Continued from “What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 01]“

Voluntary Deportation

The problem is that the USA already *HAS* a society of working peasants. They’re called Illegal Immigrants.

Being that this entire land mass was originally inhabited by so-called “Indians” (because Columbus was *NOT* in India when he got here) and what are now known as Mexicans, which is why Eskimos north of the USA and Mexicans south of the USA don’t look too different from each other, the native inhabitants tend to leak back into this country.

Since they’re broke (poor, destitute), yet have skills in landscaping, carpentry, whatever, company owners know that they can pay them sub-Minimum-Wage rates, right here in America.

What are they gonna do? o_O Tell the cops and get deported? :D

So, the same way “Job Creators” get money overseas from foreign people that they don’t have to pay “properly” for working, the same thing has already been done right here, for a long-ass time.

This is why you hear Republicans clamoring about deporting 11.5 million Mexicans (make no mistake, they’re not talking about Swedes and Japanese when they say Illegal Aliens). They need to clear these people out to make space for the new peasant class that they’re going to create by abolishing Minimum Wage.

Meanwhile, if you listen to them speak, they have no actual plan on how to deport 12 million people. Even Bill O’Reilly asked them to their faces what they were going to do and they stuttered and stammered when he asked them whether they were going to go door-to-door, rounding up Illegals… Bachmann said that when one of them commits a crime, the ICE agents should deport them. O’Reilly said “ok.. What about the people that don’t commit any crimes? o_O” and she had nothing to say for herself.

This is because they’re trying to sell a dream to poor people.

They’re trying to convince them that they actually intend to deport a bunch of non-Americans, so all those CHOICE JOBS like being a busboy or grape-picker for sub-minimum wage will be available so broke Americans can get off of Welfare and Unemployment.

People want to complain that Illegals are TAKING their jobs. That’s not true. Business owners are GIVING the jobs to whomever the lowest bidder is. Americans are currently disallowed to bid less than $7.25 to work for you, while illegals can work for you for $.25 an hour if they’re that desperate.

So, the actual solution isn’t deporting people, but getting business owners to AGREE not to hire Illegals to do anything for them.

According to Mitt Romney, this should set off a round of self-deportation:

YouTube Link => youtu.be/OpQgAzAJQ7I

Everybody knows it’s better to be broke in Mexico than it is to be broke in Los Angeles. :/

So, again.. You have to realize that Illegals aren’t coming here and Bogarting your jobs. People are finding it economically feasible to hire people that they don’t have to pay very much. If Minimum Wage gets eliminated, all kinds of $2/hour jobs will become available to you, which is way less than the bum makes that stands outside of McDonald’s and opens the door for you, begging you for some change on the way out.

If that dude bums a quarter off of four people in 10 minutes, he’s effectively making $6/hour… begging.

Serfs Up

This is one of the reasons why Welfare programs need to be cut down. You can’t get people to work for less money than they can get by doing nothing and receiving government handouts for free.

Personally, I liked that brief period of time where people had to sweep the floor or something in order to receive their Welfare benefits… SOMEBODY has to sweep the floor. :D

Unfortunately.. In order to take people off of welfare, you have to have JOBS for them to do. If you’ve shipped all the jobs overseas and you’re hiring Illegal Aliens to do all the sub-Minimum-Wage jobs that no American actually wants to do anyway, you’ve painted yourself into a corner.

So, the idea is that by decreasing social services, you’re going to be able to force people to join the workforce, even though there aren’t any jobs for them to work, and you want to clear out jobs for them to work by deporting Mexicans.

But Wait! :D There’s More! :D

I’ve been seeing television commercials recently about how some groups are also trying to slow down *LEGAL* IMMIGRATION!!! :D

YouTube Link => youtu.be/-Ls_u4Gt43Y

That has to be the dumbest idea in history.

Slowing down highly-skilled workers and entrepreneurs from LEGALLY becoming a part of the United States economy? :D

Just stupid.

So it appears that the “Jobs Plan” is merely to remove the competition. Remove the low-level workers from the Minimum Wage jobs, and disallow high-level workers from remaining in the USA and contributing to our economy instead of whatever country they came from.

So these particular *IDIOTS* would have liked to have deported Sergey Brin so he could go create GOOGLE in Russia! :D

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Brin

Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin (Russian: Сергей Михайлович Брин; born August 21, 1973) is a Russian-born American computer scientist and Internet entrepreneur who, with Larry Page, co-founded Google, one of the most profitable Internet companies.[4][5] As of 2011, his personal wealth is estimated to be $16.7 billion.[1]

So, without intelligent immigrants, we’re going to need Americans to get college educations, right? :D

YouTube Link => youtu.be/NkjbJOSwq3A

WRONG!!! :D hahaha This tomfoolery is going to be the demise of the current Republican party. By the time these dudes are finished saying really stupid things, the Republican brand will be tarnished to the degree where they’ll get crushed AGAIN in the 2012 general election the way they did in 2008, or worse.

Alternate Philosophy

Perhaps the reason that Republicans seem to have no jobs plan whatsoever is that they appear to have a different philosophy from the Democrats about how jobs are created.

You’ll often hear them say that government doesn’t create jobs, the private sector does.

I wouldn’t know either way, because I’m not a “Job Creator”, but if that’s what they believe, then it would make sense that none of the roads they’re describing leads to anyone getting a job.

Instead, their goal may be to create the circumstances under which in their opinion the market will attain the certainty it needs to cause American business owners to start hiring people… Like, there IS no plan to create jobs because you CAN’T create jobs.. All you can do is enrich and enable the ENVIRONMENT in which jobs are created.

If this is the case, they’re going about it all wrong. They counter a plan by President Obama with “No, we don’t like that”, but they never have an alternative plan.

It would be better if they made their points clear by saying something like “That plan would not stimulate the economy by enabling the private sector to blah blah blah”.

Also, they don’t look intelligent when they counter proposals to put teachers, construction workers and war veterans to work with no plan to put anybody to work.

In fact, the only plan I’ve heard of, which they talk about every single day for some odd reason, is this pipeline they want to build.

According to the Republicans, building the pipeline from Canada will create 20,000 American jobs (other reports have the number as low as 3,000 jobs), *AND* help the USA become energy-independent.. Two things that appear to be in everyone’s best interests.

The problem is that Nebraska is concerned that a spill would contaminate their drinking water => businessweek.com/news/2012-02-27/transcanada-to-build-texas-segment-of-keystone-xl-pipeline.html, so 3,000 or 20,000 jobs might not be worth a bunch of people getting poisoned, right? :D

Get On-Message

Here are some links where you can go read what the candidates have to say for themselves:

1. mittromney.com/jobs

2. ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

The problem is that when people are running for PotUS, you shouldn’t have to go find what they’re saying somewhere. You should KNOW what they’re saying. More importantly, you should BELIEVE what they’re saying.

Right now, I should be able to say “Romney’s plan is better for America than Santorum’s plan because XYZ” or “Paul’s plan is better than Gingrich’s plan because XYZ”. I can’t do that. Not because I haven’t been watching and listening, but because all they want to talk about is Gingrich cheating on his wiveS and Santorum being a fanatic and Paul’s foreign policy being potentially disastrous for the USA and Romney being out of touch with commoners.

They’re so busy tearing down each other’s reputations that they’re not telling the public ANYTHING that would convince them to vote for one candidate over the other, much less to vote for them instead of President Obama.

The ultimate winner of the Republican nomination will *NOT* be the guy with the best plan, but rather the one who’s most successful at reducing the favorability ratings of his competition.

Obviously, reducing favorability during the nomination process STICKS during the general election, so Obama will be facing a majorly diminished opponent by the time they figure out who that’s going to be.

Of course, Republicans like to spin this and say that the more this drags out, the more they get issues out of the way so Obama can’t use it against them in the general. Unfortunately, this is the YouTube age, and all that material that Gingrich and Romney’s Super PACs posted about them will be available to the Reelect Obama team, so all they really have to do is cut and paste what the Republicans ACTUALLY SAID to make effective campaign ads.

Speaking of Super PACs, they really ruined the process for the Republicans. Without them, Romney wouldn’t have been able to trash Gingrich’s reputation with millions of dollars’ worth of attack ad commercials playing incessantly on television, and Gingrich and Santorum would no longer be in the race without their respective Sugar Daddies that are paying millions of dollars for their boys to stay in the race.

By now, the race would have been down to Romney and Paul, so the R’s would have already rallied around Romney as their candidate, and he could a) speak EXCLUSIVELY about the differences between himself and President Obama, and b) stop digging a deeper hole for himself by trying to match lunacy with Santorum, trying to prove that he’s a Conservative (which he isn’t) by spouting all these outdated and fanatic ideas that are currently on the wrong side of history.

Romney would have been able to focus on the economy and jobs and his experience as a businessman in the private sector, and attempt to make the general election what Republicans claim it’s going to be, which is a referendum on Obama’s achievements during his Presidency.

In fact, it will *NOT* be a referendum on Obama. It will simply be “Would you rather have Obama or THIS LUNATIC in control of the United States of America?”

Santorum is betting that there are enough people that see his statements as “right and good” to counter the number of people that have now deemed him more dangerous than Sarah Palin (which is a major accomplishment, and one that I didn’t believe could be achieved).

The Republicans are energizing the Democrat’s base FOR THEM. They’re giving the people that might have otherwise stayed home and not bothered to vote for Obama in 2012 some very good reasons to make their voices heard and presences felt, if not as a vote FOR Obama, then strictly as a vote *AGAINST* Santorum or Romney.

So, Like I said in Part 01.. “Assuming a Brokered Convention, in which case, there would be a Republican running that I might actually vote for… In order for me to vote for that person, it would require that a) they could prove to me that President Obama’s plan is *BAD*, and b) they could convince me that their jobs plan is *BETTER*.”

This would require the Republicans to get ON-MESSAGE and talk about things that are important to people without jobs.

If Gingrich has the best jobs plan for America, nobody cares how many wives he cheated on.

If Romney has the best jobs plan for America, nobody cares how rich he is or how he got that way.

Without clear information about who has the best ideas, this nomination *WILL* be decided on social issues and the perception of electability.

That means that even out of this weak final-4, the R’s won’t be sending their best man against Obama, which is a very bad idea.

I felt from the beginning that Romney was the only real candidate, and he’s the only one that has a chance of doing decently in the general election. That was before the candidates started speaking… By now, I think it’s even MORE IMPORTANT that the R’s rally behind Romney and end this nomination process as soon as possible.

If they send Santorum, spouting ridiculous conspiracy theories against Obama, it’ll be an automatic loss.

Who Cares? \o/

In a two-party political system, you end up with the best results when both parties “come correct”.

If both parties are making intelligent arguments and both seem to have plans that would be beneficial to their constituents, then both teams have to put their best foot forward, and/or make compromises they wouldn’t otherwise have made.

If one of the parties offers clearly incompetent candidates and/or people that will be summarily written off by the casual observer as fanatics, lunatics, zealots, or demagogues, regardless of how good their message is, the other side knows they’re going to win once the people really get to know the competition.

That’s like if a dude tries to steal one of your girlfriends and he’s a bum.. Who cares? :D Let him get as much light as he wants. She’s not going anywhere.

But if his presentation is proper and he seems like he might actually abscond with your chick, you might have to amend some of your policies and step your game up to make sure you stay in position. >:D

So the reason I’m interested in this (can’t really say that I “CARE”) is that I would like to see a competitive 2012 Presidential election.

The odds of that occurring get slimmer every time the Republican candidates talk about some nonsense and don’t focus on what they’re going to do to accelerate the country’s economic recovery, and what they’re going to do to put millions of Americans back to work.

So I would LOVE to hear something from Romney that makes me think he has a chance against Obama, but I haven’t heard that yet. He’s too busy faking being a Conservative and trying not to say things that make him sound rich, like he is.

I think if Santorum gets the nomination, every group that he’s so carefully disrespected over the last few months is going to motivate everyone they know (and everyone they don’t know) to vote against him so they don’t have to live through the world he describes in his speeches.

Ultimately, regardless of whomever the nominee is and regardless whom is elected President in 2012, the net result needs to be a *WIN* for the American people.

If the Republicans can provide that win, I want to know how.

If the Democrats can provide that win, I want to know how.

After four more months of this Republican tomfoolery and negative campaigning against themselves, it will be too late for messages about jobs or the economy. People will vote for Obama off of general principle, because they feel creeped out every time they consider the alternative.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 01]
• Republican Race To The Bottom
• Brokered Conventions
• The Current Republican Problem
• 2012 Iowa Caucus Results

Brokered Conventions, Yet Again…

I’m an Independent. I can vote for whomever I want.

In order for me to vote for…. ok, wait..

I can’t actually see myself voting for any of the current Republican candidates, so let me not even type that. :D

Let’s assume that what I told y’all about 2 1/2 months ago, back in December 2011 (which the pundits, late as usual, are talking about on every single television show now) happens, which is a “Brokered Convention” => http://billcammack.com/2011/12/11/brokered-conventions/

At this point, they’re also being called “Open Conventions” and “Contested Conventions”, but the song remains the same. If none of the Republicans secure the required 50% of delegates (1,144 out of 2,286) to clinch the nomination, none of them can claim to be the legitimate nominee at the Republican National Convention, which means that any of them, or, more importantly, NONE OF THEM might be nominated, and some totally different dude might be selected to run against Obama, such as Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie, Jed Bush, Paul Ryan, or Haley Barbour.

In my opinion, this so-called “Contested Convention” will be highly likely if Romney loses in his home state of Michigan, which we’ll know after tomorrow, Tuesday, February 28, 2012.

Romney’s main problem is his inauthenticity. His other problem is his religion, even though none of the pundits want to talk about it.. They just keep saying “He’s going to have problems winning in the South, and any state where 40% of the voters classify themselves as Evangelical Christians” and don’t bother to discuss it any more than that. Romney himself doesn’t want to discuss it, as he keeps saying “My Faith” and refuses to utter the word Mormon, so we’ll see how that works out for him.

Anyway.. The point is that so far, Romney has only been able to pull ~30% of the vote in any given situation. This means that if Gingrich drops out (which he won’t, because he’s still trying to get Romney back for dragging his name through the mud with attack ads that are still being watched on YouTube every day), that leaves the other ~70% for Santorum and Paul, and with Paul only pulling around 20%, that leaves a consistent 50% for Santorum to potentially snarf, which will be important once the contests change over from proportionally assigning delegates to winner-takes-all, after April 1, 2012:

conservapedia.com/Presidential_Election_2012

It is virtually impossible for a candidate to win a majority of delegates before June 2012.

About 1,144 delegates[2] are needed to win the nomination. Primaries held before April 1, 2012, will award delegates based on the proportionality of the votes (except Florida claimed to award winner-take-all, at half the delegate count, for its primary on Jan. 31). Beginning on April 1, the traditional winner-take-all system may be used by states, but the second biggest state, Texas (155 delegates), will be proportional, and the biggest state, California (172 delegates), will be winner-take-all by each of its 53 congressional districts.[3] Only seven primaries totalling a small number of delegates are winner-take-all; New York will only be winner take all if one candidate wins more than 50% of the vote.[4]

Today is February 27, 2012.. If this source is correct, this tomfoolery will continue until June, which is FOUR. MONTHS. FROM. NOW! :D haha By that time, all of their names will be mud before the Democrats even begin to tell their side of the story.

So I got sidetracked. :D Let me start again…

WHAT. IS. YOUR. #*$&#^#$. JOBS PLAN???

I’m an Independent. I can vote for whomever I want.

Assuming a Brokered Convention, in which case, there would be a Republican running that I might actually vote for… In order for me to vote for that person, it would require that a) they could prove to me that President Obama’s plan is *BAD*, and b) they could convince me that their jobs plan is *BETTER*.

It’s really that simple.

As you can tell if you’ve been following my blog, I’ve been writing about this Republican nomination process since September 08, 2011, which is more than 5 months, or approximately 150 days, and I have no idea whatsoever how anything that the current Republican candidates are saying translates into Americans receiving job opportunities, either in the near or the foreseeable future.

I’m not joking about that or being biased. I honestly don’t see it, and I’ve actually been *LOOKING* and *LISTENING*, so I’m sure that the millions of voters that haven’t been paying attention to this process don’t have a clue what the Republican Jobs Plan is either… Assuming they even know who’s running.

“News With A Twist Hits The Streets: Do You Recognize Republican Presidential Candidates?“

I get the basic points of what they’re saying.

It begins with the Convenient Cycle of Rights, where federal rights aren’t supposed to trump state’s rights, and state’s rights aren’t supposed to trump personal rights, but individuals should be restricted from doing things, NATIONALLY, based on the candidate’s opinion about something = federal rights trumping individual rights, so you can play Rock, Paper, Scissors all day.

Next is that America has enough natural resources to be Energy Independent, but Obama won’t let more oil rigs be constructed COUGHbpCOUGH, and he’s putting the environment ahead of humans, according to Santorum.. Except… *DUH*… Humans have to LIVE. IN. THE. ENVIRONMENT. so it isn’t cool to poison people’s water in Pennsylvania to get gas that’s going to be used in New York City.

Next is that federal government doesn’t create jobs. The private sector creates jobs, so the best way to get them to do that is to make sure the “Job Creators” have more money, so whatever you do, don’t raise taxes on rich people… Feel free, however, to NOT CONTINUE A TAX BREAK = RAISE TAXES for middle-class people, because they’re workers, and don’t create jobs for anybody, so who cares if they have money? \o/

Also, the argument is that the tax break for the middle class is actually being taken out of the Social Security fund, so it’s making a bad situation even worse.

Next is not to tax money being brought back to the United States by the “Job Creators” who created jobs anywhere else in the world, *EXCEPT* for in America, because it’s easier to get cheap labor in countries where you have a bunch of desperate people:

forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/08/17/why-amazon-cant-make-a-kindle-in-the-usa/

nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html?pagewanted=all

How the U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work

When Barack Obama joined Silicon Valley’s top luminaries for dinner in California last February, each guest was asked to come with a question for the president.

But as Steven P. Jobs of Apple spoke, President Obama interrupted with an inquiry of his own: what would it take to make iPhones in the United States?

Not long ago, Apple boasted that its products were made in America. Today, few are. Almost all of the 70 million iPhones, 30 million iPads and 59 million other products Apple sold last year were manufactured overseas.

Why can’t that work come home? Mr. Obama asked.

Mr. Jobs’s reply was unambiguous. “Those jobs aren’t coming back,” he said, according to another dinner guest.

The president’s question touched upon a central conviction at Apple. It isn’t just that workers are cheaper abroad. Rather, Apple’s executives believe the vast scale of overseas factories as well as the flexibility, diligence and industrial skills of foreign workers have so outpaced their American counterparts that “Made in the U.S.A.” is no longer a viable option for most Apple products.

So the response/answer to this is supposed to be to not tax “Job Creators” when they bring money back from their overseas businesses, because that’s supposed to give them incentive to create jobs in America… As opposed to creating MORE JOBS anywhere EXCEPT America, like they’ve been happily doing up until election time.

What’s supposed to pave the way for these jobs to return to America is either lowering Minimum Wage, or abolishing it, entirely.

For y’all non-Americans, this is what Minimum Wage is:

dol.gov/whd/minimumwage.htm

The federal minimum wage provisions are contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. Many states also have minimum wage laws. Some state laws provide greater employee protections; employers must comply with both.

Now.. I worked for minimum wage exactly once in my life, and that was a favor I was doing for my parents when I was a little kid, folding papers and putting them in envelopes for a local social organization.

At the time, my “income” was based on my weekly “allowance”, which, again, for y’all non-Americans, is money that you get for free from your parents every week, without your having to do anything at all.

I bring that up because I wasn’t working for minimum wage because I needed the money. I was basically wasting time, doing my parents a favor, and the money was incidental. I only did it one day a week, for probably 4 hours each time (maybe 3.. don’t remember), so, like Romney would say about his exorbitant speaker’s fees, the money I was making was negligible and unimportant. :D

I always knew I was never going to work for minimum wage, because “who does that? \o/”. If I wanted to work for minimum wage, I could have done that directly after elementary school… hmm.. I guess I could have done that after junior high school (8th grade), because I think you have to be 14 years old in the USA to get “working papers” which allow you to work for somebody, which I wouldn’t know, because I wasn’t even *THINKING* about working when I was 14 years old.

The point is that factories and jobs are moved to foreign countries because you don’t have to pay those people American minimum wages.

While I would never ever in life consider working for minimum wage, people in other countries line up BEGGING for sub-American-minimum-wage jobs. Companies can make themselves look more profitable, instantly, by hiring people that they don’t have to shell out a whopping $7.25 USD/hour for.

This is why they want to get rid of Minimum Wage. The idea is that if someone doesn’t have to pay $8 for one person to work, they can pay $4 each for two people to work, or $2 each for four people to work. This would bring unemployment down very quickly.

Of course.. It would also create a society of peasants.

Who cares? So long as they’re WORKING peasants, right? :D

Continued in “What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 02]“…
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 02]
• Republican Race To The Bottom
• Brokered Conventions
• The Current Republican Problem
• 2012 Iowa Caucus Results

This 2012 Republican nomination process has gone from amusing to funny to stupid to embarrassing to pathetic.

When I first started watching this fiasco unfold, I figured the end result would be exactly what Ann Coulter said:

YouTube Link => youtu.be/vo6SOpOE788

If we replace Chris Christie’s name in her statement with “a viable Republican candidate”, we arrive at my statement at the time.. If the Republicans didn’t get a viable candidate to run, they were going to nominate Romney and they were going to lose, barely, to President Obama.

When none of the preferred Republicans were willing to run for PotUS.. Chris Christie, Paul Ryan, Haley Barbour, Mitch Daniels.. I felt that the inevitable conclusion was that Romney was going to be nominated, because as I said then and as I still maintain now, he’s the only REAL candidate that’s been involved in the process, and the rest of the guys and gals were all filler content to make it look like the Republicans ever had a choice.

The rest of the candidates were supposed to look SO BAD when compared to Romney that he was supposed to come through this process looking like someone people might take a chance on as being the leader of this entire country = the leader of the entire world.

That’s not how things went, and at this point, like I said two months ago, back in December, 2011 http://billcammack.com/2011/12/11/brokered-conventions/ the pundits are *NOW* talking about Brokered Conventions every day.

The short version of my December article that I linked is that if none of the current candidates secures the requisite number of delegates by the end of the process, the Republicans aren’t obliged to run ANY. OF. THEM! o_O

So, all this tomfoolery between Gingrich, Romney, Paul, and Santorum might get thrown out the window so the Republicans can decide at their National Convention to run Jeb Bush instead.

How interesting would that be, if all these so-called “candidates” have been tossed to the mass media to be made incessant fun of because of their own stupid statements, and then NONE OF THEM end up advancing to the general election? :D

Numbers Game

If you look at the numbers elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates, there are approximately 2,286 available delegates.

To definitely receive the nomination and not get jerked at the Convention, one of the “candidates” has to secure 1,144 delegates.

Up until now, the delegates have been assigned proportionally, meaning that if you win a state with the most votes, that doesn’t mean that you get all the delegates. It’s something to the effect of there are voting districts that award you delegates if you win them and voting districts that award you NOTHING if you win them. The important thing for these candidates to do is win the most districts that actually contain delegates.

Let’s not count everyone’s current delegates, because there are only two candidates in this race.. Romney, and Not-Romney.

Currently, according to the chart, Romney has 105 delegates, and the rest of the candidates combined have 120. This means that Romney has less than 50% of the delegates that have been awarded so far.

1,144 delegates to win is approximately 50% of the 2,286 delegates available…

You see where this is going, right? :D

If the trend continues the way it has been so far, Romney will fail to secure the nomination before the Republican Convention, and then all bets are off.

I’m not saying that anyone else will have enough delegates to win, but that they *DEFINITELY* have the potential, at this point in time, to block Romney from being nominated.

This entire time, Romney has been polling around 30%, which, again, is less than 50%. Way less.

What he’s been counting on is that eventually, we get to the winner-takes-all states, and he’s going to squeak by with a bunch of 30% wins and end up with the delegates he needs.

When I first started writing about this stuff, I agreed with that assessment. Now, I’m not so sure that’s going to work out just the way he planned it.

YouTube Link => youtu.be/sLRwdbg1xME

The reason why the different also-rans have been said to be “surging” is that Romney’s support has remained consistent, while the rest of them come from nowhere to somewhere, passing Romney in polling until we find out that they were paying women’s rent that weren’t their wives, or that they have historically, serially cheated on their wives until dumping the wife for the chick they were cheating with, or they sound like COMPLETE IDIOTS when they speak freely in debates, or whatever else has knocked off the other “candidates” so far.

The problem for Romney right now is that as the “surgers” have disappeared and eventually exited the race entirely, virtually NONE of their support has gone to Romney.. It’s all gone to the next potential Not-Romney, which is why Republicans are praying, wishing, and begging for a Brokered Convention.

The reason that’s a problem for him is that 30% will never be greater than not-30%, which is 70%.

Now, we know Ron Paul isn’t exiting the process. He’s amassing delegates so he gets to speak at the Convention and talk about liberty. He can’t be discouraged from continuing, because his goal isn’t to win, but rather to have decision-making power when the national spotlight is on Republicans.

Gingrich, on the other hand, after being *SMASHED* by Romney’s Super PAC by millions of dollars’ worth of negative ads that flooded television stations and caused his polling numbers to nosedive, could possibly exit the race… The only reason he isn’t is so that he can jerk Romney for dragging his name through the mud and try to get him back by ruining his chances to win, and that’s exactly what’s happening.

Race To The Bottom

The problem with Gingrich staying in the race is that he’s a way better speaker than Romney. Every time Romney goes off-script, and I mean AN ACTUAL SCRIPT THAT HE NEEDS TO READ, he commits some kind of political gaffe, which is actually a lack of ability to prevent his actual views about life from spilling out of his mouth.

The longer Gingrich stays in the race, the more times Romney has to freestyle. The more Romney freestyles, the worse he looks. Meanwhile, Santorum has been sitting on the sidelines, not getting dirtied by either Romney or Gingrich, but that’s about to change dramatically. Ron Paul isn’t involved because everybody knows he’s not going to be nominated, so there’s no sense in wasting money making negative attack ads about him.

The effect of this race dragging on has gone in a different direction than I predicted.

I thought that compared to all these non-candidates, Romney would eventually emerge as the guy that all Republicans need to back if they want even the slightest chance of a victory vs. President Obama.

What actually happened, though, is that because Romney couldn’t get them all to quit, because they know that Not-Romney is a way more desirable candidate than Romney, and they want to be the last Not-Romney standing.. Instead of turning the corner and being able to talk trash about Obama, Romney is *STILL* in a position where he has to talk trash about Gingrich and Santorum.

The problem with that is that in order to talk trash about Gingrich and Santorum, you have to portray yourself as even more of a jerk than they are.

This is not going to play out in Romney’s favor in the general election.

My original prediction of Romney being the only one that can win the general election for the Republicans was based on the fact that he’s the only one that’s well known for flip-flopping on issues… just about *ALL* issues.

In fact, what Republicans currently refer to as ObamaCare was originally RomneyCare, from when he was Governor of Massachusetts:

washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-romneycare-obamacare-connection/2011/10/11/gIQAv0PdcL_blog.html

The folks who worked on the Massachusetts law didn’t exactly fade into the background once the health reform law passed and implementation got underway. Instead, many former Romney officials are now working for both the Obama administration and state governments to ensure that that the Affordable Care Act gets set up.

I figured this would help Romney in the general, because he would be able to tell people that he wasn’t that far off from Obama’s thinking, so they should elect him as a change from how the economy’s been going.

Unfortunately, he can’t play that card until he gets past Gingrich and Santorum… Until then, he has to pretend to be a Conservative.

Everybody knows Romney isn’t a Conservative (or, anything, really.. he just wants to be elected), so the longer he has to pretend to be one, the more inauthentic he looks, saying freestyle garbage like “I was a Severely Conservative Republican Governor”:

YouTube Link => youtu.be/DI8PlTtM7DU

What the hell is a SEVERELY Conservative person? :D haha Imagine you asked your homeboy how his date went, and he replies “I severely had sex with her! :D”, you *KNOW* that dude is LYING!!! :D HAHAHAHA

Almost-Obama

So, the net effect of this situation dragging on is *NOT* that Romney looks better, but that he looks worse… Daily… Some days, HOURLY! :D

Meanwhile, Ron Paul’s reputation has remained perfectly intact, even in light of the “I don’t know who wrote all those racist comments in the newsletterS with my name on them” situationS.

Gingrich’s name is mud with women, because his current wife is actually the mistress that he cheated on his mistress that he cheated on his first wife with en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich#Marriages_and_children, so women are constantly reminded of his ex wives that he dumped after announcing to them that he’s screwing some other chick now.

Guys, generally, don’t care about that. They’re like “Play on, Playah! ha-HAA :D Get In Where You FIT IN!!! >;D”.

Santorum is making himself more viable for the Republican nomination and less viable for the general election every day with his comments about women, contraception and a host of other ridiculous ideas of his that caused someone on television to say “Santorum has the finest mind of the 13th century”:

campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/09/the-first-principles-of-rick-santorum/

One dismissive reviewer of Santorum’s 2005 book, “It Takes a Family,” wrote in The Philadelphia Inquirer that Santorum is “one of the finest minds of the thirteenth century.” (An opponent once said the same of that other provocative Catholic conservative, William F. Buckley, Jr.) This is no insult: it is the heart of Santorum’s appeal to conservative evangelicals.

So, the only way for Romney to look good to Conservatives is to attempt to appear to be more of a jerk than Santorum. Romney isn’t even good at THAT! :D haha He’s just not convincing as someone who has principled objections to things. Everything he says seems to be learned off of 3×5 cards that his handlers trained him with.

In fact, it’s tough to pretend to have a position on something when that particular thing doesn’t matter to you at all… In Romney’s case, he’s rich, his father was rich, his sons are rich..

The Romney Kids’ $100 Million Trust Fund
money.cnn.com/2012/02/06/pf/romney_kids_trust/index.htm

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Mitt Romney’s five sons — Matt, Tagg, Craig, Ben and Josh — are sitting pretty with a trust fund worth $100 million.

There’s no reason that Romney should sound authentic in *anything* he says regarding middle class people, and ESPECIALLY not the American poor.

Similarly, I don’t sound authentic when I tell women I love them, because they’re trapped in the movie / fairy tale notion of what love is, and they know I’ve always had women, I have women now, I’m always GOING to have women, and the concept of only being physically attracted to one of them doesn’t register with me.. it isn’t my personal reality.

I *DO* love them if I tell them I do, but my detachment makes me appear inauthentic when I say it.

It also makes me appear inauthentic when I say it to more than one woman as we’re all standing together on a balcony at a party, but that’s neither here nor there. >:D

So.. Romney, who appears to believe in nothing, because he doesn’t have to believe in anything, because he’s rich already, and he’s never going to be not-rich, isn’t able to convince Conservatives that he loves them, so he has to keep making stupid statements to prove his fidelity.

Meanwhile.. Rick Santorum ACTUALLY. BELIEVES. WHAT. HE’S. SAYING!!! :D hahahaha oh man.. You can see that he actually believes it when he’s speaking.

This is why Conservatives are flocking to him.. Not because they think he can win, but because they’re not convinced that Romney would carry the Conservative flag (and neither am I) if he were nominated. They’d rather go down swinging, backing Santorum, than relegate themselves to the very choice that made me feel that Romney had a chance in the general, which is a decision between Obama and Almost-Obama.

Just Like I Told You

Meanwhile, we’ve seen an important shift occur.. A shift that I told people this entire time was going to happen.

President Obama’s favorability ratings were low a few months ago. They were so low that Republicans were telling me, and they really seemed to believe this, but then again, Jim Jones’ followers believed him too, that *ANYBODY* the Republicans ran would easily be able to defeat Obama in the 2012 election.

I told those people very simply, and directly to their faces “That’s because the people being polled don’t know what kind of candidates you’ve offered as an alternative.”

I told them that the more the American people understood about the Republican candidates, ESPECIALLY when Perry, Bachmann, and Cain were still involved, the better Obama’s going to look.

That’s exactly what’s happened, and what will continue to happen until Gingrich drops out. The Republicans are in a race to the bottom. The only selection to be made is which one of them is the least worst.

Meanwhile, Obama’s ratings have been steadily climbing. When the polls changed from “Obama vs. Any Republican” to “Obama vs. Romney” and “Obama vs. Santorum” and “Obama vs Gingrich” (since they refuse to give Ron Paul any light, whatsoever, in these polls), the numbers have been steadily rising for Obama and steadily declining for all three Republicans.

This is because they insist on ripping each other apart, like crabs in a barrel.

We never hear about why one of them is better than the other one. We only hear why one of them is worse than the other one, and they’re doing Obama’s campaigning job for him.

Another thing I told you four months ago, back in October billcammack.com/2011/10/28/scorched-earth-politics/ was that the Republicans needed to change their obstructionist tactics after Obama started telling the entire country what they were doing… As soon as The President started going from state to state, speaking to the actual people and on television, talking about “Pass This Bill” so that teachers and construction workers and Armed Forces veterans can get jobs, right now, and Republicans refused to do it, while simultaneously *NOT* offering an alternative plan to put those same people to work, they trapped themselves, and just like I said, every day since then, they’ve been taking a beating in the media for being AGAINST job creation for Americans.

Now.. Not only does everybody know that they’re doing anything they can to deny President Obama a second term,

YouTube Link => youtu.be/2gM-1HbK4qU

but the economy is getting better, *DESPITE* their objections and interference.

Instead of being able to take credit for the (albeit, slow) American economic recovery by claiming bipartisan cooperation, they currently look like a bunch of people that have tried and failed to make the current President look bad, while simultaneously failing to get any of their desired party members to run for PotUS and instead offering us this clown show that has many people believing the Republicans are deliberately throwing the race, because they can make more money bitching and moaning about Democrats for another four years than they would if they were actually in office.

Do You Know Any Women?

So the newest trend amongst Republicans is to attempt to get back on the wrong side of history with women’s reproductive rights. :D

I think the creepiest part of everything I’ve watched over the last several months is that these people either HAVE NO CLUE or DON’T GIVE A DAMN about the people that they flippantly disrespect.

They really seem to have forgotten that women can vote now.

They can also hold jobs, own property, ask men out on dates…

Here’s a tip for y’all.. There’s what women SAY, and what women DO.

This is why a lot of women (though I refuse to believe statistics that say things like 98% of any group does anything www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-claim-that-98-percent-of-catholic-women-use-contraception-a-media-foul/2012/02/16/gIQAkPeqIR_blog.html) use contraception and then TELL YOU THEY DON’T.

This is why, as pathetic as your candidates already are, you’re alienating Independents, which you’re going to *NEED* in the general election.

You’re also alienating Republican Women who don’t feel like returning to the dark ages.

So.. As Usual.. As has been the pattern throughout these proceedings, you’re pandering to the people that are already going to vote for you, while simultaneously alienating the people who were on the fence and MIGHT have voted for you.

The only hope the Republicans have at this point is a quick and decisive win by one of the final four that leads to the rest of them dropping out, so they can get back on-message, and the choice becomes Republicans vs. Democrats, instead of Republicans vs. Republicans and Republicans vs. The Poor, and Republicans vs. Women, and…

I still believe Romney is going to be nominated, because he has too much money to spend on negative ad campaigns, compared to Santorum and Gingrich, who are both still in the race only because they each have billionaire “sugar daddies” throwing money at them:

1. christianpost.com/news/gingrichs-casino-sugar-daddy-and-his-influence-on-the-gop-primary-68555/

2. dailykos.com/story/2012/02/16/1065501/-Rick-Santorum-s-sugar-daddy-In-my-day-girls-put-aspirin-between-their-knees-for-contraception

If he takes too long to get them to quit, though, his reputation as someone with passionate convictions about anything at all will be zero, nada, zilch.

If Santorum gets the nomination because Gingrich drops out, Paul pulls a consistent 20% of the vote, and Romney pulls a consistent 35% of the vote, leaving 45% winner-take-all victories for Santorum, he will have successfully painted himself into the corner of being the wacko “He-Man Woman Haters Club” founder and president, energizing American women from coast to coast to vote not necessarily FOR Obama, but definitely AGAINST Santorum.

If Gingrich gets the nomination, he’s going to go BUCK WILD in debates against Obama and make Republicans seem like creeps, most likely leading to several seat losses to Democrats in the next set of elections. Congress’ approval rating is already down around 9% (meaning that 9 out of 100 people actually like how they’re carrying themselves in Washington), so Gingrich running around illin’ will most likely be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

If Paul gets the nomination, that would probably indicate that Republicans in Congress have irretrievably destroyed their brand, and need to rebuild their party from the ground up for the 2016 campaign.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 02]
• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 01]
• Brokered Conventions
• Done With Politics
• President Obama Reelection Roadmap

ok.. I’ve seen enough Republican tomfoolery to drop my overall prediction for how the 2012 Presidential election is going to go. >:D

As far as my predictions for New Hampshire, I was right that Romney was going to win (everybody knew that). I had hoped that Huntsman would edge out Paul, but he didn’t. I had thought that Santorum would be ahead of Gingrich, but he wasn’t. Perry was at the bottom, where he should have been, since he didn’t even campaign in New Hampshire, and Bachmann got 343 votes, even though she already dropped out of the race.

Here’s what I think is going to happen, going forward, which should result in the reelection of President Obama:

Gingrich

Gingrich is upset because he thought he was going to get over with “Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican”, and Romney was like “**** That! >:D”

According to the pundits, Iowa television was inundated with negative ads about Gingrich, which I’ve spoken about, previously.

If this had been 1975, their money would have been spent. Since it isn’t, those videos will live on on YouTube ad infinitum. They were used in New Hampshire. They will be used in South Carolina. They will be used by Democrats. They will be used with Green Eggs And Ham… Forever.

Gingrich couldn’t do anything about this because he didn’t have any money in his campaign to match the Super PAC that’s backing Romney’s play… However… *NOW*, some dude gave Gingrich 5 million dollars to go berserk with ads in South Carolina. >:D

This money will be spent trashing Romney’s name and achievements by calling him a “Vulture Capitalist” (instead of Venture Capitalist, haha so funny! :D) because of how he’s made his money by taking over companies and making decisions for them that have resulted in LOTS of job losses, while also creating jobs.

This campaign will be extremely effective to make Romney look bad, because Romney won’t show people the documents that compare the number of people who LOST JOBS to the number of people who gained them because of his company.

Similarly, Romney doesn’t want to reveal his tax data, which, of course, would indicate whether or not he’s still profiting from people losing their jobs.

So, Gingrich, himself, is finished. Kaput. Any time he makes a move, people are going to break out the YouTube videos that Romney’s Super PAC and Ron Paul’s team made about him, and then he’s going to stay with a very low percentage of votes in every single primary and caucus.

He already knows this, so he’s on a kamikaze mission to take Romney down with him, which will result in even MORE useful material for the Democrats to use in the general election, since, like I said from the giddyap, Romney was the only actual candidate that the Republicans fielded this cycle, and was always going to be their nominee.

Paul

I have to give the Ron Paul supporters their props, because they’ve really sustained their candidate and kept him in good position, even though neither Democratic nor Republican pundits wanted to talk about him this entire time. They have to talk about Paul *NOW*, or else they’ll look like they don’t know what the **** they’re doing.

Last I checked, Paul didn’t have enough money for television ads in Florida, so he was skipping campaigning there, and going straight to the next state in the order. That might have changed after his strong 2nd place showing in New Hampshire, if he received an infusion of cash.

Either way, he’s running a week-to-week operation, and he really shouldn’t be able to keep up with the war machine that Romney already has available, fully-oiled and properly running, so I can’t imagine Paul receiving the Republican nomination.

Paul’s role, going forward, will be a factual dismantling of Romney’s position, which, again, will add to the ammunition that the Democrats have for the general election.

Santorum

I kept telling you people that there WAS. NO. SANTORUM. SURGE! >:D

Santorum received a religious endorsement in Iowa from a group that doesn’t have any props in New Hampshire. Case Closed.

He was polling at 10% before he got that endorsement. He “surged” because 57% of the people that voted in the Iowa caucus identified themselves as Evangelical Christians. He went to New Hampshire and received his requisite 10% of the vote, just like I said.

The pundits don’t want to talk about this, because then they’d have to talk about the issue of Romney and Huntsman being Mormons, which obviously wasn’t a problem in New Hampshire, as they ranked #1 and #3 out of the six remaining candidates, with Santorum ranking #5, because Perry didn’t even campaign in NH and ended up #6.

Santorum’s role going forward is going to be to split the religious vote with Perry, nullifying both of their opportunities to make any real waves.

His other role is going to be to keep spewing wrong-side-of-history statements that are going to make Republicans in general look bad to independents.

Other than that, he shouldn’t have much effect on the inevitable nominee, Romney, because he’s not spending money on negative television/YouTube advertisements about him.

Santorum has no money and no boots-on-the-ground infrastucture, so he shouldn’t be going very far past South Carolina.

Perry

Perry should have quit when he had the chance, after Iowa! :D haha

The *ONLY* reason Perry should stick around is that he has religious backing from the Bible Belt. If that doesn’t create a situation-based “surge” like Santorum received, he needs to pack it up for real and go back to Texas and stay there.

If he doesn’t do well in South Carolina, Perry needs to just quit, because all he’s doing is splitting the religious vote with Santorum. Nobody, Nobody, Nobody, Nobody, NOBODY wants to see him try to debate Barack Obama! :D HAHAHA

Perry got basically no votes in Iowa, he got almost absolutely no votes in New Hampshire.. If he doesn’t receive a massive turnout in South Carolina, it’s going to be way too late to BEGIN getting votes / securing delagates at the FOURTH contest in the series.

Huntsman

Even though I’ve known this whole time that they were going to send Romney to the big dance, I had been hoping against hope that Huntsman would be able to sway enough voters to be competitive for the nomination.

I’m not sure that pulling 40,000 votes to Mitt Romney’s 95,000 votes makes the case.

Either way, Huntsman’s heading to South Carolina to try it again. He may as well. He has infinite cash. His pops is like the original baller, shot caller! :D haha en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Huntsman,_Sr. .. Dude *INVENTED* the “clamshell” container for McDonald’s Big Mac that we still use to this very day, so Huntsman may as well spend a bunch more money campaigning in SC, since it’s a drop in the bucket.

I’m also not sure that pulling fewer votes than Ron Paul makes the case, either.

New Hampshire was Jon Huntsman’s high water mark. He skipped Iowa entirely to campaign there this entire time, and he came away with 17% of the votes, compared to Romney’s 40%.

The Utah Primary doesn’t even happen until June www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-republican-primary-schedule/, and Huntsman should be out of the race WAAAAAAAY before June! :D

The way I see it, if he doesn’t do extremely well in South Carolina, he needs to hang it up with Perry.

I’m a fan of what Huntsman is saying and the way he carries himself and that he took Utah to #1 in job creation during his terms as Governor, but business is business. >:D

Romney

According to me, this sends Romney to the general election to attempt to defeat President Barack Obama.

At first, I saw this as slightly possible. Now, I don’t.

Through the first series of debates, the candidates didn’t want to say anything to or about Romney. This is because he was never the frontrunner. All these non-candidates were having surges which lasted as long as it took for the press to find out the very slightest things about them, and then the public was like “Nahhhhh! :/”.

So Romney got to stand there looking Presidential, without actually saying anything.

Now that people have realized that he’s the only candidate that was ever fielded by the Republicans this cycle, they’ve been going at him in real-time, and he’s been folding.

He offered a $10,000 bet to Rick Perry, knowing that he (Romney) is worth approximately 250 million dollars… Are you ******* KIDDING??? >:D

Romney worth up to $264 million; earned up to $68,000 per speech before campaign

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, who made part of his fortune as co-founder of a private equity firm, and his wife have personal financial assets worth as much as $264 million, according to disclosure documents filed Friday.

The records suggest that Romney may have seen a small, but limited, drop in wealth during one of the nation’s worst economic downturns, with a maximum asset value about 8 percent lower than what he reported during his first White House bid in 2007.

The numbers underscore an issue that poses both a benefit and a challenge for the former Massachusetts governor, who points to his business experience as evidence of his ability to lead the country.

But Romney, who grew up in a wealthy family before expanding his fortunes at the Bain Capital equity firm, also has struggled to portray himself as a candidate in touch with the lives of regular voters.

Since then, he’s said and done a bunch of other stuff that give away that fact that (rightfully so, because he’s always been rich) he’s not in touch with American workers AT. ALL.

Most importantly, he’s committed unforced errors as well as having been baited into errors by the likes of such debate geniuses as Rick Perry.

It’s become apparent that as long as Romney has memorized his flash cards, he can seem like he’s giving a spontaneous, intelligent presentation, but as soon as he tries to ad-lib, he ends up staying stupid-but-authentic things like “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me”:

YouTube Link => youtu.be/nBfWB64iHAs

The link I posted has the entire context of what he was talking about, which was insurance providers, but the important part is that you can see and hear the change in his demeanor. :) He was running his mouth and as soon as he said that, people in the crowd started chuckling, and you see Romney go “OH ****! :O” and every word he says after that is like BUH-B, BUH-B, stumbling and bumbling all over the place, because he got nervous, realizing that he had tipped his hand.

The short version of that video that only has him saying “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me” will be played over and over, whenever he attempts to run for *ANY* public office for the rest of his life.

This indicates to me that Romney will continue to commit these gaffes, to the ultimate delight of the people in charge of Obama’s reelection campaign, and also that when he finally has to debate Barack Obama, he’s going to get sorely embarrassed every time he’s forced outside of his cue-card comfort zone.

Hail To The Chief

So, No.. I’m not seeing it anymore. I feel like the 2012 Republican nomination process has provided the blueprint / roadmap for the reelection of our current President, Barack Obama.

The extraneous, unelectable “candidates” will continue to buzz around and create more anti-Romney media for the Democrats to use in the general election.

If they were smart / unselfish, they would decide on one of them to be nominated and all the rest of them would drop out.

In a two-person contest, you can’t win with 39.4% of the vote. :D

In a three-person contest, you have very good odds of winning with those many votes. There are currently six people involved, and there shouldn’t be.

Perry should drop out because it’s clear that people don’t see him as smart enough to be able to defeat President Obama in the general election.

Santorum should drop out unless he has a string of religious endorsements coming up very soon.

Huntsman should drop out if his message doesn’t resonate in South Carolina, because that means his gambit didn’t work and probably won’t work during the rest of the nomination process.

Gingrich should drop out because he’s been statistically eliminated by Romney’s Super PAC’s onslaught of negative ads about him, and he’ll never recover from that.

Ron Paul *SHOULDN’T* drop out, because he’s having the time of his life! :D

YouTube Link => youtu.be/Da6irSCvnZY

Play On, Playah!!! >:D hahaha Get Yo’ *CELEBRATE* On! :D hahaha

But, Yeah.. When the dust settles, Romney is going to be the nominee, but his fellow Republicans will have researched and revealed so many flaws in his background, ideas, style and personality that it’ll be a cakewalk for the Obama team to trounce him in the general election.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• Brokered Conventions
• Done With Politics
• Republican GOP Presidential Candidate Debate 2011 [Part 02]
• The Current Republican Problem
• Republican Race To The Bottom

Send In The Clowns

I told you from the beginning that this cycle’s selection of Republican candidates is an absolute clown show, to put it kindly.

I also asked two main questions. The first one was “Where are the broke (poor) Republicans?”. The second was “How come none of the better Republicans (Chris Christie, Paul Ryan, etc) want to run, if they think it’s going to be so easy to defeat President Obama in 2012?”.

I was previously done talking about this tomfoolery, but the last few days, the pundits have been talking about something they hadn’t mentioned this entire time…

Beat The Clock

When the Republicans were crying for Chris Christie to run, ALLLLL the pundits were saying that he only had until X date, because after that, he couldn’t register for the first primary, etc.

When that date passed, the pundits INSISTED that this keystone-cops’esque group of candidates were the only ones that could POSSIBLY be nominated.

This remained in effect for a couple of months, I suppose. Meanwhile, it had become clear to me that the only Republican candidate that stood a chance of defeating Obama in 2012 was Romney. This was because Huntsman, who I think is a way better candidate, has been polling at less than 5% this entire time (being generous.. I’m actually not sure he was ever above 3%), and other than him, all the other candidates have offended just about everyone in the country, pandering to “The Right”, and they wouldn’t possibly get any votes from independents that would put them anywhere near to a victory in the general election.

For instance.. Michele Bachmann has been running around saying she wants to deport 12 million illegal aliens. This is because nobody had asked her what Bill O’Reilly finally asked her to her face, which was “How do you plan to do that? o_O”. Her answer was “Enforce the laws that aren’t currently being enforced”.

Obviously, that doesn’t make ANY SENSE, because you can only enforce laws against people who BREAK. THE. LAW., so O’Reilly asked her if she understood how costly it was going to be to go door-to-door, finding the 12 million aliens, arresting them, processing them, and flying them out of the country. Of course, she had no reply for that, because her plan was stupid to begin with. It’s just NONSENSE she was talking in order to try to be nominated, just like waving a magic wand and creating $2 gasoline in a free market economy (about which she has ALSO not offered a viable plan).

Then, you have Santorum saying something ridiculous every week. He’ll be off the stage soon. I predict he’ll have enough after the first round of voting, which is coming up in 3-4 weeks. SEEYA! >:D

Then, there was Cain, talking about electrified fences and drones to keep Mexicans in Mexico. Haven’t heard jack-**** from him in a full week, ever since he “suspended” his campaign. SEEYA! >:D

Then, you have Ron Paul, who has really, really good ideas, assuming you live in the gold-rush era of the United States Wild West. :) Basically, his idea for life is “Every man for himself”. Get rid of federal this and that, and if your house floats down the river, it sucks to be you. He won’t be nominated, and he MOST CERTAINLY will never be elected President.

Then, you have Perry, who was at the top of the statistics until the first time he opened his mouth… From then on, it’s been one glaring embarrassment after another, and even before all of his gaffes, President Obama was being kind to him… I should say, before AMERICA heard all of Perry’s blunders. I’m sure there’s an entire file full of them that Obama was already aware of by the time he made this statement:

YouTube Link => youtu.be/PYzmzzA9dTY

President Obama: “You know.. Mr. Perry just got in the Presidental race, and I think that everybody who runs for President, it probably takes them a little bit of time before they start realizing that this isn’t like running for Governor or running for Senator or running for Congress, and you’ve gotta be a little more careful about what you say.. But I’ll cut him some slack, he’s only been at it for a few days now”

And then it was just downhill, downhill, downhill, downhill…

So the only person left that hasn’t completely, utterly, absolutely disqualified himself from the race is Gingrich. He’s currently receiving all the Not-Romney or Anti-Romney or Anybody-But-Romney poll votes.

So, it would seem that since Romney can’t get past 25% EVAR in the polls, that now that Gingrich is pulling higher numbers, Republicans would be talking Gingrich, Gingrich, Gingrich now, right?…

WRONG! :D

What?… Who?

The last few days, I’ve been hearing about JEB BUSH, who was never a part of this process AT ALL, from the giddyap!

Of course, I wondered if maybe someone made a mistake, but a different pundit mentioned his name, and a different pundit on a different station, and I was like WTF is going on here? o_O

ALL OF A SUDDEN, what they’re talking about is a “Brokered Convention”

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brokered_convention

A brokered convention is a situation in United States politics in which there are not enough delegates ‘won’ during the presidential primary and caucus elections for a single candidate to have a pre-existing majority, during the first official vote for a political party’s presidential-candidate at its nominating convention.

Once the first ballot, or vote, has occurred, and no candidate has a majority of the delegates’ votes, the convention is then considered brokered; thereafter, the nomination is decided through a process of alternating political horse-trading, and additional re-votes.[1][2][3][4] In this circumstance, all regular delegates (who, previously, were pledged to the candidate who had won their respective state’s primary or caucus election) are “released,” and are able to switch their allegiance to a different candidate before the next round of balloting. It is hoped that this ‘freedom’ will result in a re-vote resulting in a clear majority of delegates for one candidate.

Do you think the pundits might have mentioned this MONTHS AGO? :D ******* IDIOTS! :D

Start From Scratch

If this circus act becomes a Brokered Convention, the Republicans can turn around and nominate anybody they want, so they can easily replace one of these clowns with a viable Republican candidate.

How might this happen?

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/the_gop_needs_a_brokered_convention/singleton/” rel=”nofollow”>www.salon.com/2011/11/23/the_gop_needs_a_brokered_convention/singleton/

Less noticed, but no less important, is the new GOP voting system, which is set up for early primary and caucus states to vote first, followed by all other proportionally allocated delegate states next. From April 1 on, the winner-take-all primary and caucus states will vote. That means a weak front-runner can earn victories in early states without taking a commanding share of that state’s delegates, while several challengers can lose, but still rack up a decent delegate total.

Ron Paul, for instance, is often overlooked by the media as a factor because his ceiling of support in the polls appears to be between 10 and 15 percent. But since his floor of support isn’t far below that, he will be able to pick up a chunk of delegates who won’t be available to Romney. The same will be true for Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry if they stay in the race — and the latter has plenty of cash still on hand.

But Not Mitt Romney won’t be on the ballot, right? Well, yes and no. Several candidates who aren’t Mitt Romney are likely to be on the ballot in all 50 states. If a majority of the party agrees on nothing more than Not Mitt Romney, the real Mitt Romey cannot enter April with a majority of delegates. If Romney is able to climb to even 30 percent nationally in the pre-April states — something he hasn’t done in a single national poll — and wins a corresponding percentage of the vote, he would still have only 349 delegates. That means he would need to capture 868 of the 1,217 winner-take-all delegates to capture the nomination through the primary process. His only hope is that the other candidates have dropped out.

And, if they do, why exactly would the party leaders step in to save Romney’s nomination? Rather than settle for a nominee incapable of generating enthusiasm, they could use the convention to find a candidate more in tune with the Republican voters.

BOOYAH!!! :D HAHAHA Enter Jeb Bush!!! >:D

So the final joke might be on everybody watching these shenanigans.

If Romney splits all the delegates before April with Gingrich, Paul & Perry (Bachmann & Santorum will be out of the race looooong before then) and then loses pathetically in the South, because they don’t feel like voting for a Mormon, all this may have been for nothing, as the Republicans nominate whomever they like for the general election, including Chris Christie, Paul Ryan or anybody else that formerly claimed they weren’t going to run.

Thinkin’ Of A Master Plan

Unfortunately for the Republicans, by the time that happens, their obstructionist tactics and blatant disregard for the poor will have fully backfired on them and it won’t matter who they send to lose to Obama.

If this workers’ tax cut and extended unemployment benefits plan isn’t passed, the blame will be placed on Republicans, every single day, from now until election day.

If nobody gets a job, it will be blamed on the Republicans, every day.

If the troops that just returned home can’t find work, it will be blamed on the Republicans, every day.

Oh.. I forgot Gingrich.. I fully expect him to self-destruct before he gains enough delegates to be nominated. He SHOULD, however, be able to block Romney enough to catalyze the Brokered Convention.

I’d like to believe that this is the actual Republican master plan.. That they have some super-nominee waiting in the wings, practicing INTELLIGENT answers about foreign policy, prepping debate skills, and practicing speeches.

Having seen them send Palin last cycle, I think that concept is highly unlikely, and I continue to be amazed and amused that the Republicans REFUSE to send their best & brightest to challenge Barack Obama for the Presidency of the United States of America.
–
Follow Bill via Google+ | Facebook | Twitter | Email Subscription | RSS Feed

Related Posts

• Republican Race To The Bottom
• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 02]
• What Is Your Jobs Plan? [Part 01]
• Done With Politics
• Obama vs. Romney 2012