time people are not only TELLING YOU they have your picture in their possession, but it’s actually being shown on the television news in cities across the United States of America, it’s time to abandon Rolling Disclosure and admit what actually happened.

Instead.. Weiner decided that there must be some way out of this, and elected to lie on television, which made him look worse than his original offense, which wasn’t an offense at all, because the pic of that dilznick that he accidentally sent to the Twitter-viewing public, he had been trying to send to a grown-ass woman, in full compliance with the law.

Yes, Weiner happened also to be married, but it’s STILL not against the law to send pictures of tha dilznick to some other chick(s), and I’m rather sure it wasn’t in his marriage vows to begin with.. even though, after him and Tiger Woods and a couple of other dudes have been caught out there gettin’ their internet GROOVE on, I’m sure women are going to start demanding some kind of online fidelity vows in the near future! >:D

Herman Cain

This brings us to this week’s news.. Herman Cain.

If you’re reading this in the future.. Back in 2011 AD, Herman Cain was this dude that rich people gave a bunch of money so he could hang around the Republican Presidential Candidate race and sell books.

A couple of days ago, it was revealed that ~12 years ago, a couple of chicks (meaning more than one chick, not that the chicks were a couple, hehe) had some kind of issue with him which has been labeled as “Sexual Harassment”. I talked about the situation here.

I am personally the KING of “sexual harassment”, so let me give y’all dudes a few tips.

First of all, if a chick doesn’t like you, don’t flirt with her.

I mean, you *CAN*, and you can see what you can do, but it’s an uphill battle that usually yields no rewards whatsoever, or at least you have to put in so much work, time and energy to get the slightest bit of ANYTHING out of the chick that you would have been better off utilizing the time working on your startup or hiring a hooker.

Second, if you’re in a work situation, play it the **** OFF as if you’re not sexually attracted to her.

There’s getting chicks, and there’s getting money. If you’re a gigolo, you do both at the same time. If you’re not, save the chick stuff for after work, and limit it to women that you don’t have to see every day if you don’t end up getting on…… or women you don’t have to see every day if you *DO* get on, and end up being a 2-Minute Brotha, and then you have to endure her looking at you sideways every day like “PSSSSS… He Ain’t ****! :/”

Third, if your job description in the company is more important than hers, make sure you AVOID kickin’ it to her at all costs.

Even if you’re not directly above her in the company hierarchy, it will be alleged that you have influence over her boss, who has influence over her, so you indirectly have some kind of say over her job security and coerced her into messing with you.

Fourth, try your damnedest not to kick it with drunk chicks, even though they’re the ones that make themselves the most available to you.

The problem is that you don’t know how an individual’s brain processes alcohol and how it processes events that occur DURING the time that they’re inebriated.

You can be kickin’ it with, flirting with, and making out with a chick one minute, and then, like three minutes later, you go to hug her and she’s like “WHAT THE **** ARE YOU DOING??? :O”

It’s a real mess, looking into a chick’s eyes and realizing she has zero recollection of the past 10 minutes that you had been messing with her.

It’s pretty pathetic, actually. I can laugh about it because it hasn’t actually affected my life, other than my getting slapped a few times. Lots of guys have taken INCREDIBLE SHORTS because chicks forgot what actually happened and misreported the facts.

Similarly, dudes have committed unspeakable crimes against women while the guys were under the influence of alcohol, so I’m not making this a one-sided issue. I’m just sayin’.

Anyway… Herman Cain got accused of some kind of sexual impropriety like 12 years ago, when his job description was more important than these two chicks. 10 days before they broke the story, the reporter informed people involved with Cain’s “candidacy” that they were going to drop this. Nobody on his team did anything about it.

When they dropped it, Cain seemed surprised. His natural reaction was Rolling Disclosure.

Keep On Rollin’

First, he didn’t know what they were talking about. Then, he wasn’t aware of any settlements. Then, he was asking for names of chicks that accused him… I mean, it went on and on.

Look. I know what I’m talking about… If a chick claims that you sexually harassed her, there are only two reasons that you’re going to not be aware of who she is and what the situation was.

The first reason is that you’ve never harassed anyone in your life, so anytime that this has come up, you didn’t give it any thought, handed it off to the lawyers, and forgot about it ASAP.

The second reason is that you harass people all the time, so there’s no way that you can pinpoint exactly who they’re talking about.

The latter is what I thought of when I heard Cain asking for the names of the chicks.

If someone asks me if I’ve been arrested for murder, the answer will be “Hells the fuck NO, and anyone that says so is a BULLSHIT-ASS LIAR! >:D”

If someone asks me about a chick’s ass I’ve grabbed, they’re going to have to provide me with what state they’re talking about, what college or party they’re talking about, the approximate year, and a description of the chick’s body, preferably including her hairstyle and the colors she was wearing, but not her name, because there is no way I could possibly pinpoint any one of probably thousands of asses I’ve grabbed in my dating career. >:D

This is why, when Cain was like “Who are you talking about?” I was like “C’MON, SUNN!! :/ You’re playing this the wrong way! :D”

If someone comes to you and says that *TWO* chicks made a big deal that you were harassing them and your company had to legally deal with the situation, you damned well know who they’re talking about, unless you harass chicks EVERY YEAR and you don’t want to cop out to the wrong offense.

The fact that they’re specifically asking you about TWO chicks means that they already have documentation about TWO CHICKS and they’re just seeing if you’re going to fess up or not.

They’re not actually asking you whether you did it. They already know you did it.

Everybody knew that Sammi texted the dude and told him to meet her at the club, because they saw the evidence.

Everybody knew that Weiner sent that pic of that dilznick to Twitter because he sent it to the public, and then lamely tried to imply that his account may have been hacked. :/

Everybody knows that there are two chicks that received a settlement from the company that Herman Cain was an executive in, because they’ve already seen the documents.

In fact.. While Cain was trying to slip and slide his way down the hill of admission, hoping to grab a hold of the mountain before he fell off the cliff, he finally said that he was aware that they gave one of the chicks a severance package that amounted to something like 3 months of her salary………… um.. Not quite, dude.

www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/us/politics/herman-cain-accuser-got-a-years-salary-in-severance-pay.html

WASHINGTON — The National Restaurant Association gave $35,000 — a year’s salary — in severance pay to a female staff member in the late 1990s after an encounter with Herman Cain, its chief executive at the time, made her uncomfortable working there, three people with direct knowledge of the payment said on Tuesday.

The woman was one of two whose accusations of sexual harassment by Mr. Cain, now a Republican candidate for president, led to paid severance agreements during his 1996-99 tenure at the association. Disclosure of the scale of the severance further challenged his initial description of the matter as a “witch hunt,” as did new descriptions from the woman’s friends and colleagues of her level of discomfort at work.

Adding to the pressure on Mr. Cain, a lawyer for the second woman called on the restaurant association to release her from a confidentiality agreement signed as part of her settlement, raising the prospect that she could publicly dispute Mr. Cain’s account of what happened. The lawyer said the confidentiality agreement had left her unable to respond to Mr. Cain’s denials of any inappropriate behavior toward the women.

A full year’s salary, huh?

This brings us to the next point, which I had already made in my previous article about this situation..

In order to get pIZaid, the chicks had to sign NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) which prohibit them from talking about their allegations.

This would *APPEAR* to be carte blanche for Cain to deny the situation, but it isn’t. It really obviously and clearly isn’t, and Cain has now trapped himself by trying to explain away the report by saying that the gesture he made was holding his hand under his chin and the statement he made was that a chick was the same height as his wife.

He’s trapped, because NOW, the chick can publicly say that she’d LIKE TO tell THE REAL STORY, but she’s prohibited by law.

First of all, this indicates that Cain’s story isn’t the truth, according to her.

Second, it’s prompted television interviewers to ask Cain if he would be willing to wave the woman’s liability in the case so she could tell the truth of the situation and put this behind him so he could continue his “candidacy” for the Presidency of the United States of America.

Of course, Cain can’t do that, because when she says something different from what he says, it’s all over… So he did the smart thing and said that it’s not up to him, it’s up to the lawyers for the company that made the settlement… er.. AGREEMENT, as far as he understands the situation. ;)

This won’t really help him, though, because if he’s telling the truth, he’s actually going to publicly call for the lawyers to allow her to speak.

You’re Not Slick

This is one of the ultimate flaws of the Republican attempts at fielding a viable Presidential candidate this cycle. Nobody told them that shutting up isn’t a shield. You look just as guilty by NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTION as you would have looked if you would have answered the question truthfully.

When someone asks Bachmann if she would deport 11.5 million illegal aliens, and she doesn’t answer the question, it’s clear that she would try to do that.

When someone asks Bachmann how she intends to create $2/gallon gasoline in a free-market economy, and she doesn’t answer the question, you know she’s just talking ****.

When someone asks Santorum whether he’d try to reinstate DADT and he flounders all over the place, you know damned well that he’d try to do it.

All I can say for them is that if you ask Ron Paul if he’d dismantle federal agencies, he very gladly and proudly screams “HELLS YEAH, I WOULD!!! >:D”, which is why the Republicans won’t give him any light. He’s putting all the cards on the table, which is valiant, but will never fly in a general Presidential election.

When you ask Romney just about ANYTHING, you can find videotape of him making diametrically opposed statements on this and that, from sneakers to hats. Everybody knows he’ll say anything he has to in order to try to get elected.

So they’re pretty much ALL living by Rolling Disclosure. They’re not going to say that they’ll deport anyone they can find unless they’re ultimately forced to. They’re not going to admit to anything at all, until they have no choice.

So Cain thinks that by playing it off as the domain of the lawyers to deal with, he’s covering himself in this situation. He isn’t. If his story was the same as the chick’s story, he should be publicly CLAMORING for them to allow her to speak, so she can corroborate his story and we can move forward with his so-called “candidacy”.

The problem for Sammi, Weiner and Cain is that Rolling Disclosure makes you look like an idiot and a liar.

The question becomes “Why are you covering up these minor-ass things? o_O”

If that’s not your underwear in the picture, all you have to do is say “That’s not a picture of me. I don’t know who it’s a picture of.”

If you didn’t text someone to come meet you at the club, all you have to say is “I didn’t text that person. There’s no way they have texts from me on their phone. Let’s go confront them right now, and I’ll tell that to their faces.”

If you didn’t sexually harass anyone, all you have to say is “I didn’t sexually harass anyone.”

However… Whether you did it or you didn’t.. If your company shelled out $35,000 USD to some chick who only makes $35,000 USD to give up 52 weeks of the one life she’s ever going to have to live, in order to get her to not talk to the press about what she’s claiming you did to her, you need to fess up about that post-haste.

And by “fess up”, I mean you need to say “This chick accused me of something I didn’t do, and my company’s lawyers decided to pay her off to leave the company and never speak about the situation again.”

Very simple. Just the facts. One basic disclosure, instead of a series of different stories over the course of 48 hours, when your team had 10 days to figure out a strategy to deal with it and you already had 12 years to think about what you’d say if this ever came up in conversation.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• Why Consensual Affairs Are More Damaging Than Sexual Harassment
• Sexual Harassment & Inappropriate, Sexually-Suggestive Behavior
• “Jersey Shore” Italy: Walk Like A Duck
• Why Nobody Tells You The Truth
• Confidence & Success

I had brought this up before.. about how Sammi’s brain doesn’t cope well with information she doesn’t like.

When Ronnie told her it was over, she asked him like 85 different times to confirm it in at least 97,000 different ways before it finally sank in that he was serious and their “relationship” was over.

This week, Sammi’s lack of brainpower MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second) bit her in the ass….. HARD! :D HAHAHA

When you’re interrogating someone, the best thing to do is ask questions that you already know the answer to.

If I ask you “Did you go straight home?” and you say “Yes” and then I ask you “Did you go straight home?”, it’s in your best interest to consider that a) I don’t believe you, and b) I probably know something you didn’t think I knew.

This is what happened to Sammi. Nicole pulled her to the side, and with a stern look on her grill, asked “What’s the guy you’ve been texting?”, to which, Sammi replied “I don’t text ANYBODY!”, and then Nicole asked Deena what the guy’s name was.

It’s right at that point in time that your brain is supposed to inform you that you’re busted. Instead, Sammi continued to deny. This is because, like I said the other day, people’s word isn’t worth **** anymore, and she’s used to saying and doing anything she wants and nobody’s worthless opinion trumps hers.

Unfortunately for her, this time, there was physical evidence.. Text messages FROM HER to the guy, on his phone, that came from her account, and had her picture attached to the messages.

Busted.

Background

Basically, Sammi & Ronnie have been dating since the beginning of season 01, or about a full year. In season 02, Ronnie “cheated” on Sammi a bunch of times and she pretended to get over it so she could look cool, but it was actually driving her crazy.

They broke up a couple of episodes ago, after Ronnie told her it was over, so Sammi thought it would be a good idea to take Nicole & Deena’s advice and dress up, go to the club and rub her ass on some other dude so Ronnie could watch and feel jealous.

Ronnie proceeded to stroll home and destroy all of her belongings, including her prescription glasses, so she ended up going home.

Sammi came back relatively quickly. I think they said on the show that she was gone for a week or so.

Upon her return, she and Ronnie got back together, naturally, because they have nothing better to do with their lives.

The problem is that apparently, as soon as she went home, while Ronnie was crying about her and ordering flowers sent to her house, Sammi started texting this guy that arrived at the club and was the flashpoint for the ensuing ruckus.

Instead of fessing up, she tried to play it off and failed miserably.

Sammi was in the right to text the dude and invite him to come see her, because she and Ronnie had broken up before she left the house, so she was absolutely single. However.. Ronnie expected her to not to kick it to some rebound dude the very next day.

When Sammi returned, she could have admitted it, but elected not to.

In fact, she was actually dumb enough to go to the club that she texted the guy to meet her at. This is what happens when someone who’s used to being a girlfriend tries to do treacherous, sneaky things. It normally doesn’t work out because she doesn’t have any practice in it.

So she doesn’t admit she was texting some other dude, gets back together with Ronnie, and goes WITH RONNIE to the club that she had told the other guy to meet her at (being that she had been single at the time).

Actually, what’s even dumber about what happened is that she KNEW that the guy she was texting was friends with Mike “The Snitchuation”, the neighborhood gossip & town crier.. Absolutely THE WORST PERSON that she could have had knowing her personal business.

Beginning Of The End

So dude shows up to the bar and asks Mike where Sammi is and announces that she told him to meet her there.

The reason this happened is that Sammi FAILED to send him the “I’m back together with my boyfriend” text message. She FAILED to send him the “Act like you don’t know me” text message. She FAILED to send him the “Don’t **** up my relationship with Ronnie” text message.

So, as far as dude knew, Sammi was still single, and still wanted to see him. He was there to see her and was ready to get it jumpin’ off. >:D

Mike asks him for proof, so dude breaks out his cell phone and scrolls through messages Sammi sent him during the few days she was out of the house / broken up with Ronnie.

In an intelligent move, Mike calls Jenni over and has dude show her the messages. Jenni informs Nicole & Deena about what’s happening, and Nicole decides to run and tell Sammi she’s busted before Ronnie finds out and flips out on her.

Nicole pulls Sammi away from Ronnie, and asks her “What’s the guy you’ve been texting?”

This should have triggered a memory search by Sammi. She should either have wondered “WHICH GUY is Nicole talking about?” or, if there aren’t a vast number of guys, she should have the name(s) available for her right off the bat.

The question was not “ARE you texting any guys?”. The question was not “Are you talking to anyone besides Ronnie?”. Nicole asked her for specific information about a specific action. It’s the difference between someone asking you “Do you have money on you?” and “Which ATM did you get that $100 in your pocket from?”. The fact that someone is aware of how much money you have on you, *AND* that you went to an ATM to get it indicates that they’re referencing something specific, not taking a shot in the dark.

The answer to “Where did you get the money in your pocket?” is not “I don’t have money in my pocket”, when you know ******* damned well that you DO have money in your pocket, and exactly the amount you’re being asked about, which you retrieved from an ATM, to boot. The response is either a) “How do you know how much money I have?”, b) “How do you know I went to an ATM”, or c) I went to the ATM at Crenshaw & Slauson.

Similarly.. The response to “What’s the guy you’ve been texting?” is either a) “Who told you I was texting a guy?”, b) “How do you know I’ve been texting a guy?”, or c) a list of names of the guys you’ve been texting…. The answer “I don’t text ANYBODY!” clearly isn’t going to save your ass, because the way the question was formed indicates knowledge of your actions prior to approaching you.

So Sammi lies and says she hasn’t been texting any guys. She had already been busted on the reunion special for season 01 when they showed footage of her commiserating with Mike about this guy that she had been talking to behind Ronnie’s back. There was footage of her and Mike in her room and also driving together in the car, talking about her treachery, and for some odd reason, Snitchuation backed her play, violating “Guy Code” or “Dude Code” or “Bro Code” or whatever they call it, and completely siding with “Girl Code”, like Ronnie accused him of a full year later.

This was a problem as well. Nicole had stepped to Sammi so they could get their lies straight and do damage control. Sammi, thinking she’s smarter than she actually is….

Believing Your Own Hype

I have to go off on a tangent, here. :D If you’re an attractive female, and it seems like everybody agrees with what you say, they don’t. It’s easier to get laid if you agree with what hawt chicks say, is why nobody argues with you. Also, your opinions don’t have any bearing on anything important, so there’s no reason to jar you from your illusions and delusions.

Please don’t let this go to your head, where you think you’re actually SMARTER than the people surrounding you. When people know you’re wrong, they STFU so they can remain in your good graces and get the benefits. Girls benefit from the trickle-down guys they get to rap to that you reject. Guys get to benefit because they get to screw you.

Do yourself a favor, and figure out your relative intelligence before you attempt to run scams or lie about texting guys behind your recently-broken-up-with boyfriend’s back.

So.. Sammi, thinking she’s smarter than she actually is, doesn’t take advantage of this golden opportunity that Nicole gave her. Since she’s used to saying something and believing that people accept her word as bond, her brain elects to override the facts with belligerence. Her brain decides that she’s going to shout everyone down and tell them how it is, like Travolta in “Get Shorty”.

Had she been mentally functioning within the realm of reality, as soon as Nicole & Deena told her that there is a guy, on the premises, with a smartphone, that has text messages from her, with her face on them, inviting him to this very club to come see her, she would have sent Deena on the sneaks to try to tell the dude to play it off and not tell Ronnie what’s going on.

She couldn’t have gone, herself, because Ronnie would have followed her. She couldn’t have sent Nicole, because Ronnie would have watched where she went and come over to interrogate Sammi.

None of this matters, because Sammi’s response was to go on the warpath.

Nicole tells her “You texted him to come here tonight” and Sammi’s response is “No, I didn’t!”. Once again, wasted scheming time. Stop trying to dictate reality. You are not Nostradamus. You are not a Jedi. You’re not fooling anyone but yourself… *NOW*, Not only did Nicole tell you the name of the dude, and that he’s here in the club right now, and that he already told the fellaz that you told him to come see you here, but she’s telling you WHAT. YOU. SAID. IN. YOUR. MESSAGES. that he has with him, on his phone, right now, and that he’s already shown to Mike, Jenni, Deena and herself, and you’re STILL DENYING THAT YOU TEXTED HIM???

This chick is really dense. I think she would still have tried to deny if Chris Hanson had offered for her to sit down and have some lemonade.

Lesser Included Charges

Next, Sammi does the worst thing she could have done, and without making a plan with her girls about how she’s going to get over, she goes back over to where Ronnie is.

This is where I have to give Mike Snitchuation ultimate credit for his plotting. It worked out perfectly. Sammi still would have been busted if Mike had gone directly to Ronnie, because the evidence was in dude’s phone, but the fact that Mike enlisted ALL OF THE GIRLS ahead of time made Sammi look like a complete AssHat while they collectively explained the situation to Ronnie.

Sammi played “I’m so confused.. What are you talking about? :O” while Jenni and Nicole explained to her in front of Ronnie that the dude is here, he said Sammi invited her to come see him and he has the text messages still on his phone, to prove it, including her ******* picture on the texts.

So then, Sammi changes her story, ENTIRELY, right before Ronnie’s eyes.

All of a sudden, it’s not “I don’t text anybody” and “No I didn’t”, but rather “I will go ******* confront that guy, Arvin, and Mike, together, because let me tell you something… Arvin’s my friend from home!”

I’ve seen this a million times. Of course, guys do this too, but I’ve seen chicks change their excuse on the fly, when reality finally sets in that they’re not going to win.

You can’t change your excuse from “I didn’t have sex with him” to “I had sex with him because I was drunk” to “I made a mistake” to “I don’t remember having sex with him”… Which one is it? o_O

Unfortunately for you, excuses don’t cascade like Lesser Included Charges. If someone’s accused of Murder 1, they might actually be convicted of Murder 2 or Manslaughter, which is the exact same charge with lower levels of culpability / premeditation, so they carry lower sentences. Excuses don’t work like that. “He’s my friend from home” doesn’t fit inside “I didn’t text him”. “I texted him because we’re friends” doesn’t fit inside “I don’t text anybody”. Either you were lying at first, or you’re lying now.

What “Friends” Means

Also, just last month, I talked about what women MEAN in these situations when they say a guy is their “friend”. They don’t mean they like each other and pal around. They’re indicating that they don’t have sex with this particular male of the species.

For some reason that’s completely beyond me, women think that calling a guy their friend actually deflects suspicion. I just don’t get it. I mean.. When was the last time that a chick actually ADMITTED that she’s givin’ it up? o_O .. Like, to someone that’s not her boyfriend or husband?

Never, that’s when.

Any. Guy. That. A. Chick. Doesn’t. Want. To. Admit. She’s. Hooking. Up. With. Will. Be. Called. Her. Friend.

Get a clue, ladies. Everybody knows what time it is. I know you have to play it off, but don’t do yourself the disservice of believing that anybody believes you when you say it.

*PRO TIP* – Real Friends have something in common. That’s why they’re friends. People aren’t friends for no reason. This is why calling a guy your “friend” doesn’t fly. Just because you have a nice ass and he happens to like nice asses, that’s something you share in common, but it’s not something that makes you friends.

If you insist on using this as a cover, make sure you add the functionality of your so-called friendship in the explanation. “We work in the same industry”. “We both enjoy flying kites”. “We’re both studying Italian in the same class”. “We both have stamp and/or butterfly collections”. Make up SOMETHING that possibly explains why in the hell he would elect to be “friends” with you instead of boning you.

*PRO TIP #2* – If you’re going to go the “He’s my friend” route, make sure you select a guy that actually makes friends with girls for reasons other than eventually or immediately having sex with them.

DO NOT select a guy that’s a Hunter and expect anybody to believe he’s not doing his damnedest to screw you.

DO NOT select a guy that’s homeboys with your male roommate, who knows damned well that this dude doesn’t give a **** about you other than trying to hook up with you.

DO NOT invite your so-called “friend” to meet you at a club. Do not invite him to meet you at a club where your boyfriend will be in attendance. If you have to say something in public, play it off like you want to meet him for coffee (when everybody that knows him knows damned well that he NEVER drinks coffee and only drinks beer). Make some kind of platonic-looking excuse to spend time with him so that when you finally get busted, you can be like “So what? I had coffee with my friend. Big deal!”.

So.. Basically… As soon as Sammi changed her story from “I didn’t text anybody” to “I texted this Hunter and told him I wanted to see him and to meet me at a nightclub because he’s someone I know platonically from home that I don’t hook up with”, Ronnie knew what time it was.

Edited Conversations

I really don’t know what Sammi hoped to accomplish by confronting the two guys who were in control of the physical evidence of her actions. It was too late. The cat was out of the bag. Jenni, Nicole, and Deena had already seen her face next to the BBM text messages on the dude’s phone.

What was she going to do? Tell him to erase them? :D People had already seen them. She had already changed her excuse. She wasn’t denying that she sent him the messages, she was saying that it was OK that she sent him the messages because they share a platonic relationship together, based on………… o_O

So Sammi brings Ronnie over and steps to the dude. MTV proceeds to do a very creative edit that doesn’t make any sense at all. They make the conversation go:

Sammi: “You’re my friend”
Dude: “Yeah”
Sammi: “That’s It?”
Dude: “So?”

Then, they do a conspicuous cutaway to Ronnie standing there doing nothing so they don’t have to play the rest of the dialogue in the conversation, and next second, Ronnie’s walking away, upset, going “It’s fine. I’m going to the bathroom. I gotta go to the bathroom”.

This doesn’t make any sense at all, but it was the best edit the MTV producers could come up with based on whatever raw footage they had.

I’ve never had this happen to me, because chicks aren’t stupid enough to think I’m going to back their play if they bring their boyfriends to me, asking questions about my personal business. We can extrapolate what actually happened from the facts that we have:

1. Dude is AT THE CLUB BECAUSE Ronnie’s girlfriend (ex at the time) texted him, told him she wanted to see him and invited him to that specific club to spend time with her.
2. Ronnie was at home crying over Sammi and sending her flowers while she was texting with this dude.
3. Dude has the physical evidence ON HIM, in his phone, and everybody’s seen it already.
4. Sammi initially denied sending the texts, then admitted sending the texts while explaining that this guy is a platonic friend of hers.
5. Sammi claimed she was going to confront Mike and the dude, implying that she was going to get them to recant their story.
6. With Ronnie standing right there, she asked the dude if he was her friend.
7. Dude replied “Yes”.
8. Sammi asked “That’s it?”, requesting confirmation from him that they’re not messing around.
9. Dude replied “So?” instead of “No. We’re not messing with each other”.
10. More conversation occurred that MTV deleted.
11. Ronnie is upset and claims he has to go to the bathroom so he can escape the embarrassment.

Now.. If dude had said, in the part that MTV deleted “Listen, man.. I’m not kickin’ it with your girl. We’re “just friends” and she wanted to meet me here and have a drink and talk about her relationship to you, so I got dressed up, got a fresh haircut and drove my ass all the way here to this club, paid to get in and then paid for outrageously-priced drinks while I was waiting for Sammi to arrive for our platonic conversation about you that we can’t even have because it’s too ******* loud in here, so I probably would have had to take her to my SUV with the tinted windows and talked to her in the back…” Ronnie would have been ok with that.

That’s obviously not what happened.

Possibilities

One possibility is that Sammi and Ronnie stepped up, dude produced his phone, showed it to Ronnie and said “Here’s what your girlfriend sent me”, and let the facts speak for themselves.

Another possibility is that he didn’t deny messing with her.

This is what I mean about women trying to hide behind the term “friends”. Sammi asked him if he was her friend, and he said “yes”. That means that he likes her as a person. It doesn’t mean he’s never ****** her. Also, I’m sure Ronnie’s been in lots of situations where a chick he was screwing told people that he was her friend. Whether they believed it or not doesn’t change the facts of their relationship and sexual involvement.

This is why I’m suspicious of the word “So?” being the end of the conversation. It can’t be. She would have had to counter that with “You and I have never had sex, right?”, and then the entire situation goes downhill.

The problem here is that Sammi’s asking the dude to say “Yes, I’m a Herb. I hang out with girls for no reason at all. I don’t like to screw attractive chicks.”.. The second problem is that even if dude decided to lie about that for her benefit, he’s actually friends with Mike and has probably hung out with Ronnie before as well. That means they’ve all hunted together. That means Ronnie already knows damned well that this dude wouldn’t come to see Sammi for some bullshit platonic reason.

Another possibility is that dude showed Ronnie the text messages and said “No disrespect to you, dude. She told me y’all broke up. She invited ME to come spend time with her. I wasn’t trying to cut your throat. She never told me y’all got back together.”

He wasn’t obliged to say all that, because whatever he’s doing with Sammi is his own personal business and none of Ronnie’s business. If he’s friends with Ronnie, a very basic “Your ex girlfriend threw sex at me” is easily understandable and there should be no hard feelings in either direction. There was no reason for Ronnie to be disrespectful towards him for coming to a club to meet a newly-single female he wants to ****, and there was no reason for him to be disrespectful towards Ronnie for asking him about his personal business with Sammi.

Another possibility is that he told Ronnie “Yo. Mind your business.”

I doubt that’s what happened, because he had already told Mike, who told everybody else, so Ronnie was going to find out one way or the other. On top of that, dude is an actual friend of Mike’s, so there’s no reason for them not to clear the air so there aren’t any misunderstandings.

Another possibility is that he played the platonic friend role, but wasn’t convincing.

I doubt that’s what happened, because Mike and Ronnie know who he is and that he does the same thing they do when it comes to chicks.

Again, I’ve never been in this situation, so I can’t really say what I would have done.

What I *WOULDN’T* have done is ask Mike where Sammi is instead of just texting her ass and telling her to meet me by the bar. Either that, or physically going to find her, in which case, I would have seen Ronnie shadowing her and I would have known they were back in action.

Most likely, purely hypothetically, my reaction to Sammi and Ronnie coming to ask me about my personal business would depend on the level of friendship I had with Sammi. If she and I were TIGHT, I’d fall on my sword and go the “I’m a Herb” route, because I’m gonna do whatever I want with her ANYWAY, regardless of what her man thinks of me. If it makes her life better for her boyfriend or whatever to believe I’m a chump that hangs out with his girlfriend playing scrabble, that works for me.

If we weren’t cool like that, I would have shown Ronnie the text messages with his girlfriend’s face on it, let him read the evidence for himself, and said “If y’all are back together, cool. She said she was single now and wanted to spend time with me, so here I am.”

The other problem with the footage is that the dude looked completely calm in every single frame. There’s no “My bad, dude.” in his demeanor. He doesn’t look as if he just took one for the team and claimed he’s never messed with Sammi. He looks like “Whatever, dude.”, which is totally not the response Sammi was hoping to receive by “confronting” him and Mike.

The confrontation was supposed to yield a reversal from both guys. It clearly didn’t.

Whatever was said, Ronnie was rather upset, and broke up with Sammi, *AGAIN*! :D hahaha

Somehow, they end up in the kitchen, when Ronnie had claimed he had to go to the bathroom, and Ronnie proceeds to throw a min-fit: “Have fun with the girls.. I didn’t ******* call NO GIRLS while you were gone… I had every chance, on Thursday, to bring the ******* HOTTEST girl in the club home, and I ******* DIDN’T, because I was CRYING LIKE A LITTLE BITCH over ******* YOU!”

As much as I detest commenting on their juvenile, elementaryschoolesque relationship, I feel I should say that “If I had known you were sending text messages to another guy, I would have ****** this girl I met the other day” isn’t a good look.

You Betta Recognize!!!

The next thing that happens is that Sammi starts breakin’ on Mike, telling him she doesn’t want to have anything to do with him. Snitchuation’s response is basically “Don’t get mad at ME because YOU got busted! :D”.

In fact, Sammi has nothing to be mad at Mike for, because even though he was snitching and gossiping as usual, this time it worked out in the favor of the guys instead of the girls. Under “Guy Code”, Mike was obliged to inform Ronnie that his girl has been throwing it at his friend. Sammi has already benefiited from “Girl Code”, because if not for that, “The Letter” would never have been written, and she wouldn’t have been invited to sleep in the girls’ room after Ronnie destroyed all her stuff.

Typically, even though it may have been left out in the edit, there has been ZERO heartfelt apology from Sammi. She denied all the way to the end of the episode that she was messing with that dude. She kept saying “He’s. My. FRIEND!!!”, to which Vinny eventually casually replied “Girls don’t have friends that are guys.”

The bottom line, ladies, is that if you’re gonna mess with a shark, give him the respect of remembering that he’s a ******* SHARK! >:D .. He doesn’t believe anything you say. He lets it slide because it doesn’t matter, and it’s easier to have sex with you if you think he believes you’re right.

You can’t get away with the same excuses that work on Herbs because Hunters live in the real world and have been on both sides of the equation. They’ve been the guy lied to and they’ve been the guy that the gal lied to her boyfriend or husband about. They’ve told the lies to get the girl to give it up and they’ve told the lies that help their close homegirls maintain their relationships. They’ve looked dudes square in the eye and told them “Nah, I’m not ******* your woman” when they just got up off of her an hour ago.

Do yourselves a favor, ladies… Give a shark respect for who he is, and he’ll give you respect for recognizing game and coming correct.

Even though Ronnie sold out in the beginning of season 01, I said from the first time I saw the show that he should have been the top dog and squad leader over Pauly, Mike & Vinny when it comes to pulling chicks… Just because he’s been crying every episode and exhibiting Herb-like behavior doesn’t mean he’s not a shark at heart.

If your man’s an accountant or something, go ahead and tell him that you were texting another shark to meet you at a nightclub for platonic reasons. He’ll buy it. He’s not even going to be able to IMAGINE the kinky ways his girlfriend or wife gives it up when she’s with guys that actually turn her on and know how to put her body to work.

If you decide to date a badboy, understand that if you introduce him to another badboy as your so-called friend, they’re going to be able to detect each other, which most likely isn’t going to work out in your favor.

Mistaken Identity

I recently had a weird situation occur, along these same lines, but for the exact opposite reason.

I ran into this chick that I know but that I’ve never messed with. She could definitely get it, because she’s FOYINE, but I’ve never hooked up with her, dated her, nothing. She and I would actually qualify as “friends” in the platonic sense, not because I wouldn’t hit it, but because I haven’t yet.

I hadn’t seen her in well over a year, maybe even close to two. I greeted her, gave her a hug and a kiss on the cheek and asked her how everything was going. She replied “eeh. :/” and seemed to be looking past me, over my left shoulder as she was walking away.

I found her statement and response odd, but didn’t think anything of it, because I hadn’t seen her in so long that who knows what the hell had happened in her life during that time. \o/

So later, there was a baby crawling around, maybe a year old, and this baby crawls over to me and is really friendly, haha, most likely because we’re approximately the same color and have the same texture of hair.

In fact, I had never seen that kid before in my entire life. Being the friendly person that I am, I smiled and waved at the baby and he smiled and waved back.

20-30 minutes passed, and a mutual friend of mine and that chick’s was talking to some dude I’ve never seen before in life and decided to introduce us. I walked over and shook his hand, but he seemed really stiff.. tight.. as if he had some kind of problem with me that I wasn’t aware of.

Shortly after that, I had another run-in with the baby, except this time, the girl I hadn’t seen in ages was interacting with him in a way that indicated to me that she was most likely his mother.

This put all the pieces together for me :D

The guy was stiff because he’s her boyfriend, and purportedly the baby’s father.

Meanwhile, a guy he’s never seen before shows up, knows his girlfriend, her kid looks like me and is very comfortable around me…. hahaha Like they say on The Maury Show, I am ONE THOUSAND PERCENT POSITIVE I am not the father, because I’ve literally never had sex with her ever in life.

If he had asked me, I would have said “Nope. I’ve never dated or messed with your woman.”.. Not because it’s any business of his, because if he’s worried about whether he’s the pops or not, he needs to spend the money on a paternity test, but rather because I’m actually *NOT* messing with her, and The Ki-Hid Is Not My Son! >:D

–
Connect with Bill via Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, Email Subscription, RSS Feed

Related Posts

• Platonic Relationships
• Girls Don’t Have Friends That Are Guys
• Enabling Cheating In Relationships (Enough Is Enough)
• 10 Reasons He Wants To Be “Just Friends”
• “Busted” Haiku

We’ve all been in the situation where we’ve had to cover for our boy so he doesn’t get caught by his girlfriend/fiancee/wife cheating. Well.. If not “HAD TO”, we’ve all had it REQUESTED of us, and “the right thing to do” is hook your boy up and take one for the team.

Larry David’s had to do this several times by now for his homeboy/manager Jeff in his show “Curb Your Enthusiasm”, and after what I watched last night, I had to write about this stuff hahaha. Sorry cheaters… There comes a point where ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and you’re gonna have to get cut loose to sink or swim on your own.

I first became aware of this problem a long time ago. I searched for the episode reference, but couldn’t find it. I believe it was in season 01, and now, they’re in season 07. Anyway… Oh man, I was rollin’ off of this one! :D

Larry and his boy live in California. They travel 3,000 miles away, to New York City and while they’re there, Larry’s boy Jeff hooks up with some chick. At the time, Jeff was married and so was Larry, so, realistically, Jeff shouldn’t have asked Larry to cover for him at all, being that they would have been taking similar risks getting caught hanging out with some chick that wasn’t their wives.

The Problem

So Jeff’s finished doin’ the do, and he asks his boy Larry for a favor, namely to make sure the chick Jeff just hooked up with gets wherever she needs to go safely (You don’t gotsta go home……. but you GOTSTA GET *THE* *HELL* OUT OF *HERE*!!! :D). Larry naively accepts this assignment and decides he’s going to walk this girl across Central Park to wherever she has to go. As soon as I saw this, I was like “Oh Boy… HERE. WE. GO!!!”.

There are several problems with this scenario. First of all, if his boy tapped it, it’s HIS BOY’S problem to export the chick. Second, being that Larry was married at the time, he couldn’t afford the appearance of impropriety any more than Jeff could. I’m especially sensitive to this scenario because since I’ve been single during 85%-90% of my dating career, I’ve been the de facto “play it off” guy. I can absorb the hit from my friends’ girlfriends because I have nothing to lose. There’s nobody you can rat me out to. Except for the few times that I’ve declared myself “in a relationship”, I’m never under exclusive contract to any chick.

This means that when a guy’s girl unexpectedly shows up at the club, she might find me hugged up with the girl her man’s been kickin’ it to and plans to hook up with later that night. The girlfriend can’t say or do **** about it because she knows I’m single and liable to be hugged up with ANY chick at ANY time, including her little sister or her moms if her moms still has it like that ;)

This means that I might deliberately stay off the grid for a certain set of hours during a day so that my boy can say he was hanging out with me while he was actually kickin’ it with some chick that’s not his girlfriend. It’s important that I receive this communication ahead of time so I don’t accidentally walk down the avenue and run into dude’s girlfriend during the time that I’m supposedly bowling with him or whatever lie he told her.

So as soon as Larry accepted this assignment, I was like “He’s about to be ass-out!”. So, Of Course… Larry’s walking across Central Park with some chick that could probably be his daughter (not that The Kid‘s complaining about THAT! haha) and 3,000 miles away from home, he HAS to come across his wife’s girlfriend who just so happened to be jogging right then and right there.

Now, Larry has a big problem. He can’t explain this at-most-college-student away as a business contact. He also can’t tell the truth, which is that he’s walking a girl home that his boy just screwed behind his boy’s wife’s back. He also can’t take the hit and say “Yeah, she’s with me. What about it?” because he’s married AND this chick he ran into knows his wife. So now, Larry didn’t even GET ANY and he looks like he cheated.

Consequences & Repercussions

Of course, I was LMAO at this and rewound it over and over to watch him get caught by this chick! HAHAHAHA Oh man! :D IIRC, he went home and of course, his wife got a call from her homegirl before he got there and he was under pressure so he fessed up. I think he told his wife that Jeff had been cheating in order to save his own ass. This is part of the problem with trying to be a wingman. Dudes don’t think it out. Dudes don’t assess how much risk they’re taking on in order to help out a homeboy that SHOULD be helping HIMSELF and leaving you out of the mix entirely.

Jeff should not have asked Larry to export his girlfriend because he knew that Larry could have gotten in as much trouble as he could have if he got caught. Larry should not have accepted, because he knew that IF he got caught, he was going to spill the beans to his wife, which is actually MUCH WORSE than Jeff’s wife becoming suspicious. If Jeff’s wife thinks Jeff cheated on her, she still doesn’t have any evidence. If Larry’s wife tells Jeff’s wife that Larry told her that he knows first-hand that Jeff cheated on his wife, it’s a wrap.

What Larry SHOULD have done in that situation is tell Jeff to “Give that chick cab money and say SHALOM!” (or “Peace In The Middle East!” or “Don’t let the door HIT’CHA where the Good Lord SPLIT’CHA!”). There are too many options in NYC for exporting chicks without anyone seeing you together for Larry to have gone out like a sucker, which he did.

Same As It Ever Was

So that might have been six years ago…. Yesterday, I’m watching this episode, and now, in season 07, Jeff is still married and Larry is single so that makes it better as far as Larry taking the hit. So Jeff’s wife needs to blow her nose, so she looks in Jeff’s glove compartment and finds women’s panties. Obviously, Jeff tapped some chick in his ride and somehow, her panties ended up in the glove compartment. As a video editor as well as a dude that knows what panties look like AFTER they come off of a chick, I have to mention that the state of the panties was RIDICULOUS when the wife pulled them out of the glove compartment. They looked like they just came off the rack or the bin @ Victoria’s Secret. And, YES, I’ve been to VS countless times and I’m fully aware that they have bins for the discount bras that chicks hawk over. Actually, even if those panties had come out of that bin, they STILL wouldn’t have looked as starched as the panties she retrieved from Jeff’s glove compartment haha.. Not to mention that in getting them off, they would have rolled up and they shouldn’t have been so obviously never-moist… Anyway…

So the point is that Jeff decides that the best explanation for these panties (which might also be the reason why they were in pristine condition as opposed to being rolled off of some chick’s thighs just before she collected head from Jeff) is that not only do they belong to LARRY, but they belong to him because Larry. Enjoys. Wearing. Women’s. Panties. :/

Now, this was retarded off the bat. This was just too much. What Jeff SHOULD have said was that Larry had a date and his car was in the shop so he asked to borrow Jeff’s and *LARRY* left some chick’s panties in Jeff’s glove compartment. That’s something that Larry would have been able to cop a plea to with zero repercussions because he’s single now. The way Jeff set it up, he was asking too much of Larry. Jeff’s wife has a tremendously big mouth AND she’s a gossip. If she actually believed that Larry liked to wear women’s panties, that was going to be all over their social scene in a hot minute. It’s not true, AND it’s a lie that could affect Larry’s dating life going forward, so it’s just too much.

There was more to the episode, but I’m not going to talk about it in case you want to watch it and LYAO yourself, haha (The recent “Officer Krupke” episode).

Noooooo Mah Brotha… You’ve Gotsta Buy YOUR OWN!

The lesson here is that while it’s your sworn duty to bail out your boys in case they accidentally get themselves into a mess that could threaten their current relationship, HELP only goes SO FAR.

Seriously.

Some people aren’t meant to cheat. They don’t know what they’re doing. They’re just not cut out for it. They would like to imagine themselves as playboys but they’re obviously not.

Your hooking them up regardless of whatever wacko schemes they heap upon you is only enabling them to remain lame-o cheaters and not have to pay any consequences whatsoever. You’re doing more to support their relationship than THEY are, and you’re getting nothing of value in return.

On top of that, as soon as you stop enabling them, their relationship will be over anyway because they’re going to get caught and you won’t be there to bail them out. What’s the point of that? If it’s gonna end, let it end NOW so you don’t have to be bothered with these bull**** requests. You’re not the one that pledged fidelity to the chick, your boy is. If he can’t hold up his own word, maybe he needs to learn to or not be in relationships at all.

Also, if he’s not looking out for YOU and YOUR best dating interests, why should you look out for HIM? Why should he put you in a position where you can get get caught by your wife with a chick you didn’t even have sex with? Why should he put you in a position where his gossip-ass-wife that doesn’t like you in the first place is going to tell all her friends that you like to wear women’s panties?

What he needs to do is get his game tight or give it up altogether and stick with what he already has. Put his wife in the gym. Get her to stop being crabby. Whatever he has to do to be satisfied with his current relationship, let him concentrate on THAT instead of constantly screwing up and expecting YOU to bail him out regardless of the consequences to your personal or professional life.

Let your boy know that YOU help those who help THEMSELVES. If he’s not going to put HIS best foot forward, then neither are YOU.

Beleedat!

~ Bill Cammack | @BillCammack

Related Posts

• How To Deny Allegations
• Ho Into A Housewife?
• Tiger Woods vs. Chris Brown
• Your Girlfriend Is A Ho
• You’re Still Not Me

My ex and I had a superbly, fantastically EXCELLENT relationship for approximately four years… She would lie to me, and I would catch her lying. :D

I’m sure that doesn’t sound excellent to *you*, but it was for me. The fact that she was constantly lying meant that she was constantly trying to get over on me. It meant that she was going ALL OUT to get her way in situations. I admire and respect that, and I’m the same way. I want to WIN. I like being around people that WANT TO WIN and are willing to do whatever they have to do to achieve their goals.

What’s good about liars?

The fantastic part about this is that I kept experiencing instances where I could collect data about how she acts, sounds and looks when she’s telling the truth and when she isn’t. Eventually, maybe one year into our relationship, well, let’s say the ‘romantic’ part of our relationship, since we’re still close, to this very day… I had learned her behaviors so well that I could tell by her breathing patterns how she felt about things. There was this little “catch” in her breathing that would occur when she stopped “being” and started “thinking”. It was like Keanu seeing the double-cat in The Matrix. I knew that whatever I was about to get was something she was crafting or making up as opposed to something that she was naturally giving me, from her heart & soul.

The reason this is important is that I knew more about her than she wanted me to know. This allowed me to make decisions from a solid foundation of believing her or NOT believing her, because I was reacting to what she was subconsciously giving me instead of what she was consciously trying to feed me.

How did this come up?

I thought about this because I saw a video the other day with a guy and a gal talking to each other. I had never seen the guy before in my life. The gal asked him a question, and his reply was “UHHHHHHHH”. Now, he had been talking to her regularly before that. He heard everything she had to say before that. All of a sudden, he needed to stall for time, and his face entirely changed as if he had just started calculating what he was going to say to her. I was like “This guy’s lying”. Right off the bat. He hadn’t lied YET, but it was on the way, because instead of genuinely responding, he paused and had to decide how he was going to play this situation out.

Come to find out a little later in the video that the reason he was suddenly crafting his responses was that he had FAILED to deliver what he had promised to bring her. HE KNEW IT, but he didn’t want to say so while the cameras were running. He was lying by omission. He was deliberately leaving pertinent information out in an attempt to get over.

So I’m looking at this like “Man.. This guy’s really transparent. He’s such a BAD LIAR! :D” and that’s what reminded me of my ex transparently lying to me in my face. SHE didn’t know that *I* knew damned well that she was completely lying, and that’s the way I LIKED IT, because since she thought she was getting over, she never changed her style of lying and I always felt confident about whether I should base anything on what she just said or not.

Barring an actually HONEST female, the best ones to date are the ones that think they’re smarter than you, except they’re NOT! :D

What do you believe?

Personally, in social situations, like, “kickin’ it” situations, I don’t believe ANYTHING a female has to say. Nothing. Not. One. Thing. It has nothing to do with her being female, but rather that people in general have agendas and will come after you for whatever they want to do with you. I’ve been historically lied to by females so much that I’m rollin’ with “Guilty Until Proven Innocent”. This is why it was so great that my ex tried so hard and so often to get over on me so that I could honestly judge when she was lying to me, but way more importantly… When she was telling the truth!

What happens in most situations is that people don’t receive this education about their SOs, and then THE BIG LIE comes down the pipe and catches them slippin’. Two outs in the ninth with bases loaded, and you just got caught looking at a fastball down the middle. You’re out. You Lose. Game over.

Test the brakes.

Being in a relationship with someone that you don’t KNOW is like driving a car FAST without testing whether the brakes work. In the dating game, people are trying to procure a situation they fantasized about. They MIGHT think about what YOU want after that.. Maybe. That means it’s up to YOU to figure out a way where you can determine when the other person’s lying to you so you don’t make any important decisions based on false or deliberately fabricated information.

Here’s an example that’s rather typical…. Guy meets girl. Guy kicks it with girl. Guy spends time alone with girl and it’s time to do that thing… Guy gets out condom. Girl says “You don’t need that… I’m on the pill.”

Lots of guys have gone out like suckers for this line. Unfortunately, her statement means NOTHING. AT. ALL. unless you can TRUST what she says. You can’t trust what she says unless you know her deeply and intimately as a person. You can’t know her like that if you haven’t had deep conversations with her, and especially not if you just saw her at the bar, thought she was FOYINE and picked her up because you felt like tappin’ that.

Unfortunately, guys feel like “hittin’ it raw” (sex without having to use a condom) is an achievement. It isn’t. It’s ESPECIALLY NOT an achievement when she offers the same thing to every guy she kicks it with. It’s actually potentially dangerous to your health, AND will land you on The Maury Show.

Thanks to “I’m on the pill”, a lot of dudes ended up funding 18 years of a kid’s life. Thanks to “I’m only kickin’ it with you”, a lot of dudes ended up in the free clinic.

Of course, that’s true for the ladies also.. Thanks to “I can’t have kids” (which is used surprisingly often by guys to get girls to *not* require condoms and apparently gets over a lot as well), a lot of gals ended up with kids. :/ Thanks to “I’m only kickin’ it with you”, a lot of women ended up in the free clinic… or worse….

Don’t try this at home.

Unfortunately.. This information’s only useful to you IF you can mentally, emotionally or empathically “Feel” your girlfriend. If you can’t, all you end up with is a bunch of situations where you find yourself going “Damn.. She lied about that.”.. “Damn.. She lied about THAT!”.. “Damn.. She lied about that TOO!”.. “Damn..”

If that’s the experience you’re having, then it’s NOT a good thing if your girl’s a liar, and you might want to think about trading her in for one that comes standard with the honesty feature. Either way, it’s better for you to talk to her as much as possible and get to know her ways of being and patterns before you get hornswoggled and end up with kids you didn’t ask for or looking like the dude on Monopoly, pulling your pockets inside-out to show how empty they are.

~ Bill | @BillCammack

Related Posts

• How To Starting Dating Again
• Facebook: Should You Add Someone You’re Dating?
• Dumped For Personality?
• That’s Your Man’s Problem
• Relationship Compressors vs Limiters

You got caught cheating.
Your girl does not trust you now.
Pass her over here! :D

Twitter: BillCammack
Facebook Fan Page: Bill Cammack
DatingGenius Category: billcammack.com/category/datinggenius
Subscribe to DG!: feeds.feedburner.com/BillCammackDatingGenius
 

Related Posts

• We’re Just Friends!!!
• Enabling Cheating In Relationships (Enough Is Enough)
• Your Girlfriend Is A Ho
• You’re Still Not Me
• How To Deny Allegations